190
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Test of Three Different Explanations for Low Stimulus Response Discrimination in Phallometric Testing

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &

References

  • Abel, G. G., Barlow, D. H., Blanchard, E. B., & Mavissakalian, M. (1975). Measurement of sexual arousal in male homosexuals: Effects of instructions and stimulus modality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 4(6), 623–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544270
  • Abel, G. G., Blanchard, E. B., & Barlow, D. H. (1981). Measurement of sexual arousal in several paraphilias: The effects of stimulus modality, instructional set and stimulus content on the objective. Behavior Research and Therapy, 19(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(81)90109-1
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).Author.
  • Bailey, J. M., Hsu, K. J., & Bernhard, P. A. (2016). An internet study of men sexually attracted to children: Sexual attraction patterns. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(7), 976–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000212
  • Bailey, J. M., Blanchard, R., Hsu, K. J., & Revelle, W. (2020). A map of desire: Multidimensional scaling of men’s sexual interest in male and female children and adolescents. Psychological Medicine, 15(5), 2714–2720. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001476
  • Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (1989). Erectile response among heterosexual child molesters, father-daughter incest offenders, and matched non-offenders: Five distinct age preference profiles. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 21(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079791
  • Barbaree, H. E., Blanchard, R., & Langton, C. M. (2003). The development of sexual aggression through the life span: The effect of age on sexual arousal and recidivism among sex offenders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07293.x
  • Beier, K. M., Amelung, T., Kuhle, L., Grundmann, D., Scerner, G., & Neutze, J. (2015). Hebephilia as a sexual disorder. Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie, 81(3), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1330539
  • Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 13(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.1.118
  • Blanchard, R., & Barbaree, H. E. (2005). The strength of sexual arousal as a function of the age of the sex offender: Comparisons among pedophiles, hebephiles, and teleiophiles. Sexual Abuse, 17(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320501700407
  • Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P., & Dickey, R. (2006). Phallometric comparison of pedophilic interest in nonadmitting sexual offenders against stepdaughters, biological daughters, other biologically related girls, and unrelated girls. Sexual Abuse, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320601800101
  • Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., … Klassen, P. E. (2009a). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9
  • Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., & Dickey, R. (2009b). Absolute versus relative ascertainment of pedophilia in men. Sexual Abuse, 21(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063209347906
  • Blanchard, R. (2011). Misdiagnoses of pedohebephilia using victim count: A reply to Wollert and Cramer. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(6), 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9835-0
  • Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., & Cantor, J. M. (2012). Sexual attraction to others: A comparison of two models of alloerotic responding in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9675-3
  • Cantor, J. M., & McPhail, I. V. (2015). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for hebephilia. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(9), 1940–1950. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12970
  • Card, R. D., & Farrall, W. (1988). Detecting faked penile responses to erotic stimuli: A comparison of stimulus conditions and response measures. Annals of Sex Research, 3(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00850441
  • Chivers, M. L. (2017). The specificity of women’s sexual response and its relationship with sexual orientations: A review and ten hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0897-x
  • Dawson, S. J., Bannerman, B. A., & Lalumière, M. L. (2016). Paraphilic interests: An examination of sex differences in a nonclinical sample. Sexual Abuse, 28(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214525645
  • Ebsworth, M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Viewing time as a measure of bisexual sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9923-9
  • Fairweather, A., Kingston, D. A., & Lalumière, M. L. (2016). Nudity as a disinhibiting cue in a date rape analogue. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(4), 821–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0633-y
  • Freund, K., Diamant, J., & Pinkava, V. (1958). On the validity and reliability of the phalloplethysmographic diagnosis of some sexual deviations. Review of Czechoslovak Medicine, 4(2), 145–151.
  • Freund, K. (1965). Diagnosing heterosexual pedophilia by means of a test for sexual interest. Behavior Research and Therapy, 3(4), 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0057967(65)90031-8
  • Freund, K., Watson, R., & Rienzo, D. (1988). Signs of feigning in the phallometric test. Behavior Research and Therapy, 26(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(88)90109-X
  • Freund, K. (1991). Reflections on the development of the phallometric method of assessing erotic preferences. Annals of Sex Research, 4(3–4), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00850054
  • Hall, G. C. (1991). Sexual arousal as a function of physiological and cognitive variables in a sexual offender population. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20(4), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542616
  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
  • Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V., ll, Chaplin, T. C., & Earls, C. (1992). Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment data. Psychological Assessment, 4(4), 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.4.502
  • Howes, R. J. (1995). A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America. Sexual Abuse, 7(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329500700104
  • Howes, R. J., & Howes, S. (2017). Sexual arousal as a function of stimulus mode: Implications for phallometric assessment. Journal of Forensic Research, 8(6), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7145.1000398
  • Joyal, C. C., & Carpentier, J. (2021). Concordance and discordance between paraphilic interests and behaviors: A follow-up study. The Journal of Sex Research, 59(22), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1986801
  • Kaemingk, K. L., Koselka, M., Becker, J. V., & Kaplan, M. S. (1995). Age and adolescent sexual offender arousal. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 7(4), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329500700402
  • Kafka, M. P. (1997). Hypersexual desire in males: An operational definition and clinical implications for males with paraphilias and paraphilia-related disorders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(5), 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024507922470
  • Kuban, M., Barbaree, H. E., & Blanchard, R. (1999). A comparison of volume and circumference phallometry: Response magnitude and method agreement. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28(4), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018700813140
  • Lalumiére, M. L., & Harris, G. T. (1998). Common questions regarding the use of phallometric testing with sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 10(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329801000306
  • Lalumière, M. L., & Earls, C. M. (1992). Voluntary control of penile responses as a function of stimulus duration and instructions. Behavioral Assessment, 14(2), 121–132.
  • Långström, N., & Hanson, R. K. (2006). High rates of sexual behavior in the general population: Correlates and predictors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-8993-y
  • Levaque, E., Dawson, S., Wan, C., & Lalumiére, M. L. (2021). Sex drive as a possible mediator of the gender difference in the prevalence of paraphilic interests in a nonclinical sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51, 867–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02074-w
  • Looman, J., Abracen, J., Maillet, G., & DiFazio, R. (1998). Phallometric nonresponding in offenders. Sexual Abuse, 10(4), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329801000406
  • Lykins, A. D., Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Dickey, R., Klassen, P. E., … Blanchard, R. (2010). The relation between peak response magnitudes and agreement in diagnoses obtained from two different phallometric tests for pedophilia. Sexual Abuse, 22(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063209352094
  • Lykins, A. D., Robinson, J. L., Serge, S., & Cantor, J. M. (2015). The effects of common medications on volumetric phallometry. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(3), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2014.900121
  • Malcolm, P. B., Andrews, D. A., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Discriminant and predictive validity of phallometrically measured sexual age and gender preference. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8(4), 486–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626093008004004
  • Martijn, F., Babchishin, K. M., Pullman, L. E., & Seto, M. C. (2020). Sexual attraction and falling in love in persons with pedohebephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(4), 1305–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01579-9
  • McPhail, I. V., Hermann, C. A., Fernane, S., Fernandez, Y. M., Nunes, K. L., & Cantor, J. M. (2019). Validity in phallometric testing for sexual interests in children: A meta-analytic review. Assessment, 26(3), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117706139
  • Michaud, P., & Proulx, J. P. (2009). Penile-response profiles of sexual aggressors during phallometric testing. Sexual Abuse, 21(3), 308–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063209342073
  • Muise, A., Milhausen, R. R., Cole, S. L., & Graham, C. (2013). Sexual compulsivity in heterosexual married adults: The role of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition in individuals not considered “high-risk. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 20(3), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2013.786661
  • Quinsey, V. L., & Bergersen, S. G. (1976). Instructional control of penile circumference in assessments of sexual preference. Behavior Therapy, 7(4), 489–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(76)80168-2
  • Rosenthal, A. M., Sylva, D., Safron, A., & Bailey, J. M. (2012). The male bisexuality debate revisited: Some bisexual men have bisexual arousal patterns. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9881-7
  • Seto, M. C., Cantor, J. M., & Blanchard, R. (2006). Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(3), 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.3.610
  • Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., Harris, G. T., & Chivers, M. L. (2012). The sexual response of sexual sadists. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(3), 739–753. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028714
  • Seto, M. C., Stephens, S., Lalumière, M. L., & Cantor, J. M. (2017). The revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2): Development and criterion-related validation. Sexual Abuse, 29(7), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215612444
  • Seto, M. C., Curry, S., Dawson, S. J., Bradford, J. M. W., & Chiver, M. L. (2021). Concordance of paraphilic interests and behaviors. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(4), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1830018
  • Singer, B. (1984). Conceptualizing sexual arousal and attraction. The Journal of Sex Research, 20(3), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498409551222
  • Stephens, S., Seto, M. C., Goodwill, A. M., & Cantor, J. M. (2017a). Evidence of construct validity in the assessment of hebephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(1), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0907-z
  • Stephens, S., Leroux, E., Skilling, T., Cantor, J. M., & Seto, M. C. (2017b). Taxometric analyses of pedophilia utilizing self-report, behavioral, and sexual arousal indicators. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(8), 1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000291
  • Stephens, S., Seto, M. C., Goodwill, A. M., & Cantor, J. M. (2018). Age diversity among victims of hebephilic sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 30(3), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063216665837
  • Stephens, S., Seto, M. C., Cantor, J. M. L., & alumière, M. L. (2019). The screening Scale for Pedophilic Interest-Revised (SSPI-2) may be a measure of pedohebephilia. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 16(10), 1655–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.015
  • Stephens, S., Klein, L., & Seto, M. C. (2021). Differences in sexual interest in children between men who commit undetected versus detected sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse, 33(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219889056
  • Stephens, S., & McPhail, I. V. (2021). A preliminary examination of sexual interest in children in a non-representative community sample of females. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 47(6), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2021.1928804
  • Toates, F. (2009). An integrative theoretical framework for understanding sexual motivation, arousal, and behavior. The Journal of Sex Research, 46(2–3), 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022449092747768
  • Walton, M. T., Cantor, J. M., Bhullar, N., & Lykins, A. D. (2017). Hypersexuality: A critical review and introduction to the “sexhavior cycle.” Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(8), 2231–2251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-0991-8
  • Winters, J., Christoff, K., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2009). Conscious regulation of sexual arousal in men. The Journal of Sex Research, 46(4), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902754103

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.