3,371
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

“I Just Wasn’t Thinking”: Strategic Ambiguity and Women’s Accounts of Unprotected Sex

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Angel, K. (2022). Tomorrow sex will be good again: Women and desire in the age of consent. Verso Books.
  • Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412445802
  • Armstrong, E. A., & Hamilton, L. T. (2013). Paying for the party. Harvard University Press.
  • Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & England, P. (2010). Is hooking up bad for young women? Contexts, 9(22), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2010.9.3.22
  • Arnett, J. J. (2014). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press.
  • Blunt-Vinti, H. D., Thompson, E. L., & Griner, S. B. (2018). Contraceptive use effectiveness and pregnancy prevention information preferences among heterosexual and sexual minority college women. Women’s Health Issues, 28(4), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2018.03.005
  • Brown, S. (2015). ‘They think it’s all up to the girls’: Gender, risk and responsibility for contraception. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(3), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.950983
  • Brown, J., Schmidt, J., & Robertson, N. (2018). “We’re like the sex CPR dummies”: Young women’s understandings of (hetero) sexual pleasure in university accommodation. Feminism & Psychology, 28(2), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517742500
  • Burkett, M., & Hamilton, K. (2012). Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities, 15(7), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712454076
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.
  • Currier, D. M. (2013). Strategic ambiguity: Protecting emphasized femininity and hegemonic masculinity in the hookup culture. Gender & Society, 27(5), 704–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213493960
  • Curtin, N., Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. (2011). Femininity ideology and sexual health in young women: A focus on sexual knowledge, embodiment, and agency. International Journal of Sexual Health, 23(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2010.524694
  • Dalessandro, C., James-Hawkins, L., & Sennott, C. (2019). Strategic silence: College men and hegemonic masculinity in contraceptive decision-making. Gender and Society, 33(5), 772–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243219850061
  • Dutcher, H., & McClelland, S. I. (2019). Laboring to make sex “safe”: Sexual vigilance in young US college women. Sex Roles, 81(7), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-1004-2
  • East, L., Jackson, D., O’Brien, L., & Peters, K. (2011). Condom negotiation: Experiences of sexually active young women. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05451.x
  • Endendijk, J. J., van Baar, A. L., & Deković, M. (2020). He is a stud, she is a slut! A meta-analysis on the continued existence of sexual double standards. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(2), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868319891310
  • Farvid, P., Braun, V., & Rowney, C. (2017). ‘No girl wants to be called a slut!’: Women, heterosexual casual sex and the sexual double standard. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(5), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1150818
  • Fasula, A. M., Carry, M., & Miller, K. S. (2014). A multidimensional framework for the meanings of the sexual double standard and its application for the sexual health of young black women in the US. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.716874
  • Fennell, J. (2006). “It happened one night”: The sexual context of fertility decision-making [Paper presentation]. Population Association of America, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Fennell, J. L. (2011). Men bring condoms, women take pills: Men’s and women’s roles in contraceptive decision making. Gender & Society, 25(4), 496–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211416113
  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2008). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
  • Frisco, M. L. (2008). Adolescents’ sexual behavior and academic attainment. Sociology of Education, 81(3), 284–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070808100304
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
  • Gonzales, M. H., Pederson, J. H., Manning, D. J., & Wetter, D. W. (1990). Pardon my gaffe: Effects of sex, status, and consequence severity on accounts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 610. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.610
  • Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23(5), 589–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209345829
  • Hefner, V., & Wilson, B. J. (2013). From love at first sight to soul mate: The influence of romantic ideals in popular films on young people’s beliefs about relationships. Communication Monographs, 80(2), 150–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.776697
  • Higgins, J. A., & Hirsch, J. S. (2007). The pleasure deficit: Revisiting the “sexuality connection” in reproductive health. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(4), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1363/3924007
  • Higgins, J. A., & Hirsch, J. S. (2008). Pleasure, power, and inequality: Incorporating sexuality into research on contraceptive use. American Journal of Public Health, 98(10), 1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2007.115790
  • Hlavka, H. R. (2014). Normalizing sexual violence: Young women account for harassment and abuse. Gender & Society, 28(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243214526468
  • Huber, L., & Ersek, J. (2009). Contraceptive use among sexually active university students. Journal of Womens Health, 18(7), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.08.096
  • James-Hawkins, L. (2015a). The longitudinal influence of the psychosocial context: Sexuality and contraceptive use in the transition to adulthood [PhD], University of Colorado Boulder.
  • James-Hawkins, L. (2015b). Why female college students risk pregnancy: I just wasn’t thinking. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 60(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12272
  • James-Hawkins, L. (2019). Adolescent sexual norms and college sexual experiences: Do high school norms influence college behavior? Advances in Life Course Research, 39, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.12.001
  • James-Hawkins, L., Dalessandro, C., & Sennott, C. (2019). Conflicting contraceptive norms for men: Equal responsibility vs. women’s bodily autonomy. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 21(3), 263.277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2018.1464209
  • Javidi, H., Maheux, A. J., Widman, L., Kamke, K., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Peterson, Z. D. (2020). Understanding adolescents’ attitudes toward affirmative consent. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(9), 1100–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1711009
  • Javidi, H., Widman, L., Lipsey, N., Brasileiro, J., Javidi, F., & Jhala, A. (2021). Redeveloping a digital sexual health intervention for adolescents to allow for broader dissemination: Implications for HIV and STD prevention. AIDS Education and Prevention, 33(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2021.33.2.89
  • Jozkowski, K. N. (2013). The influence of consent on college students’ perceptions of the quality of sexual intercourse at last event. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25(4), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2013.799626
  • Jozkowski, K. N. (2015). Barriers to affirmative consent policies and the need for affirmative sexuality. U. of Pac. L. Rev, 47, 741. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uoplawreview/vol47/iss4/10
  • Jozkowski, K. N. (2022). Sexual consent and the prevention of sexual aggression. In L. Orchowski & A. Berkowitz (Eds.), Engaging boys and men in sexual assault prevention (pp. 211–236). Elsevier.
  • Jozkowski, K. N., Marcantonio, T. L., & Hunt, M. E. (2017). College students’ sexual consent communication and perceptions of sexual double standards: A qualitative investigation. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12041
  • Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. The Journal of Sex Research, 50(6), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.700739
  • Jozkowski, K. N., & Satinsky, S. A. (2013). A gender discrepancy analysis of heterosexual sexual behaviors in two university samples. Journal of Community Health, 38(6), 1157–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9728-3
  • Kettrey, H. H. (2016). What’s gender got to do with it? Sexual double standards and power in heterosexual college hookups. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(7), 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1145181
  • Kimport, K. (2018). More than a physical burden: Women’s mental and emotional work in preventing pregnancy. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(9), 1096–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1311834
  • Kincaid, R., Sennott, C., & Kelly, B. C. (2022). Doing and redoing emphasized femininity: How women use emotion work to manage competing expectations in college hookup culture. Sex Roles, 86(5), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01275-4
  • Klein, V., Imhoff, R., Reininger, K. M., & Briken, P. (2019). Perceptions of sexual script deviation in women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(2), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1280-x
  • Kuperberg, A., & Allison, R. (2018). Gender and hooking up. In J. S. Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 315–327). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_23
  • Merriam, S. B. (2014). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Mullinax, M., Sanders, S., Dennis, B., Higgins, J., Fortenberry, J. D., & Reece, M. (2017). How condom discontinuation occurs: Interviews with emerging adult women. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(4–5), 642–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1143440
  • Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46(11), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020488928736
  • Opperman, E., Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rogers, C. (2014). “It feels so good it almost hurts”: Young adults’ experiences of orgasm and sexual pleasure. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.753982
  • Pulerwitz, J., Amaro, H., Jong, W. D., Gortmaker, S. L., & Rudd, R. (2002). Relationship power, condom use and HIV risk among women in the USA. AIDS Care, 14(6), 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954012021000031868
  • Rhodes, T., & Cusick, L. (2002). Accounting for unprotected sex: Stories of agency and acceptability. Social Science & Medicine, 55(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00162-9
  • Righi, M. K., Bogen, K. W., Kuo, C., & Orchowski, L. M. (2021). A qualitative analysis of beliefs about sexual consent among high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(15–16), NP8290–NP8316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519842855
  • Roche, B., Neaigus, A., & Miller, M. (2005). Street smarts and urban myths: Women, sex work, and the role of storytelling in risk reduction and rationalization. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 19(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2005.19.2.149
  • Rosenfeld, M. J. (2007). The age of Independence: Interracial unions, same-sex unions, and the changing American family. Harvard University Press.
  • Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.653699
  • Sanchez, D. T., Kiefer, A. K., & Ybarra, O. (2006). Sexual submissiveness in women: Costs for sexual autonomy and arousal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/e633962013-209
  • Satinsky, S., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2015). Female sexual subjectivity and verbal consent to receiving oral sex. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(4), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2014.918065
  • Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092239
  • Sennott, C., & James-Hawkins, L. (2022). Norms, trust, and backup plans: US college women’s use of withdrawal with casual and committed romantic partners. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2039893
  • Swidler, A. (2013). Talk of love: How culture matters. University of Chicago Press.
  • Thompson, A. E., & Byers, E. S. (2021). An experimental investigation of variations in judgments of hypothetical males and females initiating mixed-gender threesomes: An application of sexual script theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(3), 1129–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01729-4
  • Tolman, D. L. (1994). Doing desire: Adolescent girls’ struggles for/with sexuality. Gender & Society, 8(3), 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124394008003003
  • Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Harvard University Press.
  • Tolman, D. L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 746–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0122-x
  • Tolman, D., Striepe, M., & Harmon, T. (2003). Gender matters: Constructing a model of adolescent sexual health. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552162
  • Wiederman, M. W. (2015). Sexual script theory: Past, present, and future. In J. DeLamater & R. F. Plante (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of sexualities (pp. 7–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17341-2_2
  • Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2018). Barriers to the success of affirmative consent initiatives: An application of the social ecological model. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 13(3), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2018.1443300
  • Willis, M., Jozkowski, K. N., Lo, W. J., & Sanders, S. A. (2018). Are women’s orgasms hindered by phallocentric imperatives? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(6), 1565–1576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1149-z
  • Woolf, S. E., & Maisto, S. A. (2008). Gender differences in condom use behavior? The role of power and partner-type. Sex Roles, 58(9–10), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9381-3