“I Just Wasn’t Thinking”: Strategic Ambiguity and Women’s Accounts of Unprotected Sex

References

• Angel, K. (2022). Tomorrow sex will be good again: Women and desire in the age of consent. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412445802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., & Hamilton, L. T. (2013). Paying for the party. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & England, P. (2010). Is hooking up bad for young women? Contexts, 9(22), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2010.9.3.22
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, J. J. (2014). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt-Vinti, H. D., Thompson, E. L., & Griner, S. B. (2018). Contraceptive use effectiveness and pregnancy prevention information preferences among heterosexual and sexual minority college women. Women’s Health Issues, 28(4), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2018.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. (2015). ‘They think it’s all up to the girls’: Gender, risk and responsibility for contraception. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(3), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.950983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Schmidt, J., & Robertson, N. (2018). “We’re like the sex CPR dummies”: Young women’s understandings of (hetero) sexual pleasure in university accommodation. Feminism & Psychology, 28(2), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517742500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkett, M., & Hamilton, K. (2012). Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities, 15(7), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712454076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Currier, D. M. (2013). Strategic ambiguity: Protecting emphasized femininity and hegemonic masculinity in the hookup culture. Gender & Society, 27(5), 704–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213493960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, N., Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. (2011). Femininity ideology and sexual health in young women: A focus on sexual knowledge, embodiment, and agency. International Journal of Sexual Health, 23(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2010.524694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalessandro, C., James-Hawkins, L., & Sennott, C. (2019). Strategic silence: College men and hegemonic masculinity in contraceptive decision-making. Gender and Society, 33(5), 772–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243219850061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutcher, H., & McClelland, S. I. (2019). Laboring to make sex “safe”: Sexual vigilance in young US college women. Sex Roles, 81(7), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-1004-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• East, L., Jackson, D., O’Brien, L., & Peters, K. (2011). Condom negotiation: Experiences of sexually active young women. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05451.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endendijk, J. J., van Baar, A. L., & Deković, M. (2020). He is a stud, she is a slut! A meta-analysis on the continued existence of sexual double standards. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(2), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868319891310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farvid, P., Braun, V., & Rowney, C. (2017). ‘No girl wants to be called a slut!’: Women, heterosexual casual sex and the sexual double standard. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(5), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1150818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasula, A. M., Carry, M., & Miller, K. S. (2014). A multidimensional framework for the meanings of the sexual double standard and its application for the sexual health of young black women in the US. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.716874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennell, J. (2006). “It happened one night”: The sexual context of fertility decision-making [Paper presentation]. Population Association of America, Los Angeles, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, J. L. (2011). Men bring condoms, women take pills: Men’s and women’s roles in contraceptive decision making. Gender & Society, 25(4), 496–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211416113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2008). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
   Google Scholar
• Frisco, M. L. (2008). Adolescents’ sexual behavior and academic attainment. Sociology of Education, 81(3), 284–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070808100304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, M. H., Pederson, J. H., Manning, D. J., & Wetter, D. W. (1990). Pardon my gaffe: Effects of sex, status, and consequence severity on accounts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 610. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23(5), 589–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209345829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefner, V., & Wilson, B. J. (2013). From love at first sight to soul mate: The influence of romantic ideals in popular films on young people’s beliefs about relationships. Communication Monographs, 80(2), 150–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.776697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. A., & Hirsch, J. S. (2007). The pleasure deficit: Revisiting the “sexuality connection” in reproductive health. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(4), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1363/3924007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. A., & Hirsch, J. S. (2008). Pleasure, power, and inequality: Incorporating sexuality into research on contraceptive use. American Journal of Public Health, 98(10), 1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2007.115790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlavka, H. R. (2014). Normalizing sexual violence: Young women account for harassment and abuse. Gender & Society, 28(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243214526468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, L., & Ersek, J. (2009). Contraceptive use among sexually active university students. Journal of Womens Health, 18(7), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.08.096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James-Hawkins, L. (2015a). The longitudinal influence of the psychosocial context: Sexuality and contraceptive use in the transition to adulthood [PhD], University of Colorado Boulder.
   Google Scholar
• James-Hawkins, L. (2015b). Why female college students risk pregnancy: I just wasn’t thinking. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 60(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James-Hawkins, L. (2019). Adolescent sexual norms and college sexual experiences: Do high school norms influence college behavior? Advances in Life Course Research, 39, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James-Hawkins, L., Dalessandro, C., & Sennott, C. (2019). Conflicting contraceptive norms for men: Equal responsibility vs. women’s bodily autonomy. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 21(3), 263.277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2018.1464209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javidi, H., Maheux, A. J., Widman, L., Kamke, K., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Peterson, Z. D. (2020). Understanding adolescents’ attitudes toward affirmative consent. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(9), 1100–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1711009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javidi, H., Widman, L., Lipsey, N., Brasileiro, J., Javidi, F., & Jhala, A. (2021). Redeveloping a digital sexual health intervention for adolescents to allow for broader dissemination: Implications for HIV and STD prevention. AIDS Education and Prevention, 33(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2021.33.2.89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N. (2013). The influence of consent on college students’ perceptions of the quality of sexual intercourse at last event. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25(4), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2013.799626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N. (2015). Barriers to affirmative consent policies and the need for affirmative sexuality. U. of Pac. L. Rev, 47, 741. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uoplawreview/vol47/iss4/10
   Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N. (2022). Sexual consent and the prevention of sexual aggression. In L. Orchowski & A. Berkowitz (Eds.), Engaging boys and men in sexual assault prevention (pp. 211–236). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Marcantonio, T. L., & Hunt, M. E. (2017). College students’ sexual consent communication and perceptions of sexual double standards: A qualitative investigation. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. The Journal of Sex Research, 50(6), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.700739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., & Satinsky, S. A. (2013). A gender discrepancy analysis of heterosexual sexual behaviors in two university samples. Journal of Community Health, 38(6), 1157–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9728-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettrey, H. H. (2016). What’s gender got to do with it? Sexual double standards and power in heterosexual college hookups. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(7), 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1145181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimport, K. (2018). More than a physical burden: Women’s mental and emotional work in preventing pregnancy. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(9), 1096–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1311834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid, R., Sennott, C., & Kelly, B. C. (2022). Doing and redoing emphasized femininity: How women use emotion work to manage competing expectations in college hookup culture. Sex Roles, 86(5), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01275-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, V., Imhoff, R., Reininger, K. M., & Briken, P. (2019). Perceptions of sexual script deviation in women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(2), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1280-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, A., & Allison, R. (2018). Gender and hooking up. In J. S. Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 315–327). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_23
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2014). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mullinax, M., Sanders, S., Dennis, B., Higgins, J., Fortenberry, J. D., & Reece, M. (2017). How condom discontinuation occurs: Interviews with emerging adult women. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(4–5), 642–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1143440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46(11), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020488928736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opperman, E., Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rogers, C. (2014). “It feels so good it almost hurts”: Young adults’ experiences of orgasm and sexual pleasure. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.753982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulerwitz, J., Amaro, H., Jong, W. D., Gortmaker, S. L., & Rudd, R. (2002). Relationship power, condom use and HIV risk among women in the USA. AIDS Care, 14(6), 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954012021000031868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, T., & Cusick, L. (2002). Accounting for unprotected sex: Stories of agency and acceptability. Social Science & Medicine, 55(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00162-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righi, M. K., Bogen, K. W., Kuo, C., & Orchowski, L. M. (2021). A qualitative analysis of beliefs about sexual consent among high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(15–16), NP8290–NP8316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519842855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, B., Neaigus, A., & Miller, M. (2005). Street smarts and urban myths: Women, sex work, and the role of storytelling in risk reduction and rationalization. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 19(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2005.19.2.149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. J. (2007). The age of Independence: Interracial unions, same-sex unions, and the changing American family. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.653699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, D. T., Kiefer, A. K., & Ybarra, O. (2006). Sexual submissiveness in women: Costs for sexual autonomy and arousal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/e633962013-209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satinsky, S., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2015). Female sexual subjectivity and verbal consent to receiving oral sex. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(4), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2014.918065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennott, C., & James-Hawkins, L. (2022). Norms, trust, and backup plans: US college women’s use of withdrawal with casual and committed romantic partners. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2039893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swidler, A. (2013). Talk of love: How culture matters. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. E., & Byers, E. S. (2021). An experimental investigation of variations in judgments of hypothetical males and females initiating mixed-gender threesomes: An application of sexual script theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(3), 1129–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01729-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, D. L. (1994). Doing desire: Adolescent girls’ struggles for/with sexuality. Gender & Society, 8(3), 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124394008003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tolman, D. L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 746–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0122-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, D., Striepe, M., & Harmon, T. (2003). Gender matters: Constructing a model of adolescent sexual health. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2015). Sexual script theory: Past, present, and future. In J. DeLamater & R. F. Plante (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of sexualities (pp. 7–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17341-2_2
   Google Scholar
• Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2018). Barriers to the success of affirmative consent initiatives: An application of the social ecological model. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 13(3), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2018.1443300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, M., Jozkowski, K. N., Lo, W. J., & Sanders, S. A. (2018). Are women’s orgasms hindered by phallocentric imperatives? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(6), 1565–1576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1149-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf, S. E., & Maisto, S. A. (2008). Gender differences in condom use behavior? The role of power and partner-type. Sex Roles, 58(9–10), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9381-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar