Protecting my turf: The moderating role of generational differences on the relationships between self-direction and hedonism values and reactions to generational diversity

References

• Allen, R. S., Allen, D. E., Karl, K., & White, C. S. (2015). Are millennials really an entitled generation? An investigation into generational equity sensitivity differences. Journal of Business Diversity, 15, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2003). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 295–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 249–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbrock, F., Christ, O., Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). Differential effects of intergroup contact for authoritarians and social dominators: A dual process model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(4), 477–490. doi:10.1177/0146167211429747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., Meade, A. W., & Wiebe, E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 800–813. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettis, R. A., & Hitt, M. A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 7–19. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, I., Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Does the value circle exist within persons or only across persons? Journal of Personality, 85(2), 151–162. doi:10.1111/jopy.12228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickson, S. (2000). The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational outcomes in demographically diverse settings. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 82–101. doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, T., & Stalker, G. (1961). The management of innovation. London, UK: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1975). On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist, 30(12), 1103–1126. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.30.12.1103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, W. K., Campbell, S. M., Siedor, L. E., & Twenge, J. M. (2015). Generational differences are real and useful. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(3), 324–331. doi:10.1017/iop.2015.43
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. D. (1990). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise (Vol. 120). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, E., & Allen, T. D. (2012). Relationship between work interference with family and parent–Child interactive behavior: Can guilt help? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 276–287. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza, D. P., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2015). Generationally based differences in the workplace: Is there a there there? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8(4), 308–323. doi:10.1017/iop.2015.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. E., & Kukenberger, M. R. (2016). A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership–Team performance relations. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1964–1991. doi:10.1177/0149206314525205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Meuse, K. P., & Hostager, T. J. (2001). Developing an instrument for measuring attitudes toward and perceptions of workplace diversity: An initial report. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(1), 33–51. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1532-1096
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation . New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G., Rasheed, A. M., McLaughlin, K. J., & Priem, R. L. (1995). The new corporate architecture. The Academy of Management Executive, 9(3), 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Liao, H., Chuang, A., Zhou, J., & Campbell, E. M. (2015). Fostering employee service creativity: Joint effects of customer empowering behaviors and supervisory empowering leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1364–1380. doi:10.1037/a0038969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fast, N. J., Sivanathan, N., Mayer, N. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Power and overconfident decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 249–260. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T., Woodyatt, L., & McKee, I. R. (2012). Predicting support for social action: How values, justice-related variables, discrete emotions, and outcome expectations influence support for the stolen generations. Motivation and Emotion, 36(4), 516–528. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9262-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, A. A. (2016). How generational differences will impact America’s aging workforce: Strategies for dealing with aging Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers. Strategic HR Review, 15(6), 250–257. doi:10.1108/SHR-08-2016-0068
   Google Scholar
• Foster, K. (2013). Generation and discourse in working life stories. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 195–215. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, R. (2018). Millennials are the largest generation in the U.S. labor force. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/11/millennials-largest-generation-us-labor-force/
   Google Scholar
• Fung, H. H., Ho, Y. W., Tam, K. P., Tsai, J., & Zhang, X. (2011). Values moderate age differences in relationship orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 994–999. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, J. B., & Riley, A. C. (2018). Generational differences in narcissism and narcissistic traits. In A. D. Herman, A. B. Brunell, & J. D. Foster (Eds.), Handbook of Trait Narcissism (pp. 183–191). Chambridge, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, N. S., & Bartol, K. M. (2016). Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 159–198. doi:10.1111/peps.12108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 583–606. doi:10.1177/0146167211432765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holladay, C. L., Knight, J. L., Paige, D. L., & Quiñones, M. A. (2003). The influence of framing on attitudes toward diversity training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(3), 245–263. doi:10.1002/hrdq.v14:3
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, J. D., Pearce, C. L., Manz, C. C., Courtright, S., & Stewart, G. L. (2015). Sharing is caring: Toward a model of proactive caring through shared leadership. Human Resource Management Review, 25(3), 313–327. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2014.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2009). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., & Johnson, L. (2010). Generations, Inc.: From boomers to linksters - Managing the friction between generations at work. New York, NY: AMACOM.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., Franz, G., & Martocchio, J. J. (2010). Unpacking generational identities in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 392–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 528). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kidder, D. L., Lankau, M. J., Chrobot-Mason, D., Mollica, K. A., & Friedman, R. A. (2004). Backlash toward diversity initiatives: Examining the impact of diversity program justification, personal and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(1), 77–102. doi:10.1108/eb022908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klute, M. M., Crouter, A. C., Sayer, A. G., & McHale, S. M. (2002). Occupational self‐direction, values, and egalitarian relationships: A study of dual‐earner couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(1), 139–151. doi:10.1111/jomf.2002.64.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12), pp. 333–375. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ksendzova, M., Iyer, R., Hill, G., Wojcik, S. P., & Howell, R. T. (2015). The portrait of a hedonist: The personality and ethics behind the value and maladaptive pursuit of pleasure. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 68–74. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunze, F., Boehm, S., & Bruch, H. (2013). Organizational performance consequences of age diversity: Inspecting the role of diversity friendly HR policies and top managers’ negative age stereotypes. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 413–442. doi:10.1111/joms.2013.50.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2003). When generations collide: Who they are, why they clash, how to solve the generational puzzle at work. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lemay, E. P., Jr., Overall, N. C., & Clark, M. S. (2012). Experiences and interpersonal consequences of hurt feelings and anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 982–1006. doi:10.1037/a0030064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, S. W., Standifer, R. L., Schultz, N. J., & Windsor, J. M. (2012). Actual versus perceived generational differences at work: An empirical examination. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(3), 341–354. doi:10.1177/1548051812442747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebermann, S. C., Wegge, J., Jungmann, F., & Schmidt, K. H. (2013). Age diversity and individual team member health: The moderating role of age and age stereotypes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(2), 184–202. doi:10.1111/joop.12016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, S., & Kuron, L. (2014). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 139–157. doi:10.1002/job.1913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, S. T., Duxbury, L., & Higgins, C. (2007). An empirical assessment of generational differences in basic human values. Psychological Reports, 101(2), 339–352. doi:10.2466/pr0.101.2.339-352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge: Collected works (Vol. 5, pp. 276–322). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, R. (1986). Company strategy and organizational design. London, UK: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Millennials: Coming of Age. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/pages/millennials/
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1989). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, E., & Urwin, P. (2011). Generational differences in work values: A review of theory and evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 79–96. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2011.13.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Martinez, A. G., Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2012). Class, chaos, and the construction of community. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 949–962. doi:10.1037/a0029673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polman, E. (2012). Self–Other decision making and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 141–150. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271–320. doi:10.1080/10463280601055772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ros, M., Schwartz, S. H., & Surkiss, S. (1999). Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 49–71. doi:10.1111/apps.1999.48.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. M., King, E. B., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2015). Younger workers’ metastereotypes, workplace mood, attitudes, and behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(1), 54–70. doi:10.1108/JMP-07-2014-0215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safer, M. (2007). 60 Minutes: The “Millennials” are coming [television broadcast]. New York, NY: CBS Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Sagiv, L., Sverdlik, N., & Schwarz, N. (2011). To compete or to cooperate? Values’ impact on perception and action in social dilemma games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 64–77. doi:10.1002/ejsp.v41.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45. doi:10.1111/josi.1994.50.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2003). A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. In Questionnaire development report of the European Social Survey (ch. 7). Retrieved from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/methodology/core_ess_questionnaire/ESS_core_questionnaire_human_values.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual values. In A. Tamayo & J. Porto (Eds.), Valores e trabalho [Values and work] (pp. 56–95). Brasilia: Editora Universidade de Brasilia.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in psychology and culture. doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1116
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (1997). Influences of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18(2), 385–410. doi:10.1111/pops.1997.18.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 878–891. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Cotterill, S., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Kteily, N., & Carvacho, H. (2016). Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. In C. G. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 149–187). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy‐Skeffington, J., Ho, A. K., Sibley, C., & Duriez, B. (2013). You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 313–323. doi:10.1111/jopy.12008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456–476. doi:10.1177/1094428109351241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silfver, M., Helkama, K., Lönnqvist, J. E., & Verkasalo, M. (2008). The relation between value priorities and proneness to guilt, shame, and empathy. Motivation and Emotion, 32(2), 69–80. doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9084-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. B., & Schwartz, S. H. (1997). Values. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 77–118). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, B. (2015). Who are Europe’s Millennials? Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/02/09/who-are-europes-millennials/
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. L., & Deadrick, D. L. (2015). Challenges and opportunities affecting the future of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 139–145. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausch, N., & Hewstone, M. (2010). Social dominance orientation attenuates stereotype change in the face of disconfirming information. Social Psychology, 41(3), 169–176. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., & Keeter, S. (2010). Millennials: Confident. Connected. Open to change. Pew Research Center, 24, 1–149.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, L., Green, E. G., & Sidanius, J. (2008). We will hunt them down: How social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(6), 1455–1464. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonidandel, S., & LeBreton, J. M. (2015). RWA web: A free, comprehensive, web-based, and user-friendly tool for relative weight analyses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 207–216. doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9351-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonidandel, S., LeBreton, J. M., & Johnson, J. W. (2009). Determining the statistical significance of relative weights. Psychological Methods, 14, 387–399. doi:10.1037/a0017735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchione, M., Casconi, T., & Barbaranelli, C. (2009). Assessing the circular structure of the portrait values questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 231–238. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.25.4.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R. M., Rodell, J. B., & Lynch, J. W. (2016). Engaged and productive misfits: How job crafting and leisure activity mitigate the negative effects of value incongruence. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1561–1584. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfradt, U., & Dalbert, C. (2003). Personality, values and belief in a just world. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(8), 1911–1918. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00040-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S. I., & Giessner, S. R. (2018). The thin line between empowering and laissez-faire leadership: An expectancy-match perspective. Journal of Management, 44(2), 757–783. doi:10.1177/0149206315574597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata, C. P., Olsen, J. E., & Martins, L. L. (2013). Social exchange from the supervisor’s perspective: Employee trustworthiness as a predictor of interpersonal and informational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (2013). Generations at work: Managing the clash of Boomers, Gen Xers, and Gen Yers in the workplace. New York, NY: AMACOM.
   Google Scholar