Demographic Comparison of American Individuals in Polyamorous and Monogamous Relationships

REFERENCES

• Balzarini, R. N., Campbell, L., Kohut, T., Holmes, B. M., Lehmiller, J. J., Harman, J. J., & Atkins, N. (2017). Perceptions of primary and secondary relationships in polyamory. PLoS ONE, 12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzarini, R. N., Shumlich, E., Kohut, T., & Campbell, L. (2018). Dimming the halo around monogamy: Re-assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships as a function of personal relationship. Frontiers in Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, M., & Langdridge, D. (2010). Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities, 13, 748–772. doi:10.1177/1363460710384645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, G. R., Braimoh, J., Scheim, A. I., & Dharma, C. (2017). Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations. PLoS ONE, 12, e0178043. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, J. D. (2007). Beneath the veil of mormonism: Uncovering the truth about polygamy in the United States and Canada. The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 38, 615–640.
   Google Scholar
• Broussard, K. A., Warner, R. H., & Pope, A. R. (2017). Too many boxes, or not enough? Preferences for how we ask about gender in cisgender, LGB, and gender-diverse samples. Sex Roles, 78, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census Bureau (2016). Quick facts. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045216.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., & Moors, A. C. (2014). More oxygen please!: How polyamorous relationship strategies might oxygenate marriage. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 56–63. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.876908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Ziegler, A. (2013). The fewer the merrier?: Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13, 1–30. doi:10.1111/asap.2013.13.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J., & Valentine, B. (2012). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 124–141.
   Google Scholar
• Conron, K. J., Scott, G., Stowell, G. S., & Landers, S. J. (2012). Transgender health in Massachusetts: Results from a household probability sample of adults. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 118–122. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core Team, R. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D. W. (2016) Exploring the health of consensually non-monogamous individuals: A mixed methods approach. ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK. Retrieved from https://shareok.org/handle/11244/47030
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D. W. (Personal communication, October 6, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D. W., Fleckenstein, J., & Bergstrand, C. R. (2013). “What do polys want?: An overview of the 2012 loving more survey.” Loving More Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.lovemore.com/polyamorousamory-articles/2012-lovingmore-polyamory-survey/. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Duvall-Antonacopoulos, K., MacRae, L., & Paetsch, J. J. (2005). An international review of polygamy: Legal and policy implications for Canada. Polygamy in Canada: Legal and Social Implications for Women and Children.
   Google Scholar
• Eastwick, P. W. (2013). Cultural influences on attraction. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), Handbook of close relationships (pp. 161–182). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–41. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.863723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, K., & DeLamater, J. (2010). Deconstructing monogamy: Boundaries, identities, and fluidities across relationships. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding Non-Monogamies (pp. 9–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freiheit, S. R., Sonstegard, K., Schmitt, A., & Vye, C. (2006). Religiosity and spirituality: A psychometric evaluation of the Santa Clara strength of religious faith questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 55, 27–33. doi:10.1007/s11089-006-0029-y
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haupert, M., Gesselman, A., Moors, A., Fisher, H., & Garcia, J. (2017). Prevalence of experiences with consensual non-monogamous relationships: Findings from two nationally representative samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 43, 424–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, R. J. (1998). Swinging: A review of literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 507–521. doi:10.1023/A:1018708730945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, R. J. (2014). An on-line survey comparing swingers and polyamorists. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality 17, Retrieved from http://www.ejhs.org/volume17/swing.html
   Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Balzarini, R. N. (2016). Unweaving the rainbow of human sexuality: A review of one-night stands, serious romantic relationships, and the relationship space in between. In K. Aumer (Ed.), The psychology of love and hate in intimate relationships (pp. 13–28). New York City, NY: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, H. G., & Büssing, A. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A five-item measure for use in epidemological studies. Religions, 1, 78–85. doi:10.3390/rel1010078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuper, L. E., Nussbaum, R., & Mustanski, B. (2012). Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 244–254. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.596954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manley, M. H., Diamond, L. M., & van Anders, S. M. (2015). Polyamory, monogamy, and sexual fluidity: A longitudinal study of identity and sexual trajectories. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2, 168–180. doi:10.1037/sgd0000098
   Google Scholar
• McGee, R. W. (2016). Do Republicans have different views on homosexuality than Democrats? An empirical study of opinion in the United States. SSSN. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2799871
   Google Scholar
• Moore, P. (2016). Young Americans are less wedded to monogamy than their elders. Retrieved from https://today.yougov.com/news/2016/10/03/young-americans-less-wedded-monogamy/.
   Google Scholar
• Moors, A. C. (2016). Has the American public’s interest in information related to relationships beyond “the couple” increased over time? Journal of Sex Research, 54, 677–684. doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1178208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Schechinger, H. A. (2017). Unique and shared relationship benefits of consensually non-monogamous and monogamous relationships. European Psychologist, 22, 55–71. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., Rubin, J. D., & Conley, T. D. (2013). Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual nonmonogamy: Robust and worthy of additional research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13, 52–69. doi:10.1111/asap.2013.13.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musumeci, A. (2017, April 25). Couple wants to divorce each other to marry live-in girlfriend. New York Post. Retrieved from http://nypost.com/2017/04/25/couple-wants-to-divorce-each-other-to-marry-live-in-girlfriend/
   Google Scholar
• Noël, M. J. (2006). Progressive polyamory: Considering issues of diversity. Sexualities, 9, 602–620. doi:10.1177/1363460706070003
   Google Scholar
• Patefield, W. M. (1981). Algorithm AS 159: An efficient method of generating random r × c tables with given row and column totals. Applied Statistics, 30, 91–97. doi:10.2307/2346669
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, K. (1995). Telling sexual stories: Power, change and social worlds. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, A. (2010). Discursive constructions of polyamory in mono-normative media culture. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding Non-Monogamies (pp. 46–54). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, K. J. (1990). No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology, 1, 43–46. doi:10.1097/00001648-199001000-00010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin, J. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Conley, T. D. (2014). On the margins: Considering diversity among consensually non-monogamous relationships. Journal Für Psychologie, 22, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sheff, E. (2005). Polyamorous women, sexual subjectivity, and power. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34, 251–283. doi:10.1177/0891241604274263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheff, E., & Hammers, C. (2011). The privilege of perversities: Race, class and education among polyamorists and kinksters. Psychology & Sexuality, 2, 198–223. doi:10.1080/19419899.2010.537674
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. W., Marsden, P. V., Hout, M., & Kim, J. (1972–2012). General Social Surveys, 1972–2012 [Machine-readable data file]. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut [distributor].
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. C. (2011). Poly-tically incorrect: Women negotiating identity, status, and power in polyamorous relationships. ( Unpublished master’s thesis). San Diego State University, San Diego, CA. Retrieved from http://sdsu-dspace.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.10/1413/Wheeler_Sarah.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• World Heritage Encyclopedia. (2016). Terminology within polyamory. Retrieved from http://community.worldheritage.org/articles/Terminology_within_polyamory
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., Matsick, J. L., Moors, A. C., Rubin, J. D., & Conley, T. D. (2014). Does monogamy harm women? Deconstructing monogamy with a feminist lens. Journal Für Psychologie, 22, 1–18.
   Google Scholar