What’s Gender Got to Do With It? Sexual Double Standards and Power in Heterosexual College Hookups

References

• Alexander, M. G., & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 27–35. doi:10.1080/00224490309552164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, R., & Risman, B. (2013). A double standard for “hooking up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research, 42, 1191–1206. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, F. H. (1933). Institutional behavior. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435–462. doi:10.1177/0003122412445802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & England, P. (2010). Is hooking up bad for young women? Contexts, 9, 22–27. doi:10.1525/ctx.2010.9.3.22
   Google Scholar
• Bogle, K. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date? Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26. doi:10.1080/00224490309552163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currier, D. (2013). Strategic ambiguity: Protecting emphasized femininity and hegemonic masculinity in the hookup culture. Gender and Society, 27, 704–727. doi:10.1177/0891243213493960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 36, 346–359. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2010.488118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, T. D. (2013). Gender roles and pressure to be truthful: The bogus pipeline modifies gender differences in sexual but not non-sexual behavior. Sex Roles, 68, 401–414. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0266-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flack, W. F., Jr., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D’Aureli, N. R., Gigliotti, S. N., & Stine, E. R. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139–157. doi:10.1177/0886260506295354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmartin, S. K. (2006). Changes in college women’s attitudes toward sexual intimacy. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 429–454. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00501.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. New York, NY: Institute for American Values.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, K., & Faulkner, S. L. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles, 53, 239–251. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-5682-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender and Society, 23, 589–616. doi:10.1177/0891243209345829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Marks, M. J. (2009). Common versus uncommon sexual acts: Evidence for the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 60, 357–365. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9542-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalish, R., & Kimmel, M. (2011). Hooking up: Hot hetero sex or the new numb normative? Australian Feminist Studies, 26, 137–151. doi:10.1080/08164649.2011.546333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J., & Tirone, V. (2010). Going along with it: Sexually coercive partner behavior predicts dating women’s compliance with unwanted sex. Violence Against Women, 16, 730–742. doi:10.1177/1077801210374867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Komter, A. (1989). Hidden power in marriage. Gender and Society, 3, 187–216. doi:10.1177/089124389003002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 143–164. doi:10.1177/019027250907200205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. A., Granato, H., Blayney, J. A., Lostutter, T. W., & Kilmer, J. R. (2012). Predictors of hooking up sexual behaviors and emotional reactions among U.S. college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1219–1229. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9817-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. J. (2008). Evaluations of sexually active men and women under divided attention: A social cognitive approach to the sexual double standard. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 84–91. doi:10.1080/01973530701866664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175–186. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2006). Confirmation bias and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 54, 19–26. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-8866-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2007). The impact of social interaction on the sexual double standard. Social Influence, 2, 29–54. doi:10.1080/15534510601154413
   Google Scholar
• Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (2002). Reconceptualizing the sexual double standard. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 13, 63–83. doi:10.1300/J056v13n02_05
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J. J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 321–330. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J. J., Quirk, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2014). Toward a more complete understanding of reactions to hooking up among college women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 40(5), 396–409. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2012.751074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. A., Elliott, S., & Webber, G. R. (2011). Casual hookups to formal dates: Refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard. Gender and Society, 25, 545–568. doi:10.1177/0891243211418642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, I. L. (1960). Premarital sexual standards in America. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender and Society, 18, 429–450. doi:10.1177/0891243204265349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaluk, J. K., & Milhausen, R. R. (2012). Factors influencing university students’ explicit and implicit double standards. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 464–476. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.569976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schewe, P. A. (2002). Guidelines for developing rape prevention and risk reduction interventions. In P. A. Schewe (Ed.), Preventing violence in relationships: Interventions across the life span (pp. 107–136). Washington, DC: APA Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, M., Godwin, S., Holden, D., Schrock, D., Thompson, S., & Wolkomir, M. (2000). Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis. Social Forces, 79, 419–452. doi:10.1093/sf/79.2.419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struckman-Johnson, C., Struckman-Johnson, D., & Anderson, P. B. (2003). Tactics of sexual coercion: When men and women won’t take no for an answer. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 76–86. doi:10.1080/00224490309552168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenbaum, L. (2000). Slut! Growing up with a bad reputation. New York, NY: Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, L., & Heldman, C. (2012). Hooking up and opting out: Negotiating sex in the first year of college. In L. M. Carpenter & J. DeLamater (Eds.), Sex for life: From virginity to Viagra: How sexuality changes throughout our lives (pp. 128–145). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, E. (2002). Fast girls: Teenage tribes and the myth of the slut. New York, NY: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. O., Norton, D. L., & Matusek, J. A. (2010). Predicting verbal coercion following sexual refusal during a hookup: Diverging gender patterns. Sex Roles, 62, 647–660. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9763-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeater, E. A., Lenberg, K. L., Avina, C., Rinehart, J. K., & O’Donohue, W. (2008). When social situations take a turn for the worse: Situational and interpersonal risk factors for sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 59, 151–163. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9437-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar