Comparing Computer Experiments for Fitting High-Order Polynomial Metamodels

References

• Allen, T. T.; Bernshteyn, M. A.; and Kabiri-Bamoradian, K. (2003). “Constructing Meta-Models for Computer Experiments”. Journal of Quality Technology 35 (3), pp. 264–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. and Donev, A. (1992). Optimum Experimental Designs. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bayarri, M. J.; Berger, J. O.; Paulo, R.; Sacks, J.; Cafeo, J. A.; Cavendish, J.; Lin, C. H.; and Tu, J. (2007). “A Framework for Validation of Computer Models”. Technometrics 49 (2), pp. 138–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bursztyn, D. and Steinberg, D. M. (2006). “Comparison of Designs for Computer Experiments”. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 136, pp. 1103–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, V.; Tsui, K.-L.; Barton, R.; and Meckensheime, M. (2006). “A Review on Design, Modeling and Applications of Computer Experiments”. IEE Transactions 38, pp. 273–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danehy, P.; Deloach, R.; and Cutler, A. (2002). “Application of Modern Design of Experiments to CARS Thermometry in a Supersonic Combustor.” AIAA-2002-2914 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, K. T. (1980). “The Uniform Design: Application of Number-Theoretic Methods in Experimental Design”. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica 3, pp. 363–372.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, K. T.; Li, R.; and Sudjianto, A. (2006). Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hickernell, F. J. (1998). “A Generalized Discrepancy and Quadrature Error Bound”. Mathematics of Computation 67, pp. 299–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, M. F.; Barton, R. R.; and Joshi, S. B. (2002). “Metamodeling: Radial Basis Functions, Versus Polynomials”. European Journal of Operational Research 138, pp. 142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jank, W. and Shmueli, G. (2007). “Modelling Concurrency of Events in On-Line Auctions via Spatiotemporal Semiparametric Models”. Applied Statistics 56, pp. 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. E.; Moore, L. M.; and Ylvisaker, D. (1990). “Minimax and Maximin Distance Design”. Journal for Statistical Planning and Inference 26, pp. 131–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. T.; Parker, P. A.; Montgomery, D. C.; Cutler, A. D.; Danehy, P. M.; and Rhew, R. D. (2009). “Design Strategies for Response Surface Models for the Study of Supersonic Combustion”. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 25, pp. 365–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, C.-W.; Lee, J.; and Queyranne, M. (1995). “An Exact Algorithm for Maximum Entropy Sampling”. Operations Research 43, pp. 684–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefvendahl, M. and Stocki, R. (2006). “A Study on Algorithms for Optimization of Latin Hypercubes”. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 136, pp. 3231–3247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, N. D.; Conover, W. J.; and Beckman, R. J. (1979). “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code”. Technometrics 21, pp. 239–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mease, D. and Bingham, D. (2006). “Latin Hyperrectangle Sampling for Computer Experiments”. Technometrics 48 (4), pp. 467–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C. (2002). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 2nd edition. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S.; Fowler, J. F.; Mackulak, G. T.; Keats, J. B.; and Carlyle, W. M. (2002). “D-Optimal Sequential Experiments for Generating A Simulation-Based Cycle Time–Throughput Curve”. Operations Research 50, pp. 981–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux, W.; Stander, N.; Gunther, F.; and Mullerschon, H. (2006). “Stochastic Analysis of Highly Non-Linear Structures”. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 65, pp. 1221–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, J.; Welch, W. J.; Mitchell, T. J.; and Wynn, H. P. (1989). “Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments”. Statistical Science 4 (4), pp. 409–423.
   Google Scholar
• Shewry, M. C. and Wynn, H. P. (1987). “Maximum Entropy Sampling”. Journal of Applied Statistics 14, pp. 898–914.
   Google Scholar
• Storlie, C. B. and Helton, J. C. (2008). “Multiple Predictor Smoothing Methods for Sensitivity Analysis: Example Results”. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93, pp. 55–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedder, S.; Bivolaru, D.; Danehy, P.; Weilk, M.; Beyrau, F.; Seeger, T.; and Cutler, A. (2007). “Characterization of a Combined CARS and Interferometric Rayleigh Scattering System.” AIAA-2007-871 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tyre, A.; Kerr, G. D.; Tenhumberg, B.; and Bull, M. (2007). “Identifying Mechanistic Models of Spatial Behaviour Using Pattern-Based Modelling: An Example from Lizard Home Ranges”. Ecological Modeling 208, p. 307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. and Fang, K. T. (1981). “A Note on Uniform Distribution and Experimental Design”. KeXue TongBao 26, pp. 485–489.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, W. J.; Buck, R. J.; Sacks, J.; Wynn, H. P.; Mitchell, T. J.; and Morris, M. D. (1992). “Screening, Predicting, and Computer Experiments”. Technometrics 34 (1), pp. 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahran, A.; Anderson-Cook, C. M.; and Myers, R. H. (2003). “Fraction of Design Space to Assess the Prediction Capability of Response Surface Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 35, pp. 377–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar