Has the American Public’s Interest in Information Related to Relationships Beyond “The Couple” Increased Over Time?

References

• Agnew, C. R., & Loving, T. J. (1998). The role of social desirability in self-reported condom use attitudes and intentions. AIDS and Behavior, 2(3), 229–239. doi:10.1023/A:1022189801933
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, M. G., & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self‐reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 27–35. doi:10.1080/00224490309552164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, M. (2013). Rewriting the rules: An integrative guide to love, sex, and relationships. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blasband, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1985). Sexual exclusivity versus openness in gay male couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14(5), 395–412. doi:10.1007/BF01542001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonello, K., & Cross, M. C. (2009). Gay monogamy: I love you but I can’t have sex with only you. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(1), 117–139. doi:10.1080/00918360903445962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris, C. T. (2014). Torn between two lovers? Lay perceptions of polyamorous individuals. Psychology & Sexuality, 5(3), 258–267. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.779311
   Google Scholar
• Cole, C. L., & Spanier, G. B. (1973). Induction into mate‐swapping: A review. Family Process, 12(3), 279–290. doi:10.1111/famp.1973.12.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., & Moors, A. C. (2014). More oxygen please! How polyamorous relationship strategies might oxygenate marriage. Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 56–63. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.876908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Ziegler, A. (2013). The fewer the merrier: Assessing stigma surrounding non-normative romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 1–30. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2012.01286.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Valentine, B. (2013). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 124–141. doi:10.1177/1088868312467087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copen, C., Daniels, K., Vespa, J., & Mosher, W. (2012). First marriages in the United States: Data from the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth. National Health Statistics Reports (No. 49). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Day, M. V., Kay, A. C., Holmes, J. G., & Napier, J. L. (2011). System justification and the defense of committed relationship ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 291–306. doi:10.1037/a0023197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2–3), 57–83. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2005.9682918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 1–41. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.863723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, H. E. (1989). Evolution of human serial pairbonding. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 78(3), 331–354. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, T. D. (2013). Gender roles and pressure to be truthful: The bogus pipeline modifies gender differences in sexual but not non-sexual behavior. Sex Roles, 68(7–8), 401–414. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0266-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi, M. H., Patel, R. S., Brammer, L., Smolinski, M. S., & Brilliant, L. (2009). Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature, 457(7232), 1012–1014. doi:10.1038/nature07634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google. (2015). Google trends. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/trends#topic=4365599
   Google Scholar
• Gotta, G., Green, R. J., Rothblum, E., Solomon, S., Balsam, K., & Schwartz, P. (2011). Heterosexual, lesbian, and gay male relationships: A comparison of couples in 1975 and 2000. Family Process, 50(3), 353–376. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01365.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunt-Mejer, K., & Campbell, C. (2016). Around consensual nonmonogamies: Assessing attitudes toward nonexclusive relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 53(1), 45–53. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1010193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, A. (2015). Saying “I don’t” to matrimony: An investigation of why long-term heterosexual cohabitors choose not to marry. Journal of Family Issues. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0192513X15576200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jena, A. B., Karaca-Mandic, P., Weaver, L., & Seabury, S. A. (2013). Predicting new diagnoses of HIV infection using Internet search engine data. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 56, 1352–1353. doi:10.1093/cid/cit022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, R. J. (1985). Swinging: A replication and test of a theory. Journal of Sex Research, 21(2), 199–205. doi:10.1080/00224498509551258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juzwlak, R. (2012, July 26). Showtime’s Polyamory is trashy, profound, and the best reality show on TV. Gawker. Retrieved from http://gawker.com/5929318/showtimes-polyamory-is-trashy-profound-and-the-best-reality-show-on-tv
   Google Scholar
• Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How blogs, MySpace, YouTube, and the rest of today’s user-generated media are destroying our economy, our culture, and our values. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• LaSala, M. C. (2004). Extradyadic sex and gay male couples: Comparing monogamous and nonmonogamous relationships. Families in Society: Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 85(3), 405–412. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.1502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B. K. (2010). Epidemiologic research and Web 2.0—The user-driven Web. Epidemiology, 21(6), 760–763. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181f5a75f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmiller, J. J. (2015). A comparison of sexual health history and practices among monogamous and consensually nonmonogamous sexual partners. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(10), 2022–2028. doi:10.1111/jsm.12987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2015). Do American states with more religious or conservative populations search more for sexual content on Google? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 137–147. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0361-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markey, P., & Markey, C. (2010). Changes in pornography-seeking behaviors following political elections: An examination of the challenge hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(6), 442–446. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markey, P., & Markey, C. (2013). Seasonal variation in Internet keyword searches: A proxy assessment of sex mating behaviors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(4), 515–521. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9996-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. J. (2010). Internet monitoring of suicide risk in the population. Journal of Affective Disorders, 122(3), 277–279. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellon, J. (2014). Internet search data and issue salience: The properties of Google Trends as a measure of issue salience. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24(1), 45–72. doi:10.1080/17457289.2013.846346
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. E., Bartholomew, K., & Cobb, R. J. (2014). Need fulfillment in polyamorous relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 51(3), 329–339. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.742998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, I. (2013, November 11). Monogamous: To be or not to be? Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/irene-monroe/monogamous-to-be-or-not-to-be_b_4228423.html
   Google Scholar
• Moors, A. C., Conley, T. D., Edelstein, R. S., & Chopik, W. J. (2015). Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(2), 222–240. doi:10.1177/0265407514529065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., Rubin, J., & Conley, T. D. (2013). Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual non-monogamy: Robust and worthy of additional research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 52–69. doi:10.1111/asap.2013.13.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A. C., Rubin, J. D., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Conley, T. D. (2014). It’s not just a gay male thing: Sexual minority women and men are equally attracted to consensual non-monogamy. Journal für Psychologie, 22(1), 38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. (2014, March 31). Tales from the millennials’ sexual revolution. Rolling Stone. Retrieved from http://www.rollingstone.com/feature/millennial-sexual-revolution-relationships-marriage
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, M. (2011, June 30). Married, with infidelities. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/03/magazine/infidelity-will-keep-us-together.html?pagewanted=all
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 653–663. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, S. (2013, February 14). New sexual revolution: Polyamory may be good for you. Scientific American. Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-sexual-revolution-polyamory/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2014). Internet project survey: Internet user demographics. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/latest-stats/
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, K., Brenner, J., & Rainie, L. (2012). Search engine use 2012. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Search_Engine_Use_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reich, A. (2014, November 18). A glimpse into the lives of couples with open marriages. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/05/the-new-i-do-excerpt_n_6111242.html
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, A., & Barker, M. (2007). Hot bi babes and feminist families: Polyamorous women speak out. Lesbian and Gay Psychology Review, 8(2), 141–151.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Conley, T. D. (2014). On the margins: Considering diversity among consensually non-monogamous relationships. Journal Für Psychologie, 22(1), 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. H. (2001). Alternative lifestyles revisited, or whatever happened to swingers, group marriages, and communes? Journal of Family Issues, 22(6), 711–726. doi:10.1177/019251301022006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(2), 247–275. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shernoff, M. (2006). Negotiated nonmonogamy and male couples. Family Process, 45(4), 407–418. doi:10.1111/famp.2006.45.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, L. D. (1978). Alternative marital and family forms: Their relative attractiveness to college students and correlates of willingness to participate in nontraditional forms. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 493–503. doi:10.2307/350930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagler, M. J. (2010). Sex differences in jealousy: Comparing the influence of previous infidelity among college students and adults. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(4), 353–360. doi:10.1177/1948550610374367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treas, J., & Giesen, D. (2000). Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(1), 48–60. doi:10.1111/jomf.2000.62.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar