When First Comes Love (or Lust): How Romantic and Sexual Cues Bias First Impressions in Online Social Networking

REFERENCES

• Ambady, N., & Skowronski, J. J. ( Eds.). (2008). First impressions. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. A., Deuser, W. E., & DeNeve, K. M. (1995). Hot temperatures, hostile affect, hostile cognition, and arousal: Tests of a general model of affective aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 434–448. doi:10.1177/0146167295215002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, A., & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535–551. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubrey, J., & Frisby, C. M. (2011). Sexual objectification in music videos: A content analysis comparing gender and genre. Mass Communication & Society, 14, 475–501. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.513468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachen, C. M., & Illouz, E. (1996). Imagining romance: Young people’s cultural models of romance and love. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 13, 279–308. doi:10.1080/15295039609366983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, L. (1984). Some effects of thoughts on anti- and prosocial influences of media events: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 410–427. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.95.3.410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobkowski, P. S., Brown, J. D., & Neffa, D. R. (2012). “Hit me up and we can get down”: US youths’ risk behaviors and sexual self-disclosure in MySpace profiles. Journal of Children and Media, 6, 119–134. doi:10.1080/17482798.2011.633412
   Google Scholar
• Brivio, E., & Ibarra, F. (2009). Self presentation in blogs and social networks. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 7, 113–115.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D., & L’Engle, K. L. (2009). X-Rated: Sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with U.S. early adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit media. Communication Research, 36, 129–151. doi:10.1177/0093650208326465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D., L’Engle, K. L., Pardun, C. J., Guo, G., Kenneavy, K., & Jackson, C. (2006). Sexy media matter: Exposure to sexual content in music, movies, television, and magazines predicts Black and White adolescents’ sexual behavior. Pediatrics, 117, 1018–1027. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown Givens, S. M., & Monahan, J. L. (2005). Priming mammies, jezebels, and other controlling images: An examination of the influence of mediated stereotypes on perceptions of an African American woman. Media Psychology, 7, 87–106. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0701_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. (2007). The evolution of human mating. Acta Psychologia Sinica, 39, 502–512.
   Google Scholar
• Calfin, M. S., Carroll, J. L., & Schmidt, J. (1993). Viewing music-videotapes before taking a test of premarital sexual attitudes. Psychological Reports, 72, 475–481. doi:10.2466/pr0.1993.72.2.475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J. A., McNair, L. D., Corbin, W. R., & Williams, M. (1999). Gender differences related to heterosexual condom use: The influence of negotiation styles. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 25, 217–225. doi:10.1080/00926239908403996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, A., Martino, S. C., Collins, R. L., Elliott, M. N., Berry, S. H., Kanouse, D. E., & Miu, A. (2008). Does watching sex on television predict teen pregnancy? Findings from a national longitudinal survey of youth. Pediatrics, 122, 1047–1054. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-3066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corneille, O., Vescio, T. K., & Judd, C. M. (2000). Incidentally activated knowledge and stereotype based judgments: A consideration of primed construct-target attribute match. Social Cognition, 18, 377–399. doi:10.1521/soco.2000.18.4.377
   Google Scholar
• Cougle, J. R., & Hawkins, K. A. (2013). Priming of courageous behavior: Contrast effects in spider fearful women. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69, 896–902. doi:10.1002/jclp.21961
   Google Scholar
• DeCoster, J. & Claypool, H. M. (2004). A meta-analysis of priming effects on impression formation supporting a general model of informational biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 2–27. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Giudice, M. (2011). Sex differences in romantic attachment: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 193–214. doi:10.1177/0146167210392789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman Carpentier, F. R. (2014, in press). When sex is on the air: Impression formation after exposure to sexual music. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Journal. doi:10.1007/s12119-014-9223-8
   Google Scholar
• Dillman Carpentier, F. R., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Blumhoff, A. (2007). Naughty versus nice: Suggestive pop music influences on perceptions of potential romantic partners. Media Psychology, 9, 1–18. doi:10.1080/15213260709336800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman Carpentier, F. R., Northup, C. T., & Parrott, M. S. (2014). Revisiting media priming effects of sexual depictions: Replication, extension, and consideration of sexual depiction strength. Media Psychology, 17, 34–54. doi:10.1080/15213269.2013.870045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman Carpentier, F. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. B. (2008). A test of the network models of political priming. Media Psychology, 11, 186–206. doi:10.1080/15213260801994220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing-Matibag, T. M., & Geisinger, B. (2009). Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: A health belief model perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1196–1209. doi:10.1177/1049732309344206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Brenner, J. (2013). The demographics of social media users—2012. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/02/14/the-demographics-of-social-media-users-2012/
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2013). Social media update 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/12/30/social-media-update-2013/
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but … : A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E-Score. (2013, June 24). Appeal of top social media sites declining despite record usage. [Blog post.] Retrieved from http://blog.epollresearch.com/2013/06/24/appeal-of-top-social-media-sites-declining-despite-record-usage/
   Google Scholar
• Eyal, K. & Kunkel, D. (2008). The effects of sex in television drama shows on emerging adults’ sexual attitudes and moral judgments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 161–181. doi:10.1080/08838150801991757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. A., Hill, D. L., Grube, J. W., & Gruber, E. L. (2004). Sex on American television: An analysis across program genres and network types. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 529–553. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4804_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, J. & Moore, S. M. (2002). Relationship satisfaction: The role of love styles and attachment styles. Current Research in Social Psychology, 7, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, S., Zillmann, D., & Mitrook, M. (1997). Stereotyping effect of black women’s sexual rap on white audiences. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 381–399. doi:10.1207/15324839751037020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. & Reiber, C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2, 192–208. doi:10.1037/h0099345
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, L. T., Kowal, E., DeCosmo, K., & Bacha, A. (1985). Informational requests about male and female targets: The importance of sexual information. Journal of Sex Research, 21, 443–448. doi:10.1080/00224498509551281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillath, O., Mikulincer, M., Birnbaum, G. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Does subliminal exposure to sexual stimuli have the same effects on men and women? Journal of Sex Research, 44, 111–121. doi:10.1080/00224490701263579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzaga, G. C., Turner, R. A., Keltner, D., Campos, B., & Altemus, M. (2006). Romantic love and sexual desire in close relationships. Emotion, 6, 163–179. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haferkamp, C. J. (1999). Beliefs about relationships in relation to television viewing, soap opera viewing, and self-monitoring. Current Psychology, 18, 193–204. doi:10.1007/s12144-999-1028-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A., & Kruck, J. (2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 91–98. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammock, G. & Richardson, D. S. (2011). Love attitudes and relationship experience. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 608–624. doi:10.1080/00224545.2010.522618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, C. H. (1989). Priming sex-role stereotypic event schemas with rock music videos: Effects on impression favorability, trait inferences, and recall of a subsequent male-female interaction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 371–391. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1004_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1991). Constructing personality and social reality through music: Individual differences among fans of punk and heavy metal music. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35, 335–350. doi:10.1080/08838159109364129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). How rock music videos can change what’s seen when boy meets girl: Priming stereotypic appraisal of social interaction. Sex Roles, 19, 287–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, C. H., & Krygowski, W. (1994). Arousal-augmented priming effects: Rock music videos and sex object schemas. Communication Research, 21, 24–47. doi:10.1177/009365094021001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, M. A., & Shortall, J. C. (2011). Women and men in love: Who really feels it and says it first? The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 727–736. doi:10.1080/00224545.2010.522626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1987). Love and sexual attitudes, self-disclosure and sensation seeking. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 4, 281–297. doi:10.1177/026540758700400303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 980–988. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106–1115. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, P. M., Sherman, S. J., & Fazio, R. H. (1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323–340. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski ( Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Bargh, J. A., & Lombardi, W. (1985). Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 59–69. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.11.1.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., & King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. Kihlstrom ( Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 69–121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart, C. W. (1958). The incidence of romanticism during courtship. Social Forces, 36, 362–367. doi:10.2307/2573977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, B. M. (2007). In search of my “one-and-only”: Romance-related media and beliefs in romantic relationship destiny. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 17(3–4). Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/017/3/01735.HTML
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. A., Hunter, J. E., & Hodge, C. N. (1995). Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 108–122. doi:10.2307/2787149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Towards an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8–23. doi:10.1080/00224490009552016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karremans, J. C., Dotsch, R., & Corneille, O. (2011). Romantic relationship status biases memory of faces of attractive opposite-sex others: Evidence from a reverse-correlation paradigm. Cognition, 121, 422–426. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.07.008
   Google Scholar
• Knox, D., & Sporakowski, M. (1968). Attitudes of college students toward love. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 638–642. doi:10.2307/349508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kray, L. J., & Locke, C. C. (2008). To flirt or not to flirt? Sexual power at the bargaining table. Negotiation Journal, 24, 483–493. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00199.x
   Google Scholar
• Kunkel, D., Eyal, K., Finnerty, K., Biely, E., & Donnerstein, E. (2005). Sex on TV 4. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, M., & Lenhart, A. (2006). Online dating. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2006/03/05/online-dating/
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. P. (2005). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9780203338001
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M. (2007). Examining the mediators of agenda setting: A new experimental paradigm reveals the role of emotions. Political Psychology, 28, 689–717. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, B., & Adams, G. (1978). Correlates of romantic love revisited. Journal of Psychology, 98, 211–214. doi:10.1080/00223980.1978.9915963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472–489. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331–341. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, F., & Cate, R. (2000). Partner preferences: What characteristics do men and women desire in their short-term sexual and long-term romantic partners? Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 12, 1–21. doi:10.1300/J056v12n03_01
   Google Scholar
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Dillman Carpentier, F. R. (2008). Media priming: An updated synthesis. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver ( Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 3rd ed. (pp. 74–93). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493–517. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992). Assimilation and contrast effects in attitude measurement: An inclusion/exclusion model. Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 72–77.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, S. (1991). Romantic longings: Love in America, 1830–1980. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, G., & Miller, O. S. (2013). Effects of gender and physical attractiveness on visual attention to Facebook profiles. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 20–24. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (1998). Knowledge acquisition, accessibility, and use in person perception and stereotyping: Simulation with a recurrent connectionist network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 21–35. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., & Laan, E. (2004). Conscious processing of sexual information: Mechanisms of appraisal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 369–380. doi:10.1023/B:ASEB.0000028890.08687.94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R.S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.10.1660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 841–856. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.38.6.841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L., & Sears, D. O. (2000). Person perception: Forming impressions of others. In N. Roberts, B. Webber, & J. Cohen ( Eds.), Social Psychology (pp. 62–97). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. E., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2012). Gender differences in associations of sexual and romantic stimuli: Do young men really prefer sex over romance? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 949–957. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9794-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. M, & Wasserman, T. H. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 6, 1173–1181. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9841-2
   Google Scholar
• Van Tongeren, D. R., Welch, R. D., Davis, D. E., Green, J. D., & Worthington, E. R. (2012). Priming virtue: Forgiveness and justice elicit divergent moral judgments among religious individuals. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 405–415. doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.707228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, L. M., & Friedman, K. (2006). Using TV as a guide: Associations between television viewing and adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 133–156. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, L. M., & Rivadeneyra, R. (1999). Contributions of entertainment television to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and expectations: The role of viewing amount versus viewer involvement. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 237–249. doi:10.1080/00224499909551994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisbuch, M., Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2009). On being liked on the web and in the “real world”: Consistency in first impressions across personal webpages and spontaneous behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 573–576. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, R. S., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Gorman, T. F. (1985). Cognitive mediators of reactions to rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 324–338. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, M. Z., Mahood, C., & Linz, D. (2010). Sexual priming, gender stereotyping, and likelihood to sexually harass: Examining the cognitive effects of playing a sexually-explicit video game. Sex Roles, 62, 77–88. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9695-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar