Planning Fatigue Tests for Polymer Composites

References

• ASTM D3479 (2012). “Test Method for Tension–Tension Fatigue of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials”. Technical report, ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E122 (2009). “Practice for Calculating Sample Size to Estimate, with Specified Precision, the Average for a Characteristic of a Lot or Process”. Technical report, ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E739 (2010). “Practice for Statistical Analysis of Linear or Linearized Stress-Life (S-N) and Strain-Life (σ-N) Fatigue Data”. Technical report, ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, E.; Canteli, A. F.; Esslinger, V.; and Thurlimann B. (1985). “Statistical Model for Fatigue Analysis of Wires, Strands and Cables”. In International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering Proceedings P-82/85, Zurich, pp. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, E. and Fernández-Canteli, A. (2009). A Unified Statistical Methodology for Modeling Fatigue Damage. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, E. and Hadi, A. S. (1995). “Modeling Lifetime Data with Application to Fatigue Models”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 (431), pp. 1041–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epaarachchi, J. A. (2006). “A Study on Estimation of Damage Accumulation of Glass Fibre Reinforced Plastic (GFRP) Composites Under a Block Loading Situation”. Composite Structures 75 (1-4), pp. 88–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epaarachchi, J. A. and Clausen, P. D. (2003). “An Empirical Model for Fatigue Behavior Prediction of Glass Fibre-Reinforced Plastic Composites for Various Stress Ratios and Test Frequencies”. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 34 (4), pp. 313–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y.; King, C.; Zhang, Y.; and Meeker, W. Q. (2015). “Bayesian Life Test Planning for the Log-Location Scale Family of Distributions”. Journal of Quality Technology 47, pp. 336–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y.; Ma, H.; and Meeker, W. Q. (2010). “A Tool for Evaluating Time-Varying-Stress Accelerated Life Test Plans with Log-Location-Scale Distributions”. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 59, pp. 620–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kensler, J. L.; Freeman, L. J.; and Vining, G. G. (2015). “Analysis of Reliability Experiments with Random Blocks and Subsampling”. Journal of Quality Technolog 47, pp. 235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohout, J. and Vĕchet, S. (2001). “A New Function for Fatigue Curves Characterization and Its Multiple Merits”. International Journal of Fatigue 23 (2), pp. 175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M. and Doganaksoy, N. (2014). “Batch Variability in Accelerated-Degradation Testing”. Journal of Quality Technology 46, pp. 171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M. and Meeker, W. Q. (2014). “Application of Bayesian Methods in Reliability Data Analyses”. Journal of Quality Technology 46, pp. 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M.; Meeker, W. Q.; and Thompson, R. B. (2014). “Physical Model-Assisted Probability of Detection of Flaws in Titanium Forgings Using Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation”. Technometrics 56, pp. 78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeker, W. Q. (1984). “A Comparison of Accelerated Life Test Plans for Weibull and Lognormal Distributions and Type I Censoring”. Technometrics 26 (2), pp. 157–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeter, C. A. and Meeker, W. Q. (1994). “Optimum Accelerated Life Tests with a Nonconstant Scale Parameter”. Technometrics 36 (1), pp. 71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, W. (1990). Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans, and Data Analysis. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, W. and Kielpinski, T. J. (1976). “Theory for Optimum Censored Accelerated Life Tests for Normal and Lognormal Life Distributions”. Technometrics 18 (1), pp. 105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, W. and Meeker, W. Q. (1978). “Theory for Optimum Accelerated Censored Life Tests for Weibull and Extreme Value Distributions. Technometrics 20 (2), pp. 171–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, R. and Yang, T. (2014). “Design and Evaluation of Accelerated Life Testing Plans with Dual Objectives. Journal of Quality Technology 46, pp. 114–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual, F. G. (2003). “Theory for Optimal Test Plans for the Random Fatigue-Limit Model”. Technometrics 45 (2), pp. 130–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual, F. G. (2006). “Accelerated Life Test Plans Robust to Misspecification of the Stress-Life Relationship”. Technometrics 48 (1), pp. 11–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual, F. G. and Meeker, W. Q. (1999). “Estimating Fatigue Curves with the Random Fatigue-Limit Model”. Technometrics 41 (4), pp. 277–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spindel, J. E. and Haibach, E. (1981). “Some Considerations in the Statistical Determination of the Shape of S-N Curves”. In Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Data, Little, R. E. and Ekvall, J. C., eds., pp. 89–113. ASTM STP 744, American Society for Testing and Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Weibull, W. (1949). “A Statistical Report of Fatigue Failure in Solids”. In Transactions, Vol. 27. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology of Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Wöhler, A. (1870). “Über die Festigkeitsversuche mit Eisen und Stahl”. Zeitschrift für Bauwesen 20, pp. 73–106.
   Google Scholar