The Liking-Similarity Effect: Perceptions of Similarity as a Function of Liking

REFERENCES

• Ames, D. R. (2004). Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 340–353. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amodio, D. M., & Showers, C. J. (2005). ‘Similarity breeds liking’ revisited: The moderationg role of commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 817–836. doi:10.1177/0265407505058701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson, E., & Festinger, L. (1958). Some attempts to measure tolerance for dissonanance. (U.S. Air Force WADC Technical Report No. 58-942). Lackland Air Force Base, Texas: Personnel Laboratory, Wright Air Development Center, Air Research and Development Command, United States Air Force.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L.M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernieri, F. J., Gillis, J. S., Davis, J. M., & Grahe, J. E. (1996). Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgment across situations: A lens model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 110–129. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.71.1.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolster, B. I., & Springbett, B. M. (1961). The reaction of interviewers to favorable and unfavorable information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45(2), 97–103. doi:10.1037/h0048316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W., & Cohen, A. R. (1962). Explorations in cognitive dissonance. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1037/11622-000
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. L., Asher, T., & Cialdini, R. B. (2005). Evidence of a positive relationship between age and preference for consistency. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 517–533. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunswick, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction as a function of affiliation need and attitude similarity. Human Relations, 14, 283–289. doi:10.1177/001872676101400305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 417–431. doi:10.1177/0265407597143008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., Bond, M. H., & Diamond, M. J. (1969). Response to political candidates as a function of attitude similarity-dissimilarity. Human Relations, 22, 251–262. doi:10.1177/001872676902200305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., Clore, G. L.,, & Smeaton, G. (1986). The attraction hypothesis: Do similar attitudes affect anything? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1167–1170. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., Clore, G. L., & Worchel, P. (1966). Effect of economic similarity-dissimilarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 220–224. doi:10.1037/h0023559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., Griffitt, W., & Stefaniak, D. (1967). Attraction and similarity of personality characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(1), 82–90. doi:10.1037/h0021198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, J. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 141–156. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.1.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Barbaranelli, C., & Fraley, R. C. (2007). When likeness goes with liking: The case of political preference. Political Psychology, 28, 609–632. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00592.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, J. M., & Aronson, E. (1963). Some hedonic consequences of confirmation and disconfirmation of expectances. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 151–156. doi:10.1037/h0042692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. R., Baron, R. S., & Inman, M. L. (2006). Misperceptions in intergroup conflict: Disagreeing about what we disagree about. Psychological Science, 17(1), 38–45. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. R., Schlenker, B. R., & Collisson, B. (2013). Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological Science, 24(2), 140–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 111–125. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Trost, M. R., & Newsom, J. T. (1995). Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 318–328. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.2.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, R. W., & Kruerger, J. (2002). Social categorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 219–231. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, R. W., & Krueger, J. (2000). The primacy of self-referent information in perceptions of social consensus. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 279–299. doi:10.1348/014466600164471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, R. M., & Mulford, M. (1996). The false consensus effect and overconfidence: Flaws in judgments or flaws in how we study judgment? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 201–211. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., & Waytz, A. (2010). Mind perception. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Giblert, & G. Lindzey ( Eds.), Handbook of social psychology ( pp. 498–541). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fast, L. A., & Funder, D. C. (2008). Personality as manifest in word use: Correlations with self-report, acquaintance-report, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 334–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, F. E., Warrington, W. G., Blaisdell, F. J. (1952). Unconscious attitudes as correlates of sociometeric choice in a social group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 790–796. doi:10.1037/h0054812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furr, R. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R. (1994). A lens-mapping framework for understanding the encoding and decoding of interpersonal dispositions in nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 398–412. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.2.398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, K. A., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Ickes, W. (2009). The role of empathic accuracy in adolescents’ peer relations and adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 997–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2010). Preference for consistency and social influence: A review of current research findings. Social Influence, 5, 152–163. doi:10.1080/15534510903332378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 21, 107–112. doi:10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. W., Lyons, J., & Perlmutter, H. V. (1951). Induction of forces in discussion groups. Human Relations, 4, 57–76. doi:10.1177/001872675100400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human, L. J., & Biesanz, J. C. (2011). Through the looking glass clearly: Accuracy and assumed similarity in well-adjusted individuals’ first impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 349–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human, L. J., & Biesanz, J. C. (2012). Accuracy and assumed similarity in first impressions of personality: Differing associations at different levels of analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 106–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ickes, W. (2003). Everyday mind reading: Understanding what other people think and feel. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ickes, W. (2009). Empathic accuracy: Its links to clinical, cognitive, developmental, social, and physiological psychology. In J. Decety, & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy, ( pp. 57–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ickes, W. J. ( Ed.). (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John ( Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Carvallo, M., & Mirenberg, M. C. (2004). How do I love thee? Let me count the Js: Implicit egotism and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 665–683. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2010). Data analysis in social psychology: Recent and recurring issues. In S.T. Fiske, D.T. Giblert, & G. Lindzey ( Eds.), Handbook of social psychology ( pp. 115–142). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., McClelland, G. H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115–134. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.6.2.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, J. (1972). Motives and development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22(1), 51–66. doi:10.1037/h0032356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 596–610. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, J., & Stanke, D. (2001). The role of self-referent and other-referent knowledge in perceptions of group characteristics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulleting, 27, 878–888. doi:10.1177/0146167201277010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., & Quadflieg, S. (2010). Perceiving people. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Giblert, & G. Lindzey ( Eds.), Handbook of social psychology ( pp. 426–463). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1960). Cognitive consistency and attitude change. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 345–353. doi:10.1037/h0048563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889–922. doi:10.1177/0265407508096700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morry, M. M. (2005). Relationship satisfaction as a predictor of similarity ratings: A test of the attraction-similarity hypothesis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 561–584. doi:10.1177/0265407505054524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morry, M. M. (2007). The attraction-similarity hypothesis among cross-sex friends: Relationship satisfaction, perceived similarities, and self-serving perceptions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(1), 117–138. doi:10.1177/0265407507072615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morry, M. M., Kito, M., & Ortiz, L. (2011). The attraction-similarity model and dating couples: Projection, perceived similarity, and psychological benefits. Personal Relationships, 18(1), 125–143. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01293.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., Bellavia, G., Griffin, D. W., & Dolderman, D. (2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 563–581. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.4.563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomb, T. M. (1953). Social psychology and group processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 4, 183–214. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.04.020153.001151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419. doi:10.1145/1869086.1869094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, J. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1), 32–47. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. Oxford, UK: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, M. E. (1986). The repulsion hypothesis: On the nondevelopment of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1156–1166. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, E. E., & Insko, C. A. (1964). Cognitive consistency and performance in the autokinetic situation. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 184–192. doi:10.1037/h0041242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., & Blackstone, T. (1995). When the head protects the heart: Empathic accuracy in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 269–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suls, J., & Wan, C. K. (1987). In search of the false-uniqueness phenomenon: Fear and estimates of social consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 211–217. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.52.1.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546–558. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, J. & Watson, D. (2009). Friend or foe? Differential use of the self-based heuristic as a function of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 77, 731–760. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00563.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P.D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115–1125. doi:10.1177/01461672992512005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, R. S. (1974). Cognitive organization and change: An information processing approach. Oxford, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1960). The concepts of balance, congruity, and dissonance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 280–296. doi:10.1086/266949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar