Navigating the Role of LGBTQ+ Identity in Self-Disclosure and Strategies Used for Uncertainty Reduction in Online Dating

References

• Abramova, O., Wagner, A., Krasnova, H., & Buxmann, P. (2017). Understanding self-disclosure on social networking sites-A literature review. In 23rd Americas Conference on Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Albury, K., Dietzel, C., Pym, T., Vivienne, S., & Cook, T. (2021). Not your unicorn: Trans dating app users’ negotiations of personal safety and sexual health. Health Sociology Review, 30(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2020.1851610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, A. I., & Wibowo, K. (2011). Online dating services—Chronology and key features comparison with traditional dating. Competition Forum, 9(2), 481–488.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, I. (1977). Privacy regulation: Culturally universal or culturally specific? The Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 66–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. J., & Lucas, K. (2017). Is it safe to bring myself to work? Understanding LGBTQ experiences of workplace dignity. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 34(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday.
   Google Scholar
• Beaber, T. (2008). Well-being among bisexual females: The roles of internalized biphobia, stigma consciousness, social support, and self-disclosure [Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning].
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1974). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
   Google Scholar
• Bivens, R., & Hoque, A. S. (2018). Programming sex, gender, and sexuality: Infrastructural failures in the “feminist” dating app Bumble. Canadian Journal of Communication, 43(3), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2019v44n3a3375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, C., Birnholtz, J., & Abbott, C. (2015). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1117–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814521595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cass, V. C. (1979). Homosexual identity formation: A theoretical model. Journal of Homosexuality, 4(3), 219–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L. S. (2017). Emerging currents in communication/LGBTQ studies: A review of LGBTQ related articles published in communication journals from 2010 to 2015. International Journal of Communication, 11, 22. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6697/2070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C. D., Erby, A. N., Farmer, L. B., & Friday, A. R. (2017). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer identity development. In W. K. Killam & S. Degges-White (Eds.), College student development: Applying theory to practice on the diverse campus (pp. 2647–2668). Springer Publishing Company .
   Google Scholar
• Charbonnier, E., & Graziani, P. (2016). The stress associated with the coming out process in the young adult population. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 20(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2016.1182957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clue. (2017, August 8). Technology and sexuality: Results from Clue and Kinsey’s international sex survey. Hello Clue. https://helloclue.com/articles/sex/technology-modern-sexuality-results-from-clue-kinseys-international-sex-survey
   Google Scholar
• Conner, C. T. (2019). The gay gayze: Expressions of inequality on Grindr. The Sociological Quarterly, 60(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2018.1533394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, K. J. (1988). The relationship of interpersonal trust to self-disclosure when confidentiality is assured. The Journal of Psychology, 122(2), 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1988.9712705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corriero, E., & Tong, S. (2016). Managing uncertainty in mobile dating applications: Goals, concerns of use, and information seeking in Grindr. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157915614872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. L., & McInroy, L. (2014). You can form a part of yourself online: The influence of new media on identity development and coming out for LGBTQ youth. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 18(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2013.777007
   Google Scholar
• Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A.‐K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVito, M., Walker, A., & Birnholtz, J. (2018). Too gay for Facebook. Proceedings Of The ACM On Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274313
   Google Scholar
• Drouin, M., Miller, D., Wehle, S. M. J., & Hernandez, E. (2016). Why do people lie online? “Because everyone lies on the internet.” Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dym, B., Brubaker, J. R., Fiesler, C., & Semaan, B. (2019). “Coming out okay”: Community narratives for LGBTQ identity recovery work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2012). Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media & Society, 14(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassinger, R. E., & Arseneau, J. R. (2007). “I’d rather get wet than be under that umbrella”: Differentiating the experiences and identities of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. In K. J. Bieschke, R. M. Perez, & K. A. DeBord (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender clients (pp. 19–49). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11482-001
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, J. R., & Birnholtz, J. (2019). “I don’t want them to not know” Investigating decisions to disclose transgender identity on dating platforms. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferris, L., & Duguay, S. (2020). Tinder’s lesbian digital imaginary: Investigating (im) permeable boundaries of sexual identity on a popular dating app. New Media & Society, 22(3), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819864903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, C., Birnholtz, J., & Brubaker, J. R. (2015). Social and personal disclosure in a location-based real time dating app. In Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1983–1992). New York, NY: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.237
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Ralston, R. (2016). Queer identity online: Informal learning and teaching experiences of LGBTQ individuals on social media. Computers In Human Behavior, 65, 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33(2), 152–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205285368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Lai, C. H. (2011). First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research, 38(1), 70–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210377091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagno, R. E., Okdie, B. M., & Kruse, S. A. (2012). Dating deception: Gender, online dating, and exaggerated self-presentation. Computers In Human Behavior, 28(2), 642–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, J. T., Toma, C., & Ellison, N. (2007, April). The truth about lying in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 449–452). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240697
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self‐categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x
   Google Scholar
• Jia, R. M., Du, J. T., & Zhao, Y. C. (2021). Needs for relatedness: LGBTQ+ individuals’ information seeking and sharing in an online community. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406522.3446040
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Z., Heng, C. S., & Choi, B. C. F. (2013). Research note—Privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josefsson, U. (2005). Coping with illness online: The case of patients’ online communities. The Information Society, 21(2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240590925357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzel, R. (2018). The power of queer history. The American Historical Review, 123(5), 1560 1582. https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhy202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauckner, C., Truszczynski, N., Lambert, D., Kottamasu, V., Meherally, S., Schipani-McLaughlin, A., Taylor, E., & Hansen, N. (2019). “Catfishing,” cyberbullying, and coercion: An exploration of the risks associated with dating app use among rural sexual minority males. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 23(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2019.1587729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leino-Kilpi, H., Välimäki, M., Dassen, T., Gasull, M., Lemonidou, C., Scott, A., & Arndt, M. (2001). Privacy: A review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 38(6), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(00)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., & McCornack, S. A. (1996). A critical analysis of the behavioral adaptation explanation of the probing effect. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 575–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2012). Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, M., & Hancock, J. T. (2020). Self-disclosure and social media: Motivations, mechanisms and psychological well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, E. A., Janulis, P., Phillips, G., II, Truong, R., & Birkett, M. (2018). Multiple minority stress and LGBT community resilience among sexual minority men. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 5(1), 1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McConnell, E., Néray, B., Hogan, B., Korpak, A., Clifford, A., & Birkett, M. (2018). “Everybody puts their whole life on Facebook”: Identity management and the online social networks of LGBTQ youth. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, K. (2018). Social support and mental health in LGBTQ adolescents: A review of the literature. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 39(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2017.1398283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, K. C., & Pasupathi, M. (2012). Processes of identity development: Where I am and how I got there. Identity, 12(1), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2011.632363
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, J. J., & Kendra, M. S. (2011). Revision and extension of a multidimensional measure of sexual minority identity: The lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(2), 234. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D., & Torres, A. M. (2012). Social networking and online privacy: Facebook users’ perceptions. Irish Journal of Management, 31(2), 63. https://iamireland.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/IJM-312-2012-Final_crop.pdf#page=73
   Google Scholar
• Orr, A. (2003). Meeting, mating, and cheating: How the internet is revolutionizing romance. Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2011). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2020). The virtues and downsides of online dating. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/02/06/the-virtues-and-downsides-of-online-dating/
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part II: Do they really think differently. On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
   Google Scholar
• Ranzini, G., & Lutz, C. (2017). Love at first swipe? Explaining Tinder self-presentation and motives. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916664559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggle, E. D. B., Mohr, J. J., Rostosky, S. S., Fingerhut, A. W., & Balsam, K. F. (2014). A multifactor lesbian, gay, and bisexual positive identity measure (LGB-PIM). Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(4), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000057
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, K., Salamanca, P., & Macapagal, K. (2017). A qualitative study examining young adults’ experiences of disclosure and nondisclosure of LGBTQ identity to health care providers. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(10), 1390–1410. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1321379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff, N., Smoyer, A. B., & Breny, J. (2019). Hope, courage, and resilience in the lives of transgender women of color. The Qualitative Report, 24(8), 1990–2008. http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/scholarly-journals/hope-courage-resilience-lives-transgender-women/docview/2289658396/se-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, K., Kim, S. C., Reddy, M. D., Carter, A. J., Sharma, E., Haimson, O. L., & De Choudhury, M. (2019). The language of LGBTQ+ minority stress experiences on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–22
   Google Scholar
• Samatas, M. (2002). The privacy paradox. Ubiquity.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, R. M., & Tyler, K. A. (2018). The complexity of family reactions to identity among homeless and college lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(4), 1195–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1014-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharabi, L. L., & Dykstra-DeVette, T. A. (2019). From first email to first date: Strategies for initiating relationships in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3389–3407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518822780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzberg, B. H., & Hoobler, G. (2002). Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism. New Media & Society, 4(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriram, N. (2020). Dating data: LGBT dating apps, data privacy, and data security notes. University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2020(2), 507–528. https://illinoisjltp.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Sriram_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Staddon, J., Huffaker, D., Brown, L., & Sedley, A. (2012, July). Are privacy concerns a turn-off? Engagement and privacy in social networks. In Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1145/2335356.2335370
   Google Scholar
• Steel, J. L. (1991). Interpersonal correlates of trust and self-disclosure. Psychological Reports, 68(3_suppl), 1319–1320. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3c.1319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer‐mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, E., & Courtois, C. (2018). From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships: Exploring the experiences of Tinder users. The Information Society, 34(2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1414093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1023–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vella, K., Klarkowski, M., Turkay, S., & Johnson, D. (2020). Making friends in online games: Gender differences and designing for greater social connectedness. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(8), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1625442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogels, E. A. (2020, February 6). 10 facts about Americans and online dating. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/02/06/10-facts-about-americans-and-online-dating/
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, A. E. (2021). Navigating privacy on gay-oriented mobile dating applications. In J. Bailey, A. Flynn, & N. Henry (Eds.), The Emerald international handbook of technology-facilitated violence and abuse (pp. 369–381). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-848-520211027
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J. (2016). Swiping, matching, chatting: Self-presentation and self-disclosure on mobile dating apps. Human IT: Journal for Information Technology Studies as a Human Science, 13(2), 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeless, L. R. (1978). A follow‐up study of the relationships among trust, disclosure, and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00604.x
   Google Scholar
• Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2(4), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00494.x
   Google Scholar
• Xia, P., Ribeiro, B., Chen, C., Liu, B., & Towsley, D. (2013, August). A study of user behavior on an online dating site. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (pp. 243–247)
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, T. E. D., & Fung, T. H. (2016, July). Relationships form so quickly that you won’t cherish them: Mobile dating apps and the culture of instantaneous relationships. In Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1145/2930971.2930973
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Phang, C. W., & Zhang, C. (2022). From the side of both relationship initiator and responder: The importance of look and geographical distance in online dating. Information & Management, 59(2), 103593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar