The Effects of Sex and Gender-Role Characteristics on Facets of Sociosexuality in Heterosexual Young Adults

References

• Alanko, K., Santtila, P., Salo, B., Jern, P., Johansson, A., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2011). Testing causal models of the relationship between childhood gender atypical behaviour and parent–child relationship. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 214–233. doi:10.1348/2044-835X.002004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asendorpf, J. B., & Penke, L. (2005). A mature evolutionary psychology demands careful conclusions about sex differences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 275–276. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05220058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athenstaedt, U. (2003). On the content and structure of the gender role self-concept: Including gender-stereotypical behaviors in addition to traits. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 309–318. doi:10.1111/pwqu.2003.27.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auster, C. J., & Ohm, S. C. (2000). Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 43, 499–528. doi:10.1023/A:1007119516728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bancroft, J., Graham, C. A., Janssen, E., & Sanders, S. A. (2009). The dual control model: Current status and future directions. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 121–142. doi:10.1080/00224490902747222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196–205. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.45.2.196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A., Granger, D. A., Mazur, A., & Kivlighan, K. T. (2006). Testosterone and social behavior. Social Forces, 85, 167–191. doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L., Adair, L., & Monk, K. (2014). Explaining sex differences in reactions to relationship infidelities: Comparisons of the roles of sex, gender, beliefs, attachment, and sociosexual orientation. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 73–96. doi:10.1177/147470491401200106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, T., Gillaspy, J. A., & Thompson, B. (1997). The factor structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI): Confirmatory factor analysis of long and short forms. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 118–124. doi:10.1177/0013164497057001008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D., Janssen, E., Graham, C., Vorst, H., & Wicherts, J. (2008). Women’s scores on the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES): Gender similarities and differences. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 36–48. doi:10.1080/00224490701808076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, L. F., Vafei, A., Guerra, R., Friere, A., & Phillips, S. P. (2013). Gender differences: Examination of the 12-item Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI-12) in an older Brazilian population. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e76356. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, N. E., & Alexander, G. M. (2011). The association between 2D:4D ratios and sociosexuality: A failure to replicate. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 587–595. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9715-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, N., Fuqua, D. R., & Newman, J. L. (2007). Hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 818–832. doi:10.1177/0013164406299106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. P. (2006). Are the correlates of sociosexuality different for men and women? Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1321–1327. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, A., Mulhern, G., Maltby, J., & Wood, A. M. (2009). The short-form BSRI: Instrumentality, expressiveness, and gender associations among a United Kingdom sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 384–387. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 788–827). New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelstein, R. S., Chopik, W. J., & Kean, E. L. (2011). Sociosexuality moderates the association between relationship status and testosterone in men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 60, 248–255. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, B. J., & Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Sex Research, 27, 527–555. doi:10.1080/00224499009551579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, B., Brewer, G., Fehl, G., & Neave, N. (2007). Instrumentality and lifetime number of sexual partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 747–756. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0000337X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, N. M., & Pichon, L. C. (2014). Gender roles, sociosexuality, and sexual behavior among US Black women. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: An Open Access Journal, 2(1), 171–182. doi:10.1080/21642850.2014.882236
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Singer Foust, M. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 233–256. doi:10.1177/109442819923002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrick, S., Hendrick, C., Slapion-Foote, M. J., & Foote, F. H. (1985). Gender differences in sexual attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1630–1642. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, R. M., & Borders, L. D. (2001). Twenty-five years after the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A reassessment and new issues regarding classification variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. J., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2007). The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: Toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 382–391. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, K. S., Díaz-Morales, J. F., Vollmer, C., & Randler, C. (2014). Morningness–eveningness and sociosexuality: Evening females are less restricted than morning ones. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 13–17. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002). The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) Scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 114–126. doi:10.1080/00224490209552130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennair, L. E. O., Schmitt, D., Fjeldavli, Y. L., & Harlem, S. K. (2009). Sex differences in sexual desires and attitudes in Norwegian samples. Interpersona, 3(Suppl.1), 1–32. doi:10.5964/ijpr.v3isupp1.67
   Google Scholar
• Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Konik, J., & Stewart, A. J. (2004). Sexual identity development in the context of compulsory heterosexuality. Journal of Personality, 72, 815–844. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00281.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, A. M., & Harris, C. (2002). Desirability of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory items for women and men: A comparison between African Americans and European Americans. Sex Roles, 47, 259–271. doi:10.1023/A:1021386727269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaper, C. (2000). The social construction and socialization of gender. In P. H. Miller & E. K. Scholnick (Eds.), Towards a feminist developmental psychology (pp. 127–152). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 631–651. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9242-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, C., & King, E. (2006). Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: A systematic review. The Lancet, 368, 1581–1586. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69662-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, C. M., & Strough, J. (2009). Sex segregation in friendships and normative contexts across the life span. Developmental Review, 29, 201–220. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, P. H., & Josephs, R. A. (2011). Social endocrinology: Hormones and social motivation. In D. Dunning (Ed.), The handbook of social motivation (pp. 171–190). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meskó, N., Láng, A., & Kocsor, F. (2014). The Hungarian version of Sociosexual Orientation Inventory Revised (SOI-R): Sex and age differences. Interpersona, 8, 85–99. doi:10.5964/ijpr.v8i1.130
   Google Scholar
• Mikach, S. M., & Bailey, J. M. (1999). What distinguishes women with unusually high numbers of sex partners? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 141–150. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00045-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2009). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Ostovich, J. M., & Sabini, J. (2004). How are sociosexuality, sex drive, and lifetime number of sexual partners related? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1255–1266. doi:10.1177/0146167204264754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzebon, J. A., Visser, B. A., & Bogaert, A. F. (2015). Vocational interests, personality, and sociosexuality as indicators of a general masculinity/femininity factor. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 291–296. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M. E., Pound, N., Dunn, J., Hopkins, S., & Kang, J. (2013). Body shape preferences: Associations with rater body shape and sociosexuality. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52532. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puts, D. A., Pope, L. E., Hill, A. K., Cárdenas, R. A., Welling, L. L. M., Wheatley, J. R., & Breedlove, S. M. (2015). Fulfilling desire: Evidence for negative feedback between men’s testosterone, sociosexual psychology, and sexual partner number. Hormones and Behavior, 70, 14–21. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammsayer, T. H., & Troche, S. J. (2013). The relationship between sociosexuality and aspects of body image in men and women: A structural equation modeling approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1173–1179. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0114-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sczesny, S., Bosak, J., Diekman, A. B., & Twenge, J. M. (2007). Dynamics of sex-role stereotypes. In Y. Kashima, K. Fiedler, & P. Freytag (Eds.), Stereotype dynamics: Language-based approaches to the formation, maintenance, and transformation of stereotypes (pp. 135–161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A., Wilson, C. L., & Winterheld, H. A. (2004). Sociosexuality and romantic relationships. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 87–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624–635. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39. doi:10.1037/h0076857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmers, A. D., & Chivers, M. L. (2012). Sociosexuality and sexual arousal. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 21, 135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, D. D., Menon, M., Menon, M., Spatta, B. C., Hodges, E. V., & Perry, D. G. (2010). The intrapsychics of gender: A model of self-socialization. Psychological Review, 117, 601–622. doi:10.1037/a0018936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troche, S. J., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2011). Eine revision des deutschsprachigen Bem Sex-Role Inventory [A revision of the German Bem Sex Role Inventory]. Klinische Diagnostik Und Evaluation, 4, 262–283.
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325. doi:10.1007/BF02766650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Anders, S. M. (2013). Beyond masculinity: Testosterone, gender/sex, and human social behavior in a comparative context. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 34, 198–210. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Anders, S. M., & Watson, N. V. (2006). Social neuroendocrinology: Effects of social contexts and behaviors on sex steroids in humans. Human Nature, 17, 212–237. doi:10.1007/s12110-006-1018-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voracek, M. (2005). Shortcomings of the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory: Can psychometrics inform evolutionary psychology? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 296–297. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05430058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, D. F., Tokar, D. M., & Fischer, A. R. (2000). What are eight popular masculinity-related instruments measuring? Underlying dimensions and their relations to sociosexuality. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 1, 98–108. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.1.2.98
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. R. (1997). Women, men, and gender: Ongoing debates. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, G. D., & Bryan, A. (2007). Sociosexual attitudes and behaviors: Why two factors are better than one. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 917–922. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerlund, M., Santtila, P., Johansson, A., Varjonen, M., Witting, K., Jern, P., … Sandnabba, N. K. (2010). Does unrestricted sociosexual behaviour have a shared genetic basis with sexual coercion? Psychology, Crime, and Law, 16, 5–23. doi:10.1080/10683160802621925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. D. (1997). Gender differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 27–31. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00180-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 629–667). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 55–123. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodley, X. M., & Lockard, M. (2016). Womanism and snowball sampling: Engaging marginalized populations in holistic research. The Qualitative Report, 21, 321–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost, M. R., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2006). Gender differences in the enactment of sociosexuality: An examination of implicit social motives, sexual fantasies, coercive sexual attitudes and aggressive sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 163–173. doi:10.1080/00224490609552311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zosuls, K. M., Miller, C. F., Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (2011). Gender development research in Sex Roles: Historical trends and future directions. Sex Roles, 64, 826–842. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9902-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar