A CUSUM Scheme for Autocorrelated Observations

References

• Adams, B. M.; Lowry, C.; and Woodall, W. H. (1992). “The Use (and Misuse) of False Alarm Probabilities in Control Chart Design” in Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 4, edited by H.J. Lenz, G.B. Wetherill, P.Th. Wilrich. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, B. M. and Tseng, I. T. (1998). “Robustness of Forecast-Based Monitoring Schemes”. Journal of Quality Technology 30, pp. 328–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwan, L. C. (1992). “Effects of Autocorrelation on Control Chart Performance”. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 21, pp. 1025–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atienza, O. O.; Tang, L. C.; and Ang, B. W. (1999). “Fast Initial Response in a CUSUM Mask Scheme”. Quality Engineering 11, pp. 541–546.
   Google Scholar
• Atienza, O. O.; Tang, L. C.; and Ang, B. W. (2000). “A Uniformly Most Powerful Cumulative Sum Scheme Based on Symmetry”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, D 49, pp. 209–217.
   Google Scholar
• Bagshaw, M. and Johnson, R. A. (1975). “The Effect of Serial Correlation on the Performance of CUSUM Tests II”. Technometrics 17, pp. 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, G. A. (1959). “Control Charts and Stochastic Processes”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 21, pp. 239–257.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P.; Jenkins, G. M.; and Reinsel, G. C. (1994). Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Brockwell, P. J. and Davis, R. A. (1987). Time Series Analysis: Theory and Methods. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, T. J. and Ross, W. H. (1991). “Statistical Process Control Procedures for Correlated Observations”. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 69, pp. 48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S. J. and Roan, C. (1996). “Change Patterns of Time Series-Based Control Charts”. Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 302–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. A. and Bagshaw, M. (1974). “The Effect of Serial Correlation on the Performance of CUSUM Tests”. Technometrics 16, pp. 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMSL. (1991). User's Manual Statistical Library, Version 2, IMSL Inc., Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, W. S. W. and Adams, B. M. (1996). “Combined Control Charts for Forecast-Based Monitoring Schemes”. Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 289–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, C. W. and Reynolds, M. R., Jr. (1999a). “EWMA Control Charts for Monitoring the Mean of Autocorrelated Processes”. Journal of Quality Technology 31, pp. 166–188.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, C. W. and Reynolds, M. R., Jr. (1999b). “Control Charts for Monitoring the Mean and Variance of Autocorrelated Processes”. Journal of Quality Technology 31, pp. 259–274.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, C. W. and Reynolds, M. R., Jr. (2001). “CUSUM Charts for Monitoring an Autocorrelated Process”. Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 316–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, J. M. and Sacucci, M. S. (1992). “Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Control Schemes: Properties and Enhancements”. Technometrics 32, pp. 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 4th. ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Page, E. S. (1953). “Continuous Inspection Schemes”. Biometrika 41, pp. 100–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. W. (1959). “Control Charts Based on Geometric Moving Averages”. Technometrics 1, pp. 239–250.
   Google Scholar
• Runger, G. C. (2002). “Assignable Causes and Autocorrelation: Control Charts for Observations or Residuals?”. Journal of Quality Technology 34, pp. 165–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runger, G. C. and Willemain, T. R. (1995). “Model-Based or Model-Free Control for Autocorrelated Processes”. Journal of Quality Technology 27, pp. 283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runger, G. C.; Willemain, T. R.; and Prabhu, S. (1995). “Average Run Lengths for CUSUM Control Charts Applied to Residuals”. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 24, pp. 273–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shewhart, W. A. (1932). Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. Van-Nostrand Reinhold, Princeton, N.J.
   Google Scholar
• Wardell, D. G.; Moskowitz, H.; and Plante, R. D. (1994). “Run-Length Distributions of Special-Cause Control Charts for Correlated Processes” (with discussion). Technometrics 36, pp. 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardell, D. G.; Moskowitz, H.; and Plante, R. D. (1995). “Letter to the Editor”. Technometrics 37, pp. 243–245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H. (2000). “Controversies and Contradictions in Statistical Process Control” (with discussion). Journal of Quality Technology 32, pp. 341–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H. and Adams, B. M. (1993). “The Statistical Design of CUSUM Charts”. Quality Engineering 5, pp. 559–570.
   Google Scholar
• Yashchin, E. (1993). “Performance of CUSUM Control Schemes for Serially Correlated Observations”. Technometrics 35, pp. 37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar