Fraction of Design Space Plots for Assessing Mixture and Mixture-Process Designs

References

• Borkowski, J. J. (1995). “Spherical Prediction Variance Properties of Central Composite and Box-Behnken Designs”. Technometrics 37, pp. 399–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borror, C. M.; Montgomery, D. C.; and Myers R. H. (2002) “Evaluation of Statistical Designs for Experiments Involving Noise Variables”. Journal of Quality Technology 34, pp. 54–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P. and Hunter, J. S. (1957). “Multifactor Experimental Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces”. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 28, pp. 195–241.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, J. A. (1990). Experiments with Mixtures: Designs, Models, and the Analysis of Mixture Data, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, J. A. (2002). Experiments with Mixtures: Designs, Models, and the Analysis of Mixture Data, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, J. A. and Gorman, J. W. (1984). “Fractional Design Plans for Process Variables in Mixture Experiments”. Journal of Quality Technology 16, pp. 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czitrom, V. (1988). “Mixture Experiments with Process Variables: D-Optimal Orthogonal Experimental Designs”. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 17, pp. 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czitrom, V. (1990). “Experimental Designs for Four Mixture Components with Process Variables”. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 18, pp. 4561–4581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovannitti-Jensen, A. and Myers, R. H. (1989). “Graphical Assessment of the Prediction Capability of Response Surface Designs”. Technometrics 31, pp. 159–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfarb, H. B.; Borror, C. M.; Montgomery, D. C.; and Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2004). “Three-Dimensional Variance Dispersion Graphs for Mixture-Process Experiments”. Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuri, A. I.; Harrison, J. M.; and Cornell, J. A. (1999). “Using Quantile Plots of the Prediction Variance for Comparing Designs for a Constrained Mixture Region: An Application Involving a Fertilizer Experiment”. Applied Statistics 48, pp. 521–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, S. M.; Cornell, J. A.; and Vining, G. G. (2000). “A New Model and Class of Designs for Mixture Experiments with Process Variables”. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 29, pp. 2255–2280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, S. M.; Cornell, J. A.; and Vining, G. G. (2002). “Split Plot Designs and Estimation Methods”. Technometrics 44, pp. 72–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, R. A. and Anderson, V. L. (1966). “Extreme Vertices Design of Mixture Experiments”. Technometrics 24, pp. 447–456.
   Google Scholar
• Myers R. H. and Montgomery, D. C. (2002). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H.; Vining, G. G.; Giovannitti-Jensen, A. and Myers, S. L. (1992). “Variance Dispersion Properties of Second-Order Response Surface Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 24, pp. 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piepel, G. and Anderson, C. M. (1992). “Variance Dispersion Graphs for Designs on Polyhedral Regions”. Proceedings of the Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences, American Statistical Association, pp. 111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Piepel, G.; Anderson, C. M.; and Redgate, P. E. (1993a). “Variance Dispersion Graphs for Designs on Polyhedral Regions—Revisited”. Proceedings of the Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences, American Statistical Association, Alexandria, Virginia, pp. 102–107.
   Google Scholar
• Piepel, G.; Anderson, C. M.; and Redgate, P. E. (1993b). “Response Surface Designs for Irregularly-Shaped Regions” (Parts 1, 2, and 3). Proceedings of the Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences, American Statistical Association, Alexandria, Virginia, pp. 205–227.
   Google Scholar
• Piepel, G.; Anderson, C. M.; and Redgate, P. E. (1995). “Variance Dispersion Graphs for Evaluating and Comparing Experimental Designs on Polyhedral Regions”. Technical Report PNWD-SA-4218, Batelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Rozum, M. A. and Myers, R. H. (1991). “Variance Dispersion Graphs for Cuboidal Regions”. Paper Presented at Joint Statistical Meetings, American Statistical Association, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Snee, R. D. and Raynor, A. A. (1982). “Assessing the Accuracy of Mixture Model Regression Calculations”. Journal of Quality Technology 14, pp. 67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stat-Ease, Inc. (2002). Design-Expert Version 6.06. Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Trinca, L. A. and Gilmour, S. G. (1998). “Variance Dispersion Graphs for Comparing Blocked Response Surface Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 30, pp. 314–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, G. (1993). “A Computer Program for Generating Variance Dispersion Graphs”. Journal of Quality Technology 25, pp. 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, G. G.; Cornell, J. A.; and Myers, R. H. (1993). “A Graphical Approach for Evaluating Mixture Designs”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C 42, pp.127–138.
   Google Scholar
• Zahran, A. R.; Anderson-Cook, C. M.; and Myers, R. H. (2003). “Fraction of Design Space to Assess Prediction Capability of Response Surface Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 35, pp. 377–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar