The Role of Sexual and Romantic Attraction in Human Mate Preferences

References

• Adkins-Regan, E. (1998). Hormonal mechanisms of mate choice. American Zoologist, 38(1), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/38.1.166
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, B. M., Skinner, D. C., & Roselli, C. E. (2011). Wired on steroids: Sexual differentiation of the brain and its role in the expression of sexual partner preferences. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2(Oct), 42. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENDO.2011.00042/BIBTEX
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Surbey, M. K. (2014). I want what she’s having. Human Nature, 25(3), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12110-014-9202-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonsen, A. N., Zdaniuk, B., Yule, M., & Brotto, L. A. (2020). Ace and aro: Understanding differences in romantic attractions among persons identifying as asexual. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(5), 1615–1630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01600-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, J. (2019). The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences. Biological Reviews, 94(4), 1381–1415. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balthazart, J. (2011). Minireview: Hormones and human sexual orientation. Endocrinology, 152(8), 2937–2947. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2011-0277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balthazart, J. (2016). Sex differences in partner preferences in humans and animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1688), 20150118. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, P., & Laland, K. N. (2013). Tinbergen’s four questions: An appreciation and an update. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28(12), 712–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bech-Sørensen, J., & Pollet, T. V. (2016). Sex differences in mate preferences: A replication study, 20 years later. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(3), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0048-6
   Google Scholar
• Bereczkei, T., Gyuris, P., & Weisfeld, G. E. (2004). Sexual imprinting in human mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271(1544), 1129–1134. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bien, N., ten Oever, S., Goebel, R., & Sack, A. T. (2012). The sound of size. NeuroImage, 59(1), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, A., & Kushnick, G. (2021). Proximate and ultimate perspectives on romantic love. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1088. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2021.573123/BIBTEX
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaert, A. F., & Skorska, M. N. (2020). A short review of biological research on the development of sexual orientation. Hormones and Behavior, 119, 104659. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YHBEH.2019.104659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, L. G., & Vukovic, J. (2019). Mate preferences across the lifespan. The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Behavioral Endocrinology, 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190649739.013.8
   Google Scholar
• Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotto, L. A., Knudson, G., Inskip, J., Rhodes, K., & Erskine, Y. (2010). Asexuality: A mixed-methods approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 599–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9434-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotto, L. A., & Yule, M. (2016). Asexuality: Sexual orientation, paraphilia, sexual dysfunction, or none of the above? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(3), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10508-016-0802-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (2006). Strategies of human mating. Psychological Topics, 15(2), 239–260. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/14203
   Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., Bruchon-Schweitzer, M., Ch’U, H.-Y., Czapinski, J., Deraad, B., Ekehammar, B., El Lohamy, N., Fioravanti, M., Georgas, J., Gjerde, P., Guttman, R., Hazan, F., Iwawaki, S., Janakiramaiah, N., & Yang, K.-S. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(1), 5–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022190211001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2011). Evolutionary psychology and feminism. Sex Roles, 64(9), 768–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9987-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challacombe, D. J., & Perdomo, N. (2021). Attraction preferences of men who have sex with men. Sexuality and Culture, 25(6), 2010–2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09861-6
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. T. (1947). Student views on mate selection. Marriage and Family Living, 9(4), 85. https://doi.org/10.2307/347505
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). How sexually dimorphic are human mate preferences? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1082–1093. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215590987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csajbók, Z., & Berkics, M. (2017). Factor, factor, on the whole, who’s the best fitting of all?: Factors of mate preferences in a large sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110(1), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.110.1.173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. M. (2004). Emerging perspectives on distinctions between romantic love and sexual desire. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(3), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. M. (2016). Sexual fluidity in male and females. Current Sexual Health Reports, 8(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-016-0092-z
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., & Hunt, L. L. (2013). The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 623–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlund, J. E., Clark, D. Q., Kalmus, A. M., & Sausville, A. (2021). Receptivity to casual sexual requests. Journal of Social Psychology, 161(6), 779–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.1881030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, T. W., & Bleay, C. (2009). Previous experiences shape adaptive mate preferences. Behavioral Ecology, 20(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, H. E. (1998). Lust, attraction, and attachment in mammalian reproduction. Human Nature, 9(1), 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-998-1010-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Romantic love: An fMRI study of a neural mechanism for mate choice. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/CNE.20772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2006). Romantic love: A mammalian brain system for mate choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361(1476), 2173–2186. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTB.2006.1938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., Mashek, D., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2002). Defining the brain systems of lust, romantic attraction, and attachment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31(5), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019888024255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614561683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2008). Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (2009). Sex differences in mate selection preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2009.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17(2), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1702_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1205–1259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobrogge, K. L., Perkins, P. S., Baker, J. H., Balcer, K. D., Breedlove, S. M., & Klump, K. L. (2007). Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: Sexual selection theory revisited. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(5), 717–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9216-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenkamp, A., Kümmerling, A., & Hassebrauck, M. (2005). Blinder Mann sucht schöne Frau? Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 36(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.36.2.77
   Google Scholar
• Havlíček, J., & Roberts, S. C. (2009). MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havlíček, J., Třebický, V., Valentova, J. V., Kleisner, K., Akoko, R. M., Fialová, J., Jash, R., Kočnar, T., Pereira, K. J., Štěrbová, Z., Varella, M. A. C., Vokurková, J., Vunan, E., & Roberts, S. C. (2017). Men’s preferences for women’s breast size and shape in four cultures. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37(554), 269.
   Google Scholar
• Hopcroft, R. L. (2021). High income men have high value as long-term mates in the U.S.: Personal income and the probability of marriage, divorce, and childbearing in the U.S. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(5), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, J. W., & Henze, L. F. (2006). Campus values in mate selection: A replication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31(4), 772. https://doi.org/10.2307/349321
   Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Webster, G. D., & Gesselman, A. N. (2013). The structure and content of long-term and short-term mate preferences. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 7(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.5964/IJPR.V7I2.125
   Google Scholar
• Kassambara, A. (2020). Ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ based publication ready plots. R package version 0.2. 153. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr
   Google Scholar
• Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Bryan, A., Barr, A., & Brown, S. (1995). Age preferences and mate choice among homosexuals and heterosexuals: A case for modular psychological mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, J. F., James, C., Jannson, A. U. C., Koyama, N. F., & Hill, R. A. (2014). A comparison of heterosexual and homosexual mating preferences in personal advertisements. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(5), 408–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. (2020). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. ( 1.5.3). CRAN.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. M., Conroy-Beam, D., Al-Shawaf, L., Raja, A., DeKay, T., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Friends with benefits: The evolved psychology of same-and opposite-sex friendship. Evolutionary Psychology, 9(4), 147470491100900407. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491100900407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N. P. (2007). Mate preference necessities in long- and short-term mating: People prioritize in themselves what their mates prioritize in them. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(3), 528–535. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/723/
   Google Scholar
• Lippa, R. A. (2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: An examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10508-006-9151-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, A. C., Caldwell, C. A., Jones, B. C., & Debruine, L. M. (2011). Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(6), 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9806-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & Debruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2003). Investigating an imprinting-like phenomenon in humans partners and opposite-sex parents have similar hair and eye colour. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00119-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, M., Koff, E., Grossmith, S., & Migliorini, R. (2011). Sexual orientation and shifts in preferences for a partner’s body attributes in short-term versus long-term mating contexts. Psychological Reports, 108(3), 699–710. https://doi.org/10.2466/07.PR0.108.3.699-710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D. (2017). sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science. R Package Version 2.4.0.
   Google Scholar
• Marcinkowska, U. M., & Rantala, M. J. (2012). Sexual imprinting on facial traits of opposite-sex parents in humans. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(3), 147470491201000. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, A. L., McNulty, J. K., Jackson, G. L., & Karney, B. R. (2014). Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(3), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P. C. D., & Schielzeth, H. (2017). The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 14(134), 20170213. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neto, F., Da Conceição Pinto, M., & Furnham, A. (2012). Sex and culture similarities and differences in long-term partner preferences. Journal of Relationships Research, 3, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2012.4
   Google Scholar
• Pek, J., & Flora, D. B. (2018). Reporting effect sizes in original psychological research: A discussion and tutorial. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petterson, L. J., Dixson, B. J., Little, A. C., & Vasey, P. L. (2018). Viewing time and self-report measures of sexual attraction in Samoan cisgender and transgender androphilic males. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(8), 2427–2434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1267-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaus, J. G., Kippin, T. E., Coria-Avila, G. A., Gelez, H., Afonso, V. M., Ismail, N., & Parada, M. (2012). Who, what, where, when (and maybe even why)? How the experience of sexual reward connects sexual desire, preference, and performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9935-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybylo, E. (2019). Asexual erotics: Intimate readings of compulsory sexuality. The Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Gate, R., Sprecher, S., & Christopher, F. S. (2000). Partner preferences: What characteristics do men and women desire in their short-term sexual and long-term romantic partners? Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 12(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v12n03_01
   Google Scholar
• Scheller, M., Matorres, F., Little, A. C., Tompkins, L., & de Sousa, A. A. (2021). The role of vision in the emergence of mate preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01901-w
   Google Scholar
• Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., Econie, A., & Treger, S. (2019). Mate preferences in emerging adulthood and beyond: Age variations in mate preferences and beliefs about change in mate preferences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(10), 3139–3158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518816880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004386
   Google Scholar
• Tennov, D. (1998). Love and limerence: The experience of being in love. Scarborough House.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 20(4), 410–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x
   Google Scholar
• Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B., & Lenton, A. P. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(38), 15011–15016. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705290104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro-Morn, M., & Sprecher, S. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of mate preferences among university students: The United States vs. The People’s Republic of China (PRC). Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 34(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.34.2.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., Meltzer, A. L., & Tsai, M. H. (2020). Mate preferences for warmth-trustworthiness predict romantic attraction in the early stages of mate selection and satisfaction in ongoing relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(2), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219855048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentova, J. V., Varella, M. A. C., Bártová, K., Štěrbová, Z., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2017). Mate preferences and choices for facial and body hair in heterosexual women and homosexual men: Influence of sex, population, homogamy, and imprinting-like effect. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(2), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EVOLHUMBEHAV.2016.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houdenhove, E., Enzlin, P., & Gijs, L. (2017). A positive approach toward asexuality: Some first steps, but still a long way to go. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(3), 647–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10508-016-0921-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houdenhove, E., Gijs, L., T’Sjoen, G., & Enzlin, P. (2015). Stories about asexuality: A qualitative study on asexual women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(3), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2014.889053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, K. V., Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Asao, K., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., Aavik, T., Akello, G., Alhabahba, M. M., Alm, C., Amjad, N., Anjum, A., Atama, C. S., Atamtürk Duyar, D., Ayebare, R., Batres, C., Bendixen, M., Bensafia, A., Bizumic, B., & Zupančič, M. (2020). Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: A large-scale replication. Psychological Science, 31(4), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Cao, M., Sauciuvenaite, J., Bissland, R., Hacker, M., Hambly, C., Vaanholt, L. M., Niu, C., Faries, M. D., & Speakman, J. R. (2018). Different impacts of resources on opposite sex ratings of physical attractiveness by males and females. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(2), 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Wu, H., & Sun, Z. S. (2019). The biological basis of sexual orientation: How hormonal, genetic, and environmental factors influence to whom we are sexually attracted. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 55, 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YFRNE.2019.100798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., & Wickham, H. (2016). Data analysis. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (pp. 189–201). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
   Google Scholar
• Ybarra, M. L., Price-Feeney, M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2019). A cross-sectional study examining the (in)congruency of sexual identity, sexual behavior, and romantic attraction among adolescents in the US. The Journal of Pediatrics, 214, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPEDS.2019.06.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yule, M. A., Brotto, L. A., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2015). A validated measure of no sexual attraction: The Asexuality Identification Scale. Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zentner, M., & Mitura, K. (2012). Stepping out of the caveman’s shadow: Nations’ gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1176–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612441004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Lee, A. J., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2019). Are sex differences in preferences for physical attractiveness and good earning capacity in potential mates smaller in countries with greater gender equality? Evolutionary Psychology, 17(2), 147470491985292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919852921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar