A Review of Methods for Measurement Systems Capability Analysis

References

• Adamec, E. and Burdick, R. K. (2003). “Confidence Intervals for a Discrimination Ratio in a Gauge R&R Study with Three Random Factors”. Quality Engineering 15, pp. 383–389.
   Google Scholar
• Automotive Industry Action Group (1995). Measurement Systems Analysis, 2nd ed. Detroit, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Automotive Industry Action Group (2002). Measurement Systems Analysis, 3rd ed. Detroit, Ml.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. H.; McCormack, Jr., D. W.; Moore, T. L.; Prins, J.; Tobias, P. A.; and Pore, M. (1997). “A Comparison of Gauge Study Practices”. ASA Proceedings of the Section on Quality and Productivity, pp. 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Barrentine, L. B. (1991). Concepts for R&R Studies. ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeret, F.; Maubert, S.; Sourd, P.; and Puel, F. (2001). “Improving and Applying Destructive Gauge Capability”. Quality Engineering 14, pp. 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Borror, C. M.; Montgomery, D. C.; and Runger, G. C. (1997). “Confidence Intervals for Variance Components from Gauge Capability Studies”. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 13, pp. 361–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyles, R. A. (2001). “Gauge Capability for Pass-Fail Inspection”. Technometrics 43, pp. 223–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdick, R. K.; Allen, A. E.; and Larsen, G. A. (2002). “Comparing Variability of Two Measurement Processes Using R&R Studies”. Journal of Quality Technology 34, pp. 97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdick, R. K. and Graybill, F. A. (1992). Confidence Intervals on Variance Components. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Burdick, R. K. and Larsen, G. A. (1997). “Confidence Intervals on Measures of Variability in R&R Studies”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 261–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, A. K. L. (2001). “A Simple General Method for Constructing Confidence Intervals for Functions of Variance Components”. Technometrics 43, pp. 356–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, A. K. L. (2002). “Improved Confidence Intervals for a Ratio in an R&R Study”. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 31, pp. 329–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conors, M.; Merrill, K.; and O'Donnell, B. (1995). “A Comprehensive Approach to Measurement System Evaluation”. ASA Proceedings of the Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences, pp. 136–138.
   Google Scholar
• Croarkin, C., Editor (2002). “Gauge R&R Studies”. Section 2.4 of the Beta Version of the NIST/SEMATECH Engineering Statistics Internet Handbook. Located at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/.
   Google Scholar
• Deutler, T. (1991). “Grubbs-Type Estimators for Reproducibility Variances in an Interlaboratory Test Study”. Journal of Quality Technology 23, pp. 324–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doganaksoy, N. (2000). “Assessment of Impact of Measurement Variability in the Presence of Multiple Sources of Product Variability”. Quality Engineering 13, pp. 83–89.
   Google Scholar
• Dolezal, K. K.; Burdick, R. K.; and Birch, N. J. (1998). “Analysis of a Two-Factor R&R Study With Fixed Operators”. Journal of Quality Technology 30, pp. 163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, J. and De Vries, B. (1997). “Evaluating a Well-Known Criterion for Measurement Precision”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 469–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graybill, F. A. and Wang, C. M. (1980). “Confidence Intervals on Nonnegative Linear Combinations of Variances”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75, pp. 869–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada, M. and Weerahandi, S. (2000). “Measurement System Assessment Via Generalized Inference”. Journal of Quality Technology 32, pp. 241–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horrell, K. (1991). Introduction to Measurement Capability Analysis. SEMATECH report 91090709A-ENG.
   Google Scholar
• Houf, R. E. and Berman, D. B. (1988). “Statistical Analysis of Power Module Thermal Test Equipment Performance”. IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology 11, pp. 516–520.
   Google Scholar
• JMP 4.0.4 (2001). SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. (1994). Alternative Models for Gauge Studies. SEMATECH report 93081755A-TR.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Y. W. and Chew, E. P. (2000). “Gauge Capability Assessment for High-Yield Manufacturing Processes with Truncated Distribution”. Quality Engineering 13, pp. 203–210.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, G. (2002). “Measurement System Analysis: The Usual Metrics Can Be Noninformative”. Quality Engineering 15, pp. 293–298.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, G. (2003). “Measurement System Analysis in a Production Test Environment with Multiple Test Parameters”. Quality Engineering, to appear.
   Google Scholar
• Leiva, R. A. and Graybill, F. A. (1986). “Confidence Intervals for Variance Components in the Balanced Two-Way Model With Interaction”. Communications in Statistics— Simulation and Computation 15, pp. 301–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majeske, K. D. and Andrews, R. W. (2002). “Evaluating Measurement Systems and Manufacturing Processes Using Three Quality Measures”. Quality Engineering 15, pp. 243–251.
   Google Scholar
• Mader, D. P.; Prins, J.; and Lampe, R. E. (1999). “The Economic Impact of Measurement Error”. Quality Engineering 11, pp. 563–5074.
   Google Scholar
• MINITAB 13 (2001). Minitab Inc., State College, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T.; Hegemann, V.; and Liu, K. C. (1997). “GRR Methodology for Destructive Testing and Quantitative Assessment of Gauge Capability for One-Side Specifications” in Statistical Case Studies for Industrial Process Improvement edited by V. Czitrom and P. D. Spagon, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C. (1993a). “Gauge Capability and Designed Experiments. Part I: Basic Methods”. Quality Engineering 6, pp. 115–135.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C. (1993b). “Gauge Capability Analysis and Designed Experiments. Part II: Experimental Design Models and Variance Component Estimation”. Quality Engineering 6, pp. 289–305.
   Google Scholar
• Morchower, N. D. (1999). “Two-Location Gauge Evaluation”. Quality Progress 32/4, pp. 79–86.
   Google Scholar
• NCSS (2001). NCSS Statistical Software, Kaysville, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. R.; Jeffries, R.; Schneider, J.; and Frankoski, S. P. (1997). “Using Repeatability and Reproducibility Studies to Evaluate a Destructive Test Method”. Quality Engineering 10, pp. 283–290.
   Google Scholar
• SAS 8.2 (2001). SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
   Google Scholar
• STATGRAPHICS PLUS 5.0 (2000). Manugistics, Inc. Rockville, MD.
   Google Scholar
• STATISTICA 6.0 (2001). Statsoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, K. and Weerahandi, S. (1989). “Generalized p-values in Significance Testing of Hypotheses in the Presence of Nuisance Parameters”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84, pp. 602–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Heuvel, E. R. and Trip, A. (2002). “Evaluation of Measurement Systems with a Small Number of Observers”. Quality Engineering 15, pp. 323–331.
   Google Scholar
• Vardeman, S. B. and Van Valkenburg, E. S. (1999). “Two-Way Random-Effects Analyses and Gauge R&R Studies”. Technometrics 41, pp. 202–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkel, J. G. (2003). “Gauge R&R Analysis for Two-Dimensional Data with Circular Tolerances”. Journal of Quality Technology 35, pp. 153–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerahandi, S. (1993). “Generalized Confidence Intervals”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, pp. 899–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D. J. (1992). “Problems With Gauge R&R Studies”. ASQC Quality Congress Transactions, pp. 179–185.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D. J. and Lyday, R. W. (1989). Evaluating the Measurement Process. SPC Press, Knoxville, TN.
   Google Scholar