Positive Feelings After Casual Sex: The Role of Gender and Traditional Gender-Role Beliefs

REFERENCES

• Abramson, P. R., & Pinkerton, S. D. (2002). With pleasure: Thoughts on the nature of human sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 435–462. doi:10.1177/0003122412445802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & England, P. (2010). Is hooking up bad for young women? Contexts, 9(3), 22–27. doi:10.1525/ctx.2010.9.3.22
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity. Psychological Monographs, 70(9), 1–70. doi:10.1037/h0093718
   Google Scholar
• Baber, K. M., & Tucker, C. J. (2006). The Social Roles Questionnaire: A new approach to measuring attitudes toward gender. Sex Roles, 54(1), 459–467. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9018-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barriger, M., & Velez-Blasini, S. J. (2013). Descriptive and injunctive social norm overestimation in hooking up and their role as predictors of hook-up activity in a college student sample. Journal of Sex Research, 50(1), 84–94. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.607928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersamin, M. M., Zamboanga, B. L., Schwartz, S. J., Donnellan, M. B., Hudson, M., Weisskirch, R. S., & Caraway, S. J. (2014). Risky business: Is there an association between casual sex and mental health among emerging adults? Journal of Sex Research, 51(1), 43–51. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.772088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogle, K. A. (2007). The shift from dating to hooking up in college: What scholars have missed. Sociology Compass, 1(2), 775–788. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00031.x
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62(9), 661–669. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. (2008). The morning after the night before: Affective reactions to one-night stands among mated and unmated women and men. Human Nature, 19, 157–173. doi:10.1007/s12110-008-9036-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. R., & Swift, C. O. (2006). Attributional comparisons across biases and leader-member exchange status. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(3), 393–408.
   Google Scholar
• Caron, S. L., Davis, C. M., Halteman, W. A., & Stickle, M. (1993). Predictors of condom-related behaviors among first-year college students. Journal of Sex Research, 30(3), 252–259. doi:10.1080/00224499309551709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. (2007). Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika, 72(2), 263–268. doi:10.1007/s11336-006-1560-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D. (2010). Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 309–329. doi:10.1037/a0022152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., & Moors, A. C. (2012). Backlash from the bedroom stigma mediates gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 392–407. doi:10.1177/0361684312467169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copen, E. E., Daniels, K., Vespa, J., & Mosher, W. D. (2012). First marriages in the United States: Data from the 2006–2008 National Survey of Family Growth ( National Health Statistics Reports No. 49). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 13–26. doi:10.1080/00224490309552163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltey, K. M., & Poloma, M. M. (1991). From sex differences to gender role beliefs: Exploring effects on six dimensions of religiosity. Sex Roles, 25(3), 181–193. doi:10.1007/BF00289853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(5), 1105–1119. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today: An Institute for American Values report to the Independent Women’s Forum. New York, NY: Institute for American Values.
   Google Scholar
• Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 255–267. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S., & Dickson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent and Family Health, 3(3), 103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S., & Reich, D. A. (2006). The Brief Sexual Attitudes Scale. Journal of Sex Research, 43(1), 76–86. doi:10.1080/00224490609552301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold, E. S., & Mewhinney, D. A. K. (1993). Gender differences in casual sex and AIDS prevention: A survey of dating bars. Journal of Sex Research, 30(1), 36–42. doi:10.1080/00224499309551676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlbert, D. F. (1991). The role of assertiveness in female sexuality: A comparative study between sexually assertive and sexually nonassertive women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 17(3), 183–190. doi:10.1080/00926239108404342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynie, M., Lydon, J. E., Côté, S., & Wiener, S. (1998). Relational sexual scripts and women’s condom use: The importance of internalized norms. Journal of Sex Research, 35(4), 370–380. doi:10.1080/00224499809551955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Marks, M. J. (2009). Common vs. uncommon sexual acts: Evidence for the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 60(5), 357–365. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9542-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C. (2012). Sexism in practice: Feminist ethics evaluating the hookup culture. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 28(2), 27–48. doi:10.2979/jfemistudreli.28.2.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. Journal of Sex Research, 40(2), 129–133. doi:10.1080/00224490309552174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, T. G. J. (2010). Everything’s better in moderation: Young women’s gender role attitudes and risky sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46(5), 437–443. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. A., Granato, H., Blayney, J. A., Lostutter, T. W., & Kilmer, J. R. (2011). Predictors of hooking up sexual behavior and emotional reactions among U.S. college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(5), 1219–1229. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9817-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucke, J. (1998). Gender roles and sexual behavior among young women. Sex Roles, 39(3), 273–297. doi:10.1023/A:1018806622585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, H., Manning, W., Giordano, P., & Longmore, M. (2013). Predictors of heterosexual casual sex among young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(4), 585–593. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0051-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, A., & Offman, A. (2009). The interrelationships between sexual self-esteem, sexual assertiveness, and sexual satisfaction. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 18(1–2), 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46(11–12), 359–375. doi:10.1023/A:1020488928736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 321–330. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 653–663. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of “casual” sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(5), 639–661. doi:10.1177/0265407502195006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, A. P. & Hurlbert, M.K. (1999). Test-retest reliability of the Hurlbert Index of Sexual Assertiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 31–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 21–138. doi:10.1037/a0017504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. N. G. (2003). The sources of gender role attitudes among Christian and Muslim Arab-American women. Sociology of Religion, 64(2), 207–222. doi:10.2307/3712371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, P. C., & Dreyer, C. S. (1999). Lust? Love? Status? Young adults’ motives for engaging in casual sex. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 11(1), 1–24. doi:10.1300/J056v11n01_01
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 157. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer, C. L., Hosterman, S. J., Gillen, M. M., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2005). Are traditional gender role attitudes associated with risky sexual behavior and condom-related beliefs? Sex Roles, 52(5), 311–324. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-2675-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson, R. D. (2010). Hooking up in young adulthood: A review of factors influencing the sexual behavior of college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 24(2), 98–115. doi:10.1080/87568220903558596
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. M., Kline, J., & Wasserman, T. H. (1995). Low-investment copulation: Sex differences in motivations and emotional reactions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(1), 25–51. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(94)00027-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., & O’Boyle, E. H., Jr. (2008). Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 233–242. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. J. (2012). Pornography consumption, cocaine use, and casual sex among U.S. adults. Psychological Reports, 111(1), 305–310. doi:10.2466/18.02.13.PR0.111.4.305-310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar