Is the Anthropomorphization of Sex Dolls Associated with Objectification and Hostility Toward Women? A Mixed Method Study among Doll Users

References

• Altman, D. G. (1990). Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, N., Ho-Foster, A., Mitchell, S., Scheepers, E., & Goldstein, S. (2007). Risk factors for domestic physical violence: National cross-sectional household surveys in eight Southern African countries. BMC Women’s Health, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-68747-11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Awasthi, B. (2017). From attire to assault: Clothing, objectification, and de-humanization – A possible prelude to sexual violence? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bareket, O., Kahalon, R., Shnabel, N., & Glick, P. (2018). The madonna-whore dichotomy: Men who perceive women’s nurturance and sexuality as mutually exclusive endorse patriarchy and show lower relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 79(9–10), 519–532. doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0895-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power→ sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 768–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, K. R., O’Dean, S. M., Lian, J., & Denson, T. F. (2021). Misogynistic tweets correlate with violence against women. Psychological Science, 32(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620968529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, G. (2020, August 11). COVID-19 lockdowns have led to a huge spike in sex doll sales. Vice. https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kpmpb/covid-19-lockdowns-have-led-to-a-huge-spike-in-sex-doll-sales
   Google Scholar
• Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2), 249–254. doi:10.48550/arXiv.cmp-lg/9602004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, V. (2016). For the love of doll (s): A patriarchal nightmare of cyborg couplings. ESC: English Studies in Canada, 42(1), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1353/esc.2016.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Check, J. V. P. (1984). The Hostility Towards Women Scale [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Manitoba. http://hdl.handle.net/1993/23279
   Google Scholar
• Curran, P. (2004). Development of a new measure of men's objectification of women: Factor structure test retest validity. Retrieved from psychology honors projects, digital commons @ Illinois Wesleyan university, 13, http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/psych_honproj/13
   Google Scholar
• DeKeseredy, W. S., Rogness, M., & Schwartz, M. D. (2004). Separation/divorce sexual assault: The current state of social scientific knowledge. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(6), 675–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, K. (2015, September 17). In defence of sex machines: Why trying to ban sex robots is wrong. The conversation. https://theconversation.com/in-defence-of-sex-machines-why-trying-to-ban-sex-robots-is-wrong-47641
   Google Scholar
• Döring, N., Mohseni, M. R., & Walter, R. (2020). Design, use, and effects of sex dolls and sex robots: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(7), e18551. https://doi.org/10.2196/18551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, N. (2020). Sexpuppen und Sexroboter aus psychologischer und therapeutischer Perspektive: Pathogene und salutogene Nutzungsmuster. In O. Bendel (Ed.), Maschinenliebe (pp. 283–301). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29864-7_16
   Google Scholar
• Döring, N. (2021). Sex dolls and sex robots. In A. D. Lykins (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sexuality and Gender (pp. 1–7). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59531-3_63-1
   Google Scholar
• Eher, R., Rettenberger, M., & Schilling, F. (2010). Psychiatric diagnosis in sexual offenders: An empirical investigation of 807 imprisoned child molesters and rapists. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschuung, 23(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1247274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairchild, A. J., & McDaniel, H. L. (2017). Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: Mediation analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 105(6), 1259–1271. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.117.152546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, T., Fernandez, M., Novotny, J., & Alani, H. (2019, June). Exploring misogyny across the manosphere in Reddit. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science (pp. 87–96).
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. (2010). The sex doll: A history. McFarland & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., & White, K. B. (2004). First- and second-generation measures of sexism, rape myths and related beliefs, and hostility toward women: Their interrelationships and association with college students’ experiences with dating aggression and sexual coercion. Violence Against Women, 10(3), 236–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801203256002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosch-Villaronga, E., & Poulsen, A. (2020). Sex care robots. Exploring the potential use of sexual robot technologies for disabled and elder care. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2020-0001
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, S. J., Bernard, P., Klein, O., & Allen, J. (2013). Toward a unified theory of objectification and dehumanization. In S. J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectification and (de) Humanization (pp. 1–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_1
   Google Scholar
• Grand View Research. (2021, January). Sex toys market size, share & trends analysis report by type (male, female), by distribution channel (e-commerce, specialty stores, mass merchandizers), by region, and segment forecasts, 2021 - 2028. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/sex-toys-market
   Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., & Lievesley, R. (2020). Sex doll ownership: An agenda for research. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01177-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., Lievesley, R., & Wanless, K. (2021). Exploring the psychological characteristics and risk-related cognitions of individuals who own sex dolls. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fxznv
   Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., Lievesley, R., & Wanless, K. (2022). Exploring the psychological characteristics of individuals who own sex dolls. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–16. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2031848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., Kashima, Y., & Bain, P. (2008). Attributing and denying humanness to others. European Review of Social Psychology, 19(1), 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280801981645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2021). The PROCESS macro for SPSS and SAS. version 3.0.
   Google Scholar
• Heflick, N. A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2014). Seeing eye to body: The literal objectification of women. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 225–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijnen, S., De Kleijn, R., & Hommel, B. (2019). The impact of human–robot synchronization on anthropomorphization. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2607. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, W. E. J., & Lin, V. W. (2018). “Sex robots“ revisited: A reply to the campaign against sex robots. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 47(4), 107–121. doi:10.1145/3243141.3243153
   Google Scholar
• Knafo, D. (2015). Guys and dolls: Relational life in the technological era. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 25(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2015.1055174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langcaster-James, M., & Bentley, G. (2018). Beyond the sex doll: Post-human companionship and the rise of the ‘Allodoll.’ Robotics, 7(4), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics7040062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone, R. M., & Parrott, D. J. (2019). Misogynistic peers, masculinity, and bystander intervention for sexual aggression: Is it really just “locker-room talk? Aggressive Behavior, 45(1), 42–51. doi:10.1002/ab.21795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi, B. (2013). Discrimination, objectification, and dehumanization: Toward a pantheoretical framework. In S. J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectification and (de) humanization (pp. 153–181). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Sex and social justice. In M. C. Nussbaum (Ed.), Objectification (pp. 213–239). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peschka, L. (2021). A think like a human? A mixed-methods study on sexdolls and their users. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Otto-Friedrich University of Bamberg.
   Google Scholar
• Polaschek, D. L., & Ward, T. (2002). The implicit theories of potential rapists: What our questionnaires tell us. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(4), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00063-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, K. (2016a). The asymmetrical ‘relationship’ parallels between prostitution and the development of sex robots. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society, 45(3), 290–293. https://doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874281
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, K. (2016b). Sex robot matters: Slavery, the prostituted, and the rights of machines. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 35(2), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2016.2554421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2012). Of animals and objects: Men’s implicit dehumanization of women and likelihood of sexual aggression. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(6), 734–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212436401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, T. D., & King, A. R. (2016). Anxious, hostile, and sadistic: Maternal attachment and everyday sadism predict hostile masculine beliefs and male sexual violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem, M., Eyssel, F., Rohlfing, K., Kopp, S., & Joublin, F. (2013). To err is human(-like): Effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likability. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0196-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmen, A., & Dhont, K. (2021). Hostile and benevolent sexism: The differential roles of human supremacy beliefs, women’s connection to nature, and the dehumanization of women. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(7), 1053–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220920713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samji, K., & Vasquez, E. A. (2020). The link between myths about sexual aggression and sexual objectification via hostile attitudes toward women. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 26(3), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2019.1676924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, E. E., & Smid, W. J. (2020). Exploring hostility toward women in high-risk rapists: The relevance of ambivalence and relational experience. Sexual Abuse, 33(7), 747–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063220946039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. D., & Pitts, V. L. (1995). Exploring a feminist routine activities approach to explaining sexual assault. Justice Quarterly, 12(1), 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E. (2011). Commentary: Mediation analysis, causal process, and cross-sectional data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(5), 852–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.606718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverdolls, (2021, September 16). https://www.thesilverdoll.com/product/dollhouse168-evo-170cm-life-size-realistic-sex-doll/
   Google Scholar
• Stemler, S. (2000). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(17). doi:10.7275/z6fm-2e34
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski, D. M., Carr, E. R., & Moffitt, L. B. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Clinical implications and training considerations. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozdan, S., & Briken, P. (2019). Age of onset and its correlates in men with sexual interest in children. Sexual Medicine, 7(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2018.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO Report. (2019). I’d blush if I could: Closing gender divides in digital skills through education. Retrieved January 4, 2022, fromhttps://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367416.page=1
   Google Scholar
• Vaes, J., Loughnan, S., & Puvia, E. (2013). The inhuman body: When sexual objectification becomes dehumanizing. In J. Vaes, S. Loughnan, & E. Puvia (Eds.), Humanness and dehumanization (pp. 194–212). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, S. H. (2012). The modern sex-doll owner: A descriptive analysis. [ Unpublished master’s thesis]. California Polytechnic State University.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21–54. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollast, R., Puvia, E., Bernard, P., Tevichapong, P., & Klein, O. (2018). How sexual objectification generates dehumanization in Western and Eastern cultures: A comparison between Belgium and Thailand. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 77(2), 69–82. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoman, I., & Mars, M. (2012). Robots, men and sex tourism. Futures, 44(4), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C. (2020, July 23). China’s sex toy makers in growth spurt, as coronavirus lockdowns fuel global appetite. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3094355/chinas-sex-toy-makers-growth-spurt-coronavirus-lockdowns-fuel
   Google Scholar
• Zlotowski, J. (2015). Understanding anthropomorphism in the interaction between users and robots. [Doctoral thesis, University of Canterbury].
   Google Scholar