References
- Bingham, D. and Sitter, R. S. (1999a). “Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs”. Technometrics 41, pp. 62–70.
- Bingham, D. and Sitter, R. S. (1999b). “Some Theoretical Results for Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs”. The Annals of Statistics 27, pp. 1240–1255.
- Bingham, D. and Sitter, R. S. (2001). “Design Issues in Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments”. Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp.1–15.
- Bisgaard, S. (2000). “The Design and Analysis of Split Plot Experiments”. Journal of Quality Technology 32, pp. 39–56.
- Bisgaard, S. and Steinberg, D. M. (1997). “The Design and Analysis of Prototype Experiments”. Technometrics 39, pp. 52–62.
- Box, G. E. P. (1996). “Split-Plot Experiments”. Quality Engineering 8, pp. 515–520.
- Box, G. E. P. and Jones, S. (1992). “Split-Plot Designs for Robust Product Experimentation”. Journal of Applied Statistics 19, pp. 3–26.
- Box, G. E. P. and Wilson, K. B. (1951). “On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13, pp. 1–45.
- Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2001). “Optimal Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 436–450.
- Huang, P.; Chen, D.; and Voelkel, J. O. (1998). “Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Split-Plot Designs”. Technometrics 40, pp. 314–326.
- Khuri, A. I. and Cornell, J. A. (1996). Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses, 2nd ed. Dekker, New York, NY.
- Kowalski, S. M. (2002). “24-Run Split-Plot Experiments for Robust Parameter Design”. Journal of Quality Technology 34, pp. 399–410.
- Kowalski, S. M.; Vining, G. G.; Montgomery, D. C.; and Borror, C. M. (2004). “Modifying a Central Composite Design to Model the Process Mean and Variance When There Are Hard-to-Change Factors”. Submitted to Technometrics.
- Letsinger, J. D.; Myers, R. H.; and Lentner, M. (1996). “Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures”. Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 381–397.
- Lucas, J. M. and Hazel, M. C. (1997). “Running Experiments With Multiple Error Terms: How an Experiment Is Run Is Important”. ASQC Technical Conference Transactions. American Society for Quality Control, Milwaukee, WI. pp. 283–296.
- Lucas, J. M. and Ju, H. L. (1992). “Split Plotting and Randomization in Industrial Experiments”. ASQC Quality Congress Transactions. American Society for Quality Control, Nashville, TN. pp. 374–382.
- Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C. (1995). Response Surface Methodology, Process and Product Optimization Using Design Experiments. Wiley, New York, NY.
- Myers, R. H.; Montgomery, D. C.; Vining, G. G.; Borror, C. M.; and Kowalski, S. M. (2004). “Response Surface Methodology: A Retrospective and Literature Survey”. Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 53–77.
- Schoen, E. D. (1999). “Designing Fractional Two-Level Experiments With Nested Error Structures”. Journal of Applied Statistics 26, pp. 495–508.
- Sztendur, E. M. and Diamond, N. T. (2002). “Extensions to Confidence Region Calculations for the Path of Steepest Ascent”. Journal of Quality Technology 34, pp. 289–296.
- Vining, G. G.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2004). “Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure”. Journal of Quality Technology (to appear).