Cell phone-induced ostracism threatens fundamental needs

References

• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 941–952. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benenson, J. F., Markovits, H., Hultgren, B., Nguyen, T., Bullock, G., & Wrangham, R. (2013). Social exclusion: More important to human females than males. PLoS ONE, 8, e55851. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böckler, A., Hömke, P., & Sebanz, N. (2014). Invisible man: Exclusion from shared attention affects gaze behavior and self-reports. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 140–148. doi:10.1177/1948550613488951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2011a). Mobile communication and civil society: Linking patterns and places of use to engagement with others in public. Human Communication Research, 37, 207–222. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01399.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2011b). Political involvement in ‘mobilized’ society: The interactive relationships among mobile communication, network characteristics, and political participation. Journal of Communication, 61, 1005–1024. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01601.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor, J. (1999). Comments on coincidence: Comparing the findings on retrospective reports of fear. Media Psychology, 1, 141–143. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0102_3
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, S., & Schofield, W. N. (1998). Lifesavers and Samaritans: Emergency use of cellular (mobile) phones in Australia. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30, 815–819. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00034-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Williams, K. D., Fitness, J., & Newton, N. C. (2008). When hurt will not heal: Exploring the capacity to relive social and physical pain. Psychological Science, 19, 789–795. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02158.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyranowski, J. M., Frank, E., Young, E., & Shear, K. (2000). Adolescent onset of the gender difference in lifetime rates of major depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 21–27. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.57.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64, 644–658. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292. doi:10.1126/science.1089134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayant, M., Muller, D., Hubertus Joseph Hartgerink, C., & Lantian, A. (2014). Is ostracism by a despised outgroup really hurtful? A replication and extension of Gonsalkorale and Williams (2007). Social Psychology, 45, 489–494. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, J. A., & Kruger, D. J. (2012). Is cell phone use socially contagious? Human Ethology Bulletin, 27, 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Knowles, M. L. (2005). Social “snacking” and social “shielding”: The satisfaction of belonging needs through the use of social symbols and the social self. In K. D. Williams, J. Forgas, & W. Von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godwin, A., MacNevin, G., Zadro, L., Iannuzzelli, R., Weston, S., Gonsalkorale, K., & Devine, P. (2014). Are all ostracism experiences equal? A comparison of the autobiographical recall, Cyberball, and O-Cam paradigms. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 660–667. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0408-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalkorale, K., & Williams, K. D. (2007). The KKK won’t let me play: Ostracism even by a despised outgroup hurts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1176–1186. doi:10.1002/ejsp.392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, A. L., & Wu, Y. (2016). Public cellphone use does not activate negative responses in others… Unless they hate cellphones. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21, 384–398. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, K., & Cantor, J. (1999). Tales from the screen: Enduring fright reactions to scary media. Media Psychology, 1, 97–116. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0102_1
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1–22. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89. doi:10.1080/19312450709336664
   Google Scholar
• Hitlan, R. T., Zárate, M. A., Kelly, K. M., & DeSoto, M. C. (2016). Linguistic ostracism causes prejudice: Support for a serial mediation effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156, 422–436. doi:10.1080/00224545.2015.1119668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, B., & Park, N. (2010). In-person contact begets calling and texting: Interpersonal motives for cell phone use, face-to-face interaction, and loneliness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 611–618. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., & Levine, J. M. (2008). The detection of social exclusion: Evolution and beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 39–52. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.12.1.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koudenburg, N., Postmes, T., & Gordijn, E. H. (2011). Disrupting the flow: How brief silences in group conversations affect social needs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 512–515. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, D. J., Duan, A., Juhasz, D., Phaneuf, C. V., Sreenivasa, V., Saunders, C., … Misevich, S. L. (2017). Cell phone use latency in a university area population in the Midwestern USA. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 2, 56–59. doi:10.1007/s41347-017-0012-8
   Google Scholar
• Kushlev, K., & Heintzelman, S. J. (2017). Put the phone down: Testing a complement-interfere model of computer-mediated communication in the context of face-to-face interactions. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1948550617722199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R. (1990). Responses to social exclusion: Social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 221–229. doi:10.1521/jscp.1990.9.2.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R. (1999). Making sense of self-esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 32–35. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9
   Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive: The self-esteem system as a sociometer. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 123–144). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Licoppe, C. (2004). ‘Connected’ presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 135–156. doi:10.1068/d323t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 202–223. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M. F., Tatkow, E. P., & Macrae, C. N. (2005). The look of love: Gaze shifts and person perception. Psychological Science, 16, 236–239. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00809.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). ‘Technoference’: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 85–98. doi:10.1037/ppm0000065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48, 275–298. doi:10.1177/0013916514539755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, S. L., Bellavia, G., Feeney, B., Holmes, J. G., & Rose, P. (2001). The contingencies of interpersonal acceptance: When romantic relationships function as a self-affirmational resource. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 163–189. doi:10.1023/A:1010618010115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okdie, B. M., Ewoldsen, D. R., Muscanell, N. L., Guadagno, R. E., Eno, C. A., Velez, J. A., … Smith, L. R. (2014). Missed programs (you can’t TiVo this one): Why psychologists should study media. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 180–195. doi:10.1177/1745691614521243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015). U. S. Smartphone use in 2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, C. L., Gardner, W. L., & Knowles, M. (2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1095–1107. doi:10.1177/0146167203262085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 237–246. doi:10.1177/0265407512453827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/
   Google Scholar
• Riva, P., Montali, L., Wirth, J. H., Curioni, S., & Williams, K. D. (2017). Chronic social exclusion and evidence for the resignation stage: An empirical investigation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 541–564. doi:10.1177/0265407516644348
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. T., Davies, K., Hung, M., & Wright, S. C. (2010). Identity moderates the effects of Christmas displays on mood, self-esteem, and inclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1017–1022. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shilling, A. A., & Brown, C. M. (2016). Goal-driven resource redistribution: An adaptive response to social exclusion. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 10, 149–167. doi:10.1037/ebs0000062
   Google Scholar
• Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 757–769. doi:10.1177/0146167211406434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21–36. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 1–5. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beest, I., & Williams, K. D. (2006). When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 918–928. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beest, I., Williams, K. D., & van Dijk, E. (2011). Cyberbomb: Effects of being ostracized from a death game. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 581–596. doi:10.1177/1368430210389084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanden Abeele, M. P., Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562–569. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R., & Lo, V. (2006). Staying connected while on the move: Cell phone use and social connectedness. New Media & Society, 8, 53–72. doi:10.1177/1461444806059870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselmann, E. D., Cardoso, F. D., Slater, S., & Williams, K. D. (2012). To be looked at as though air: Civil attention matters. Psychological Science, 23, 166–168. doi:10.1177/0956797611427921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselmann, E. D., Grzybowski, M. R., Steakley-Freeman, D. M., DeSouza, E. R., Nezlek, J. B., & Williams, K. D. (2016). Social exclusion in everyday life. In P. Riva, & J. Eck (Eds.), Social exclusion: Psychological approaches to understanding and reducing its impact (pp. 3–23). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wesselmann, E. D., Nairne, J. S., & Williams, K. D. (2012). An evolutionary social psychological approach to studying the effects of ostracism. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6, 309–328. doi:10.1037/h0099249
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: Effects of being excluded and ignored. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 275–314). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D., Cheung, C., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D., Shore, W. J., & Grahe, J. E. (1998). The silent treatment: Perceptions of its behaviors and associated feelings. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 117–141. doi:10.1177/1368430298012002
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, J. H., Sacco, D. F., Hugenberg, K., & Williams, K. D. (2010). Eye gaze as relational evaluation: Averted eye gaze leads to feelings of ostracism and relational devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 869–882. doi:10.1177/0146167210370032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadro, L., Boland, C., & Richardson, R. (2006). How long does it last? The persistence of the effects of ostracism in the socially anxious. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 692–697. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar