3,653
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Mutual friends’ social support and self-disclosure in face-to-face and instant messenger communication

, &
Pages 430-445 | Received 22 Dec 2016, Accepted 23 Oct 2017, Published online: 26 Dec 2017

References

  • Abeele, M. V., Schouten, A. P., & Antheunis, M. L. (2016). Personal, editable, and always accessible: An affordance approach to the relationship between adolescents mobile messaging behavior and their friendship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(6), 875–893. doi:10.1177/0265407516660636
  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Baams, L., Jonas, K. J., Utz, S., Bos, H., & Van Der Vuurst, L. (2011). Internet use and online social support among same sex attracted individuals of different ages. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1820–1827. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.002
  • Bazarova, N. N., & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 635–657. doi:10.1111/jcom.2014.64.issue-4
  • Berg, J. H., & Derlega, V. J. (1987). Themes in the study of self-disclosure. In V. J. Derlega (Ed.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 1–8). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Boyd, D. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Busse, B., & Fuchs, M. (2012). The components of landline telephone survey coverage bias. The relative importance of no-phone and mobile-only populations. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1209–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9431-3
  • Chu, P. S., Saucier, D. A., & Hafner, E. (2010). Meta-analysis of the relationships between social support and well-being in children and adolescents. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(6), 624–645. doi:10.1521/jscp.2010.29.6.624
  • Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
  • Cozby, P. C. (1973). Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79(2), 73–91. doi:10.1037/h0033950
  • Cui, D. (2016). Beyond “connected presence”: Multimedia mobile instant messaging in close relationship management. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157915583925
  • Derlega, V. J. (1987). Self-disclosure: Inside or outside the mainstream of social psychological research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3(2), 27–34.
  • Derlega, V. J., & Grzelak, J. (1979). Appropriateness of self-disclosure. In G. J. Chelune (Ed.), Self-disclosure. origins, patterns, and implications of openness in interpersonal relationships (pp. 151–176). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Desjarlais, M., & Joseph, J. J. (2017). Socially interactive and passive technologies enhance friendship quality: An investigation of the mediating roles of online and offline self-disclosure. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(5), 286–291. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0363
  • Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Brooks, K. (2009). Nature of social support. In H. T. Reis, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 1565–1570). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.
  • Dunkel-Schetter, C., Feinstein, L., & Call, J. (1986). UCLA social support inventory Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
  • Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Steinfield, C., & Vitak, J. (2011). With a little help from my friends: How social network sites affect social capital processes. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 124–145). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • eMarketer. (2017). Snapchat is becoming a daily habit in Germany: Everyday use more than tripled in 2016. Retrieved from https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Snapchat-Becoming-Daily-Habit-Germany/1015732
  • Fehr, B. (2008). Friendship formation. In S. Sprecher, S. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 29–54). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382. doi:10.2307/3150980
  • Gabler, S., & Ayhan, Ö. (2007). Gewichtung bei erhebungen im festnetz und über mobilfunk: ein dual frame ansatz [Weighing in survey based on landline telephone networks and mobile phone networks: A dual frame approach]. ZUMA Nachrichten Spezial, 13, 13–46.
  • Haber, M. G., Cohen, J. L., Lucas, T., & Baltes, B. B. (2007). The relationship between self-reported received and perceived social support: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 133–144. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9100-9
  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24(10),1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187
  • Hayes, R. A., Carr, C. T., & Wohn, D. Y. (2016). One click, many meanings: Interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127248
  • Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146185
  • Hu, Y., Wood, J. F., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM: Examining the relationship between instant messaging and intimacy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), 0. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00231.x
  • Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177–192. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
  • Jourard, S. M. (1971). The transparent self (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
  • Kahn, J. H., & Hessling, R. M. (2001). Measuring the tendency to conceal versus disclose psychological distress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20(1), 41–65. doi:10.1521/jscp.20.1.41.22254
  • Kennedy, C. (2007). Evaluating the effects of screening for telephone service in dual frame RDD surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(5), 750–771. doi:10.1093/poq/nfm050
  • Knapp, M. L., & Vangelisti, A. (1992). Interpersonal communication and human relationships. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Knop, K., Öncü, J. S., Penzel, J., Abele, T. S., Brunner, T., Vorderer, P., & Wessler, H. (2016). Offline time is quality time. Comparing within-group self-disclosure in mobile messaging applications and face-to-face interactions. Computers in human behavior, 55, 1076–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.004
  • Ko, H. C., & Kuo, F. Y. (2009). Can blogging enhance subjective well-being through self-disclosure? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.016
  • Licoppe, C. (2004). “Connected” presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(1), 135–156. doi:10.1068/d323t
  • Miller, L. C., Berg, J. H., & Archer, R. L. (1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1234–1244. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1234
  • Mitchell, T. R., & James, L. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 530–547.
  • Newsom, J. T. (2015). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Omarzu, J. (2000). A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 174–185. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_05
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2011a). A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. New York, NY: Routledges.
  • Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.). (2011b). A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Pew Research Center. (2015). Mobile messaging and social media 2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/
  • Quattrone, G. A., & Jones, E. E. (1978). Selective self-disclosure with and without correspondent performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 511–526. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(78)90046-X
  • Regan, P. (2011). Close relationships. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Reich, S. M., Subrahmanyam, K., & Espinoza, G. (2012). Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: Overlap in adolescents’ online and offline social networks. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 356–368. doi:10.1037/a0026980
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/ doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Sass, D. A., & Smith, P. L. (2006). The effects of parceling unidimensional scales on structural parameter estimates in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(4), 566–586. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1304_4
  • Schroeder, R. (2010). Mobile phones and the inexorable advance of multimodal connectedness. New Media & Society, 12(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809355114
  • Schwarzer, R. (1991). University of California—Social Support Inventory: German Version. Retrieved from http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/gesund/skalen/UCLA-SSI_deutsch/ucla-ssi_deutsch.htm
  • Schwarzer, R., & Knoll, N. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. International Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 243–252. doi:10.1080/00207590701396641
  • Sprecher, S., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of relationship initiation. New York, NY: Psychology Press..
  • Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 143–189.
  • Trepte, S., & Reinecke, L. (2013). The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure. A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1102–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.002
  • Trepte, S., & Scharkow, M. (2016). Friends and lifesavers: How social capital and social support received in media environments contribute to well-being. In L. Reinecke, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Routledge handbook of media use and well-being (pp. 305–316). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Trepte, S., Dienlin, T., & Reinecke, L. (2014). Influence of social support received in online and offline contexts on satisfaction with social support and satisfaction with life. A longitudinal study. Media Psychology, 18(1), S.74–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.838904.
  • Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.076
  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267–277. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267
  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). The effect of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents existing friendships. A longitudinal study. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01405.x
  • Vitak, J. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732140
  • Vitak, J., & Kim, J. (2014). “You can’t block people offline”: Examining how Facebook’s affordances shape the disclosure process. Proceedings of the CSCW ‘14 Baltimore, MD: CSCW..
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication. Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001
  • WhatsApp. (2016). About whatsapp. Retrieved from https://www.whatsapp.com/about/?l=en
  • Wortman, C. B., & Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1987). Conceptual and methodological issues in the study of social support. In A. Baum, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and health (5th ed., pp. 63–108). Hillsdale, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.