521
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Advancing E-contact to Reduce Intergroup Anxiety and Increase Positive Attitudes Towards Individuals Who Identify as Bisexual

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison Wesley.
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Hasler, B. S., & Shani-Sherman, T. (2015). Structured and unstructured intergroup contact in the digital age. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.022
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2006). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via the internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 825–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00037.x
  • Armstrong, H. L., & Reissing, E. D. (2014). Attitudes regarding casual sex, dating, and committed relationships with bisexual partners. Journal of Bisexuality, 14(2), 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2014.902784
  • Arndt, M., & de Bruin, K. (2011). Measurement of attitudes towards bisexual men and women among South African university students: The validation of an instrument. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(4), 497–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2011.555672
  • Bagci, S., Guvensoy, I., Turner, R. N., White, F. A., & Piyale, Z. E. (2021). Investigating the role of E-contact and self-disclosure on improving Turkish-Kurdish interethnic relations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(6), 577–593. http://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12760
  • Barlow, F. K., Paolini, S., Pedersen, A., Hornsey, M. J., Radke, H. R. M., Harwood, J., Rubin, M., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1629–1643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457953
  • Bartos, S. E., Berger, I., & Hegarty, P. (2014). Interventions to reduce sexual prejudice: A study-space analysis and meta-analytic review. Journal of Sex Research, 51(4), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.871625
  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. Yale University Press.
  • Boccanfuso, E., White, F. A., & Maunder, R. D. (2021). Reducing transgender stigma via an E-contact intervention. Sex Roles, 84(5–6), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01171-9
  • Brewster, M. E., & Moradi, B. (2010). Perceived experiences of anti-bisexual prejudice: Instrument development and evaluation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(4), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021116
  • Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 255–343). Academic Press.
  • Burke, S. E., Dovidio, J. F., LaFrance, M., Przedworski, J. M., Perry, S. P., Phelan, S. M., Burgess, D. J., Hardeman, R. R., Yeazel, M. W., & van Ryn, M. (2017). Beyond generalised sexual prejudice: Need for closure predicts negative attitudes toward bisexual people relative to gay/lesbian people. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.02.003
  • Burke, S. E., & LaFrance, M. (2018). Perceptions of instability and choice across sexual orientation groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216663019
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
  • de Bruin, K. D., & Arndt, M. (2010). Attitudes towards bisexual men and women in a university context: Relations with race, gender, knowing a bisexual man or woman and sexual orientation. Journal of Bisexuality, 10(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2010.500955
  • Dessel, A. B. (2010). Effects of intergroup dialogue: Public school teachers and sexual orientation prejudice. Small Group Research, 41(5), 556–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410369560
  • Dhont, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.022
  • Dodge, B., Herbenick, D., Friedman, M. R., Schick, V., Fu, T., Bostwick, W., Bartelt, E., Muños-Laboy, M., Pletta, D., Reece, M., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2016). Attitudes toward bisexual men and women among a nationally representative probability sample of adults in the United States. PLOS ONE, 11(10), e0164430. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164430
  • Dyar, C., & Feinstein, B. A. (2018). Binegativity: Attitudes toward and stereotypes about bisexual individuals. In D. J. Swan & S. Habibi (Eds.), Bisexuality: Theories, research, and recommendations for the invisible sexuality (pp. 95–111). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71535-3
  • Dyar, C., Lytle, A., London, B., & Levy, S. R. (2015). Application of bisexuality research to the development of a set of guidelines for intervention efforts to reduce binegativity. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(4), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000045
  • Eliason, M. J. (1997). The prevalence and nature of biphobia in heterosexual undergraduate students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(3), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024527032040
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behaviour Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  • Feinstein, B. A., & Dyar, C. (2017). Bisexuality, minority stress, and health. Current Sexual Health Reports, 9(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-017-0096-3
  • Feinstein, B. A., Dyar, C., Bhatia, V., Latack, J. A., & Davila, J. (2016). Conservative beliefs, attitudes toward bisexuality, and willingness to engage in romantic and sexual activities with a bisexual partner. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(6), 1535–1550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0642-x
  • Feinstein, B. A., Dyar, C., & Pachankis, J. E. (2019). A multilevel approach for reducing mental health and substance disparities affecting bisexual individuals. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 26(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2017.10.003
  • Friedman, M. R., Dodge, B., Schick, V., Herbenick, D., Huback, R. D., Bowling, J., Gonclaves, G., Krier, S., & Reece, M. (2014). From bias to bisexual health disparities: Attitudes towards bisexual men and women in the United States. LGBT Health, 1(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2014.0005
  • Garelick, A. S., Filip-Crawford, G., Varley, A. G., Nagoshi, C. T., Nagoshi, J. L., & Evans, R. (2017). Beyond the binary: Exploring the role of ambiguity in biphobia and transphobia. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2017.1319890
  • Gates, G. J. (2011). How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender? The Williams Institute. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/09h684x2
  • Gurven, M. D. (2018). Broadening horizons: Sample diversity and socioecological theory are essential to the future of psychological science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(45), 11420–11427. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720433115
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated meditation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
  • Helms, J. L., & Waters, A. M. (2016). Attitudes towards bisexual men and women. Journal of Bisexuality, 16(4), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2016.1242104
  • Henry, P. J. (2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19(2), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400802049936
  • Herek, G. M. (2002). Heterosexuals‘ attitudes towards bisexual men and women in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 39(4), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552150
  • Herek, G. M., & McLemore, K. A. (2013). Sexual prejudice. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143826
  • Hertlein, K. M., Hartwell, E. E., & Munns, M. E. (2016). Attitudes toward bisexuality according to sexual orientation and gender. Journal of Bisexuality, 16(3), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2016.1200510
  • Hodson, G. (2008). Interracial prison contact: The pros for (socially dominant) cons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X231109
  • Hodson, G. (2011). Do ideologically intolerant people benefit from intergroup contact? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411409025
  • Hodson, G., & Dhont, K. (2015). The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018
  • Hodson, G., & Hewstone, M. (Ed.). (2013). Advances in intergroup contact. Psychology Press.
  • Hoffarth, M. R., & Hodson, G. (2020). Coming out, intergroup relations, and attitudes towards LGBT rights. In D. Haider-Markel (Ed.), Oxford encyclopedia of LGBT politics and policy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1179
  • Hubbard, K., & de Visser, R. O. (2015). Not just bi the bi: The relationship between essentialist beliefs and attitudes about bisexuality. Psychology & Sexuality, 6(3), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2014.987682
  • Huffaker, L., & Kwon, P. (2016). A comprehensive approach to sexual and transgender prejudice. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 28(3), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2016.1191405
  • Kite, M. E., Togans, C. J., & Schultz, T. J. (2019). Stability or change? A cross-cultural look at attitudes towards sexual and gender identity minorities. In K. D. Keith (Ed.), Cross-cultural psychology: Contemporary themes and perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 427–448). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119519348.ch20
  • Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296224002
  • Kteily, N. S., Hodson, G., Dhont, K., & Ho, A. K. (2019). Predisposed to prejudice but responsive to intergroup contact? Testing the unique benefits of intergroup contact across different types of individual differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/136843021771650
  • Kwon, P., & Hugelshofer, D. S. (2012). Lesbian, gay and bisexual speaker panels lead to attitude change among heterosexual college students. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 24(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2012.643285
  • la Roi, C., Meyer, I. H., & Frost, D. M. (2019). Differences in sexual identity dimensions between bisexual and other sexual minority individuals: Implications for minority stress and mental health. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 89(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000369
  • Larsen, R. B. (2019). Controlling social desirability bias. International Journal of Market Research, 6(5), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318805305
  • Louderback, L. A., & Whitley, B. E. (1997). Perceived erotic value of homosexuality and sex‐role attitudes as mediators of sex differences in heterosexual college students’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Sex Research, 34(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499709551882
  • Lytle, A., Dyar, C., Levy, S. R., & London, B. (2017). Contact with bisexual individuals reduces binegativity among heterosexuals and lesbian women and gay men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(5), 580–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2241
  • MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2015). The development of online cross-group relations among university students: Benefits of earlier (vs. later) disclosure of stigmatized group membership. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(6), 788–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514548394
  • Matsuda, W. T., Rouse, S. V., & Miller-Perrin, C. L. (2014). Validation of the Attitudes Regarding Bisexuality Scale: Correlations with ratings of a positive media image of bisexual men and women. Journal of Bisexuality, 14(2), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2014.903219
  • Maunder, R. D., Day, S., & White, F. A. (2020). How beneficial is contact for prejudice-prone individuals? The type of stigmatized outgroup matters. Journal of Social Psychology, 160(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1601608
  • Maunder, R. D., White, F. A., & Verrelli, S. (2019). Modern avenues for intergroup contact: Using E-contact and intergroup emotions to reduce stigma and social distancing against people with schizophrenia. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(7), 947–963. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218794873
  • Mereish, E. H., Katz-Wise, S. L., & Woulfe, J. (2017). Bisexual-specific minority stressors, psychological distress, and suicidality in bisexual individuals: The mediating role of loneliness. Prevention Science, 18(6), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0804-2
  • Miller, R. K., O’Neill, D., Bhuyan, D. J., & Martin, F. H. (2021). Sex differences in the attitudes of Australian and Indian heterosexual individuals towards gay men, lesbians, bisexual men and bisexual women. Journal of Bisexuality, 21(3), 332–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2021.1992328
  • Mohr, J. J., & Rochlen, A. B. (1999). Measuring attitudes regarding bisexuality in lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(3), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.46.3.353
  • Morin, S. F. (1974). Educational programs as a means of changing attitudes toward gay people. Homosexual Counseling Journal, 1(4), 160–165.
  • Morrison, T. G., Harrington, R., & McDermott, D. T. (2010). Bi now, gay later: Implicit and explicit binegativity among Irish university students. Journal of Bisexuality, 10(3), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2010.500952
  • Mulick, P. S., & Wright, L. W. (2002). Examining the existence of biphobia in the heterosexual and homosexual populations. Journal of Bisexuality, 2(4), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J159v02n04_03
  • Mulick, P. S., & Wright, L. W. (2011). The Biphobia Scale a decade later: Reflections and additions. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(4), 453–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2011.620486
  • Nielsen, M., Haun, D., Kartner, J., & Legare, C. H. (2017). The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 31–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.017
  • Ochs, R. (1996). Biphobia: It goes more than two ways. In B. A. Firestein (Ed.), Bisexuality: The psychology and politics of an invisible minority (pp. 217–239). SAGE Publications.
  • Ochs, R., & Deihl, M. (1992). Moving beyond binary thinking. In W. J. Blumenfeld (Ed.), Homophobia: How we all pay the price (pp. 67–75). Beacon Press.
  • Perales, F. (2019). The health and wellbeing of Australian lesbian, gay and bisexual people: A systematic assessment using a longitudinal national sample. Mental Health and Wellbeing, 43(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12855
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. Psychology Press.
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
  • Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 161–198). Wiley.
  • Sarno, E. L., Newcomb, M. E., Feinstein, B. A., & Mustanski, B. (2020). Bisexual men’s experiences with discrimination, internalised binegativity, and identity affirmation: Differences by partner gender. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(5), 1783–1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01712-z
  • Smith, S. J., Axelton, A. M., & Saucier, D. A. (2009). The effects of contact on sexual prejudice: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 61(3–4), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9627-3
  • Steffens, M. C., & Wagner, C. (2004). Attitudes towards lesbians, gay men, bisexual women, and bisexual men in Germany. Journal of Sex Research, 41(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552222
  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x
  • Taylor, J. (2018). Bisexual mental health: A call to action. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 39(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2017.1391904
  • Taylor, J., Power, J., Smith, E., & Rathbone, M. (2019). Bisexual mental health. Australian Journal of General Practice, 48(3), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-06-18-4615
  • Toews, J. B. (2020). The effect of imagined intergroup contact and need for closure on attitudes toward bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 20(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2020.1732257
  • White, F. A., & Abu-Rayya, H. M. (2012). A dual identity-electronic contact (DIEC) experiment promoting short- and long-term intergroup harmony. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.007
  • White, F. A., Abu-Rayya, H. M., & Weitzel, C. (2014). Achieving twelve-months of intergroup bias reduction: The dual identity-electronic contact (DIEC) experiment. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijntrel.2013.08.002
  • White, F. A., Borinca, I., Vezzali, L., Reynolds, K. J., Blomster Lyshol, J. K., Verrelli, S., & Falomir-Pichastor, J. M. (2021). Beyond direct contact: The theoretical and societal relevance of indirect contact for improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 77(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12400
  • White, F. A., Maunder, R. D., & Verrelli, A. (2020). Text-based E-contact: Harnessing cooperative internet interactions to bridge the social and psychological divide. European Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 76–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1753459
  • White, F. A., Turner, R. N., Verrelli, S., Harvey, L. J., & Hanna, J. R. (2019). Improving intergroup relations between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland via E-Contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2515
  • White, F. A., Verrelli, S., Maunder, R. D., & Kervinen, A. (2019). Using electronic contact to reduce homonegative attitudes, emotions, and behavioral intentions among heterosexual women and men: A contemporary extension of the contact hypothesis. Journal of Sex Research, 56(9), 1179–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1491943
  • Whitley, B. E. (2001). Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles, 45(11–12), 691–721. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015640318045
  • Yoshino, K. (2000). The epistemic contract of bisexual erasure. Stanford Law Review, 52(2), 353–462. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229482
  • Yost, M. R., & Thomas, G. D. (2012). Gender and binegativity: Men’s and women’s attitudes toward male and female bisexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(3), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9767-8
  • Zivony, A., & Lobel, T. (2014). The invisible stereotypes of bisexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(6), 1165–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0263-9

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.