112
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue Articles

Preliminary Evidence of Validity for the Verbally Pressured and Illegal Sexual Exploitation Modules of the Sexual Experiences Survey-Victimization

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all

References

  • Abbey, A., Helmers, B. R., Jilani, Z., McDaniel, M. C., & Benbouriche, M. (2021). Assessment of men’s sexual aggression against women: An experimental comparison of three versions of the Sexual Experiences Survey. Psychology of Violence, 11(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000378
  • Abbey, A., Jacques‐Tiura, A. J., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011). Risk factors for sexual aggression in young men: An expansion of the confluence model. Aggressive Behavior, 37(5), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20399
  • Abbey, A., Parkhill, M. R., & Koss, M. P. (2005). The effects of frame of reference on responses to questions about sexual assault victimization and perpetration. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00236.x
  • Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, white women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
  • Anderson, R. E., Cahill, S. P., & Delahanty, D. L. (2018). The psychometric properties of the Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV) and characteristics of sexual victimization experiences in college men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 19(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000073
  • Anderson, R. E., Cahill, S. P., & Delahanty, D. L. (2019). Discordance between the Sexual Experiences Surveys—Short forms and the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale in college men. Psychology of Violence, 9(4), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000199
  • Anderson, R. E., Carstens Namie, E. M., Michel, P. K., & Delahanty, D. L. (2022). Study title-based framing effects on reports of sexual violence and associated risk factors in college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17–18), NP15359–NP15383. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211016349
  • Anderson, R. E., & Cuccolo, K. (2021). An experimental test of the impact of varying questionnaire response format on prevalence rates for sexual violence victimization and perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24), NP23541–NP23562. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211064239
  • Anderson, R. E., & Delahanty, D. L. (2020). Discrepant responding across measures of college students’ sexual victimization experiences: Conceptual replication and extension. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(5), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1669135
  • Anderson, R. E., Garcia, M., & Delahanty, D. L. (2021). Test–retest reliabilities of four tactic-first sexual violence history questionnaires. Psychology of Violence, 11(6), 580–590. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000384
  • Anderson, R. E., Goodman, E. L., & Carstens Namie, E. M. (2023). Participant acceptability of questionnaires impacts sexual victimization prevalence rates. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 32(6), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2023.2240778
  • Anderson, R. E., Goodman, E. L., & Ciampaglia, A. M. (2021). An initial test of the tactic-first and item-order hypotheses: Accounting for response discrepancies in sexual victimization questionnaires. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09584-8
  • Anderson, R. E., Goodman, E. L., & Thimm, S. S. (2020). The assessment of forced penetration: A necessary and further step toward understanding men’s sexual victimization and women’s perpetration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 36(4), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986220936108
  • Anderson, R. E., Peterson, Z. D., Canan, S., Abbey, A., McCauley, H., Orchowski, L. M., Fedina, L., Littleton, H., & Koss, M. P. (2024). Words can hurt: A taxonomy of the verbally pressured sexual exploitation in the SES-V. The Journal of Sex Research, 61(6), 882–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2358414
  • Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Kresnow, M., Khatiwada, S., & Leemis, R. W. (2022). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2016/2017 REPORT ON SEXUAL VIOLence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs/nisvsReportonSexualViolence.pdf
  • Belli, R. F. (1998). The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory, 6(4), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/741942610
  • Buday, S. K., & Peterson, Z. D. (2015). Men’s and women’s interpretation and endorsement of items measuring self-reported heterosexual aggression. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(9), 1042–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.967373
  • Canan, S. N., Jozkowski, K. N., Wiersma-Mosley, J. D., Bradley, M., & Blunt-Vinti, H. (2021). Differences in lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual women’s experiences of sexual assault and rape in a national U.S. sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19–20), 9100–9120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519863725
  • Cascardi, M., & Muzyczyn, B. (2016). Concordant responding on the physical assault/abuse subscales of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales 2 and Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory. Psychology of Violence, 6(2), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039128
  • Crossley, T. F., & Kennedy, S. (2002). The reliability of self-assessed health status. Journal of Health Economics, 21(4), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00007-3
  • Davis, K. C., Gilmore, A. K., Stappenbeck, C. A., Balsan, M. J., George, W. H., & Norris, J. (2014). How to score the Sexual Experiences Survey? A comparison of nine methods. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037494
  • Dietz, T. L., & Jasinski, J. L. (2007). The effect of item order on partner violence reporting: An examination of four versions of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Social Science Research, 36(1), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.04.006
  • DiLillo, D., Fortier, M. A., Hayes, S. A., Trask, E., Perry, A. R., Messman-Moore, T., Fauchier, A., & Nash, C. (2006). Retrospective assessment of childhood sexual and physical abuse: A comparison of scaled and behaviorally specific approaches. Assessment, 13(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106288391
  • Evans, M., Gregory, A., Feder, G., Howarth, E., & Hegarty, K. (2016). “Even ‘daily’ is not enough”: How well do we measure domestic violence and abuse?—A think-aloud study of a commonly used self-report scale. Violence and Victims, 31(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00024
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  • Fisher, B. S. (2009). The effects of survey question wording on rape estimates: Evidence from a quasi-Experimental design. Violence Against Women, 15(2), 133147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208329391
  • Fisher, B. S., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). Measuring the sexual victimization of women: Evolution, current controversies, and future research. Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, 4, 185–543. https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/measuring-sexual-victimization-women-evolution-current-controversies-and
  • Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393
  • Jeffrey, N. K., & Senn, C. Y. (2024). Gender differences in sexual violence perpetration behaviors and validity of perpetration reports: A mixed-method study. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2322591
  • Johnson, S. M., Murphy, M. J., & Gidycz, C. A. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Sexual Experiences Survey—Short Forms Victimization and perpetration. Violence and Victims, 32(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00110
  • Kirkpatrick, C., & Kanin, E. (1957). Male sex aggression on a university campus. American Sociological Review, 22(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088765
  • Koss, M. P., Anderson, R. E., Littleton, H., Kowalski, R., Thompson, M., Canan, S., White, J., Lopez, E., Allen, C. T., & Orchowski, L. (2024). The revised Sexual Experiences Survey Victimization version (SES-V): Conceptualization, modifications, items, and scoring. Journal of Sex Research, 61(6), 839–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2358407
  • Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162
  • Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(3), 455–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.50.3.455
  • Kowalski, R. M., & Thompson, M. (2024). Expanding the Sexual Experiences Survey to include technology facilitated sexual exploitation. The Journal of Sex Research, 61(6), 897–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2244939
  • Littleton, H., Downs, E., & Rudolph, K. (2020). The sexual victimization experiences of men attending college: A mixed methods investigation. Sex Roles, 83(9–10), 595–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01133-1
  • Marcantonio, T. L., Willis, M., & Dobbs, P. (2022). Examining women’s sexual assault victimization experiences since entering college via two behavioral assessments. The Journal of Sex Research, 59(6), 780–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1994912
  • Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
  • Moreau, C., Boucher, S., Hébert, M., & Lemelin, J. (2014). Capturing sexual violence experiences among battered women using the Revised Sexual Experiences Surveys and the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0345-8
  • Peterson, Z. D., Littleton, H. L., Anderson, R. E., & Koss, M. P. (2024). Quantifying criminal sexual acts: The illegal sexual exploitation module of the revised Sexual Experiences Survey-Victimization (SES-V) measure. The Journal of Sex Research, 61(6), 868–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2359049
  • Ramirez, I. L., & Straus, M. A. (2006). The effect of question order on disclosure of intimate partner violence: An experimental test using the Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Family Violence, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-9000-4
  • Russell, D. E. H., & Miller, D. L. (1979). The prevalence of rape and sexual assault. Final Report to the National Institute of Mental Health (ROI-MH-28960) (NCJ 85788). US Government Printing Office.
  • Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and content. Academic Press.
  • Schuster, I., Tomaszewska, P., Marchewka, J., & Krahé, B. (2020). Does question format matter in assessing the prevalence of sexual aggression? A methodological study. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(4), 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1777927
  • Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Bohner, G., Harlacher, U., & Kellenbenz, M. (1991). Response scales as frames of reference: The impact of frequency range on diagnostic judgements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050104
  • Shorey, R. C., Strauss, C., Woods, W. C., & Cornelius, T. L. (2016). The effect of item order on psychological aggression reporting: An examination with the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse. Partner Abuse, 7(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.7.2.125
  • Smith, S., Chen, J., Lowe, A., & Basile, K. (2021). Sexual violence victimization of U.S. males: Negative health conditions associated with rape and being made to penetrate. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21–22), NP20953–NP20971. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211055151
  • Strang, E., & Peterson, Z. D. (2017). Unintentional misreporting on self-report measures of sexually aggressive behavior: An interview study. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1304519
  • Strang, E., Peterson, Z. D., Hill, Y. N., & Heiman, J. R. (2013). Discrepant responding across self-report measures of men’s coercive and aggressive sexual strategies. The Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.646393
  • Testa, M., Hoffman, J. H., Lucke, J. F., & Pagnan, C. E. (2015). Measuring sexual aggression perpetration in college men: A comparison of two measures. Psychology of Violence, 5(3), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037584
  • Testa, M., VanZile-Tamsen, C., Livingston, J. A., & Koss, M. P. (2004). Assessing women’s experiences of sexual aggression using the Sexual Experiences Survey: Evidence for validity and implications for research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(3), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00143.x
  • Tomaszewska, P., Schuster, I., Marchewka, J., & Krahé, B. (2021). Order effects of presenting coercive tactics on young adults’ reports of sexual victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19–20), NP17784–NP17806. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211030012
  • Tourangeau, R., Singer, E., & Presser, S. (2003). Context effects in attitude surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 31(4), 486–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124103251950
  • Trottier, D., Laflamme, K., Guay, J.-P., & Benbouriche, M. (2023). French validation of the Tactics First-Sexual Experiences Survey–Perpetrator in heterosexual men. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000372
  • Uniform Crime Report, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (n.d.). Rape. Crime in the US, 2017: Topic pages: Rape. Retrieved June 21, 2023, from https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/topic-pages/rape
  • United Nations General Assembly. (2021). A framework for legislation on rape (model rape law), Pub. L. No. GE.21-07952(E), A/HRC/47/26/Add.1 1. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G21/149/63/PDF/G2114963.pdf?OpenElement
  • Weare, S. (2018). From coercion to physical force: Aggressive strategies used by women against men in “forced-to-penetrate” cases in the UK. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(8), 2191–2205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1232-5

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.