Correlation-based dynamic sampling for online high dimensional process monitoring

References

• Auer, P., N. Cesa-Bianchi, and P. Fischer. 2002. Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem. Machine Learning 47 (2/3):235–56. doi: 10.1023/A:1013689704352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augusto, C. R. A., A. C. Fauth, C. E. Navia, H. Shigeouka, and K. H. Tsui. 2011. Connection among spacecrafts and ground level observations of small solar transient events. Experimental Astronomy 31 (2–3):177–97. doi: 10.1007/s10686-011-9242-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, O., L. E. Ghaoui, and A. d’Aspremont. 2008. Model selection through sparse maximum likelihood estimation for multivariate Gaussian or binary data. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9:485–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., and P. Qiu. 2009. Distribution-free cumulative sum control charts using bootstrap-based control limits. The Annals of Applied Statistics 3 (1):349–69. doi: 10.1214/08-AOAS197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., E. A. Elsayed, S. Kumara, J.-C. Lu, F. Niu, and J. Shi. 2006. Distributed sensing for quality and productivity improvements. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 3 (4):344–59. doi: 10.1109/TASE.2006.876610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchi, J., S. Gould, and D. Koller. 2012. Projected subgradient methods for learning sparse Gaussians. arXiv Preprint: 1206.3249.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1994. An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2008. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 9 (3):432–41. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, J., and L. D. Stone. 2001. Review of search theory: Advances and applications to search and rescue decision support. Report No. CG-D-15-01, Soza and Company Ltd., Fairfax, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Gut, A. 1988. Stopped random walks - Limit theorems and applications. Applied probability. A series of the applied probability trust, 5. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C.-J., I. S. Dhillon, P. K. Ravikumar, and M. A. Sustik. 2011. Sparse inverse covariance matrix estimation using quadratic approximation. In Advances in neural information processing systems, ed. J. Shawe-Taylor, R. S. Zemel, P. L. Bartlett, F. Pereira, and K. Q. Weinberger, 2330-2338. Red Hook: Curran Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ishii, T. T., T. Kawate, Y. Nakatani, S. Morita, K. Ichimoto, and S. Masuda. 2013. High-speed imaging system for solar-flare research at Hida Observatory. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 65 (2):39. doi: 10.1093/pasj/65.2.:39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, R., C.-J. Chang, and J. Shi. 2012. Sequential measurement strategy for wafer geometric profile estimation. IIE Transactions 44 (1):1–12. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2011.557030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, E., and I. Ben-Gal. 2013. Probabilistic search for tracking targets: Theory and modern applications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, T. L. 1987. Adaptive treatment allocation and the multi-armed bandit problem. The Annals of Statistics 15 (3):1091–114. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176350495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, T. L., and H. Robbins. 1985. Asymptotically efficient adaptive allocation rules. Advances in Applied Mathematics 6 (1):4–22. doi: 10.1016/0196-8858(85)90002-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., and J. Jin. 2010. Optimal sensor allocation by integrating causal models and set-covering algorithms. IIE Transactions 42 (8):564–76. doi: 10.1080/07408170903232597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, H. B., V. T. Lam, M. C. Foo, and Y. Zeng. 2006. An adaptive distributed resource allocation scheme for sensor networks. In Mobile ad-hoc and sensor networks. MSN 2006, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4325, eds. J. Cao, I. Stojmenovic, X. Jia, and S. K. Das, 770–781. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, K., Y. Mei, and J. Shi. 2015. An adaptive sampling strategy for online high-dimensional process monitoring. Technometrics 57 (3):305–19. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2014.947005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K., and J. Shi. 2013. Objective-oriented optimal sensor allocation strategy for process monitoring and diagnosis by multivariate analysis in a Bayesian network. IIE Transactions 45 (6):630–43. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2012.725505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorden, G. 1971. Procedures for reacting to a change in distribution. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 42 (6):1897–1908.
   Google Scholar
• Mandroli, S. S., A. K. Shrivastava, and Y. Ding. 2006. A survey of inspection strategy and sensor distribution studies in discrete-part manufacturing processes. IIE Transactions 38 (4):309–28. doi: 10.1080/07408170500327352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei, Y. 2010. Efficient scalable schemes for monitoring a large number of data streams. Biometrika 97 (2):419–33. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asq010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. 2009. Introduction to statistical quality control. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, E. N. 1963. The solar-flare phenomenon and the theory of reconnection and annihiliation of magnetic fields. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 8:177. doi: 10.1086/190087.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. L., J. Trindade, F. Gonçalves, L. Suresh, D. Barbosa, and T. Vazão. 2014. A wireless sensor network for monitoring volcano-seismic signals. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 14 (12):3123. doi: 10.5194/nhess-14-3123-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pignatiello, J. J., and G. C. Runger. 1990. Comparisons of multivariate CUSUM charts. Journal of Quality Technology 22 (3):173–86. doi: 10.1080/00224065.1990.11979237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheinberg, K., S. Ma, and D. Goldfarb. 2010. Sparse inverse covariance selection via alternating linearization methods. In Advances in neural information processing systems, ed. J. D. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. S. Zemel, and A. Culotta, 2101–2109. Red Hook: Curran Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Scheinberg, K., and I. Rish. 2009. SINCO-a greedy coordinate ascent method for sparse inverse covariance selection problem. IBM Research Report RC24837. IBM Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A., X. Xian, F. Tsung, and K. Liu. 2018. A spatial adaptive sampling procedure for online monitoring of big data streams. Journal of Quality Technology 50 (4):329–43. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2018.1507560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xian, X., R. Archibald, B. Mayer, K. Liu, and J. Li. 2019. An effective online data monitoring and saving strategy for large-scale climate simulations. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 16 (3): 330–346. doi: 10.1080/16843703.2017.1414112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xian, X., A. Wang, and K. Liu. 2018. A nonparametric adaptive sampling strategy for online monitoring of big data streams. Technometrics 60 (1):14–25. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2017.1317291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., J. Huang, and R. Willett. 2013. Change-point detection for high-dimensional time series with missing data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 7 (1):12–27. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2012.2234082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, H., K. Paynabar, and J. Shi. 2018. Real-time monitoring of high-dimensional functional data streams via spatio-temporal smooth sparse decomposition. Technometrics 60 (2):181–97. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2017.1346522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, X., H. Yan, J. G. Park, Z. Liang, and J. Shi. 2018. A wavelet-based penalized mixed-effects decomposition for multichannel profile detection of in-line Raman spectroscopy. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 15 (3):1258–71. doi: 10.1109/TASE.2017.2772218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoghi, M., and M. Kahaei. 2010. Adaptive sensor selection in wireless sensor networks for target tracking. IET Signal Processing 4 (5):530–6. doi: 10.1049/iet-spr.2008.0205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar