Optimal Design of Blocked Experiments in the Presence of Supplementary Information About the BlocksFootnote^∗

∗ The editorial review process for this paper was handled by the past editor, Douglas C. Montgomery.

References

• Atkinson, A. C. and Donev, A. N. (1989). “The Construction of Exact D-Optimum Experimental Designs with Application to Blocking Response Surface Designs”. Biometrika 76, pp. 515–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. C. and Donev, A. N. (1996). “Experimental Designs Optimally Balanced for Trend”. Technometrics 38, pp. 333–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.-S. (1990). “Construction of Run Orders of Factorial Designs”. In Statistical Design and Analysis of Industrial Experiments, Ghosh, S., ed., pp. 423–439. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.-S. and Jacroux, M. (1988). “The Construction of Trend-Free Run Orders of Two-Level Factorial Designs”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, pp. 1152–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.-S. and Steinberg, D. M. (1991). “Trend Robust Two-Level Factorial Designs”. Biometrika 78, pp. 325–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1980). “A Comparison of Algorithms for Constructing Exact D-Optimal Designs”. Technometrics 22, pp. 315–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1989). “Computer-Aided Blocking of Factorial and Response-Surface designs”. Technometrics 31, pp. 339–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D. and Thibodeau, L. A. (1980). “Marginally Restricted D-Optimal Designs”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75, pp. 366–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, J. A. (2002). Experiments with Mixtures: Designs, Models, and the Analysis of Mixture Data. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, C. and Wilcoxon, F. (1966). “Factorial 2p–q Plans Robust Against Linear and Quadratic Trends”. Technometrics 8, pp. 259–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorov, V. V. (1972). Theory of Optimal Experiments. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, P. (2002). The Optimal Design of Blocked and Split-plot Experiments. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Donev, A. N. (2006). “Blocking Response Surface Designs”. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51, pp. 1075–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Gilmour, S. (2012). “Analyzing Categorical Data from Split-Plot and Other Multi-Stratum Experiments.” Technometrics 54, pp. 340–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Jones, B. (2011). Design of Experiments: A Case-Study Approach. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, P.; Langhans, I.; and Vandebroek, M. (2006). “Practical Inference from Industrial Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 38, pp. 162–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2001). “D-Optimal Response Surface Designs in the Presence of Random Block Effects”. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 37, pp. 433–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2003). “D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs with Given Numbers and Sizes of Whole Plots”. Technometrics 45, pp. 235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2004). “Outperforming Completely Randomized Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 12–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. H. and Sloane, N. J. A. (1991a). “Computer-Generated Minimal (and Larger) Response-Surface Designs. I: The Sphere”. http://www2.research.att.com/njas/doc/doeh.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. H. and Sloane, N. J. A. (1991b). “Computer-Generated Minimal (and Larger) Response-Surface Designs. II: The Cube”. http://www2.research.att.com/njas/doc/meatball.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Harville, D. A. (1974). “Nearly Optimal Allocation of Experimental Units Using Observed Covariate Values”. Technometrics 16, pp. 589–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. M. (1960). “Experimental Designs to Adjust for Time Trends”. Technometrics 2, pp. 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. W. M. (1990). “Time Trends and Factorial Experiments”. Technometrics 32, pp. 275–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner, B. L. and Campbell, C. (1976). “Designing Experiments When Run Order Is Important”. Technometrics 18, pp. 249–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2007). “A Candidate-Set-Free Algorithm for Generating D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C: Applied Statistics 56, pp. 347–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2012). “I-Optimal Versus D-Optimal Split-Plot Response Surface Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 44, pp. 85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels, R.; Goos, P.; and Vandebroek, M. (2008). “Optimal Designs for Rating-Based Conjoint Experiments”. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 52, pp. 2369–2387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuri, A. I. (1996). “Response Surface Models with Mixed Effects”. Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 177–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letsinger, J. D.; Myers, R. H.; and Lentner, M. (1996). “Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures”. Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 381–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mee, R. W. and Romanova, A. V. (2010). “Constructing and Analyzing Two-Level Trend-Robust Designs”. Quality Engineering 22, pp. 306–316 and “Corrigendum”. Quality Engineering 23, 112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. K. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1995). “The Coordinate-Exchange Algorithm for Constructing Exact Optimal Experimental Designs”. Technometrics 37, pp. 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylona, K.; Goos, P.; and Jones, B. (2014). “Optimal Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments for Fixed Effects and Variance Component Estimation”. Technometrics 56, pp. 132–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtsheim, C. J. (1989). “On the Design of Experiments in the Presence of Fixed Covariates”. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 22, pp. 203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. F. (2005). Experimental Design for Formulation. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Vining, G. G.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2005). “Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure”. Journal of Quality Technology 37, pp. 115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. F. J. and Hamada, M. (2000). Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar