Publication Cover
Journal of Quality Technology
A Quarterly Journal of Methods, Applications and Related Topics
Volume 43, 2011 - Issue 2
58
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Measurement System Analysis for Binary Inspection: Continuous Versus Dichotomous Measurands

, &
Pages 99-112 | Published online: 21 Nov 2017

References

  • Automotive Industry Action Group (2003). Measurement Systems Analysis: Reference Manual, 3rd ed. Detroit, MI: Author.
  • Beavers, D. P.; Stamey, J. D.; and Bekele, B. N. (in press). “A Bayesian Model to Assess a Binary Measurement System When No Gold Standard System Is Available”. Journal of Quality Technology, to appear.
  • Boyles, R. A. (200. “Gauge Capability for Pass–Fail Inspection”. Technometrics 43, pp. 223–229.
  • Danila, O.; Steiner, S. H.; and MacKay, R. J. (2008). “Assessing a Binary Measurement System”. Journal of Quality Technology 40, pp. 310–318.
  • Danila, O.; Steiner, S. H.; and MacKay, R. J. (2010). “Assessment of a Binary Measurement System in Current Use”. Journal of Quality Technology 42, pp. 152–164.
  • De Mast, J. (2007). “Agreement and Kappa Type Indices”. The American Statistician 61, pp. 148–153.
  • De Mast, J. and Van Wieringen, W. N. (2007). “Measurement System Analysis for Categorical Data: Agreement and Kappa Type Indices”. Journal of Quality Technology 39, pp. 191–202.
  • De Mast, J. and Van Wieringen, W. N. (2010). “Modeling and Evaluating Repeatability and Reproducibility of Ordinal Classifications”. Technometrics 52, pp. 94–106.
  • Embretson, S. E. and Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. London: Law Erlbaum Associates.
  • Farnum, N. R. (1994). Modern Statistical Quality Control and Improvement. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
  • Hui, S. L. and Walter, S. D. (1980). “Estimating the Error Rates of Diagnostic Tests”. Biometrics 36, pp. 167–171.
  • International Organization for Standardization (1995). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 1st ed. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
  • Lindley, D. V. and Novick, M. R. (1981). “The Role of Exchangeability in Inference”. The Annals of Statistics 9, pp. 45–58.
  • Mawby, W. D. (2006). Make Your Destructive, Dynamic, and Attribute Measurement System Work for You. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
  • McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall.
  • Pepe, M. S. (2003). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Van Wieringen, W. N. (2005). “On Identifiability of Certain Latent Class Models”. Statistics and Probability Letters 75, pp. 211–218.
  • Van Wieringen, W. N. and De Mast, J. (2008). “Measurement System Analysis for Binary Data”. Technometrics 50, pp. 468–478.
  • Van Wieringen, W. N. and Van den Heuvel, E. R. (2005). “A Comparison of Methods for the Evaluation of Binary Measurement Systems”. Quality Engineering 17, pp. 495–507.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.