Affective responses to non-sexual imagery depicting gay men and lesbian women

References

• Bishop, C. J. (2015). Emotional reactions of heterosexual men to gay imagery. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(1), 51–66. doi:10.1080/00918369.2014.957125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, T. T., & Champagne, M. M. (2002). The effects of gender and sexual orientation on the acceptability of public displays of affection. FSU Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 5(1). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.framingham.edu/journal_of_behavioral_sciences/vol5/iss1/4
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, T. R., Hall, D. L., & Tuttle, J. (2009). Attitudes toward stereotypical versus counterstereotypical gay men and lesbians. The Journal of Sex Research, 46(4), 274–281. doi:10.1080/00224490802666233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan, L., Miller, L. R., & Loehr, A. (2015). The power of love: The role of emotional attributions and standards in heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbian and gay couples. Social Forces, 94(1), 401–425. doi: 10.1093/sf/sov047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., & White, L. A. (1983). Emotional barriers to contraception. In D. Byrne & W. A. Fisher (Eds.), Adolescents, sex, and contraception (pp. 207–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• GLAAD. (2017). Where we are on TV report: 2017-2018. Retrieved from http://glaad.org/files/WWAT/WWAT_GLAAD_2017-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, P. (2006). Where’s the sex in sexual prejudice? Gay and Lesbian Psychology Review, 7(3), 264–275.
   Google Scholar
• Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. The Journal of Sex Research, 25(4), 451–477. doi:10.1080/00224498809551476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kercher, K. (1992). Assessing subjective well-being in the old-old: The PANAS as a measure of orthogonal dimensions of positive and negative affect. Research on Aging, 14(2), 131–168. doi:10.1177/0164027592142001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiebel, E. M., McFadden, S. L., & Herbstrith, J. C. (2017). Disgusted but not afraid: Feelings toward same-sex kissing reveal subtle homonegativity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(3), 263–278. doi:10.1080/00224545.2016.1184127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 336–353. doi:10.1177/0146167296224002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2001). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings (Technical Report A-5). The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Mahaffey, A. L., Bryan, A., & Hutchison, K. E. (2005). Using startle eye blink to measure the affective component of antigay bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(1), 37–45. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2701_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteau, T., & Bekker, H. (1992). The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). British Journal of Psychology, 31(3), 301–306. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, D. T., Morrison, T. G., McDonagh, L. K., & O’Doherty, A. M. C. (2012). A test of prejudice reduction towards lesbian women: The effects of imaginary contact on explicit and implicit homonegativity. In T. G. Morrison, M. A. Morrison, M. Carrigan., & D. T. McDermott (Eds.), Sexual minority research in the new millennium (pp. 187–204). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, D. T., Brooks, A. S., Rohleder, P., Blair, K., Hoskin, R. A., & McDonagh, L. K. (2018). Ameliorating transnegativity: assessing the immediate and extended efficacy of a pedagogic prejudice reduction intervention. Psychology & Sexuality, 9(1), 69–85. doi:10.1080/19419899.2018.1429487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, J. K. L., & Parry, D. C. (2017). Women’s leisure as a political practice: A feminist analysis of Orange is the New Black. Leisure Sciences, 39(6), 492–505. doi:10.1080/01490400.2016.1203848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monto, M. A., & Supinski, J. (2014). Discomfort with homosexuality: A new measure captures differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 61(6), 899–916. doi:10.1080/00918369.2014.870816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, M. A., Bishop, C. J., & Morrison, T. G. (2018). What is the best measure of discrimination against trans people?: A systematic review of the psychometric literature. Psychology & Sexuality, 9(3), 269–287. doi:10.1080/19419899.2018.1484798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G. (2002). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 43(2), 15–37. doi:10.1300/J082v43n02_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, C. L. (1976). On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 83(4), 579–586. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45(4), 867–872. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, D. J., & Zeichner, A. (2005). Effects of sexual prejudice and anger on physical aggression toward gay and heterosexual men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6(1), 3–17. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.6.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993-2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0017504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin-Willams, R. C. (2006). Who’s gay? Does it matter? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(1), 40–44. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(4), 15–37. doi:10.1300/J082v51n04_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sink, A., & Mastro, D. (2018). Mediated contact with gay men as a predictor of modern of homonegativity: An analysis of exposure to characters appearing on television between 2000 and 2015. Communication Reports, 32(2), 78–90. doi:10.1080/08934215.2017.1360374
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227–242. doi:10.1177/0022022106297301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tluczek, A., Henriques, J. B., & Brown, R. L. (2009). Support for the reliability and validity of a six-item anxiety scale derived from the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 17(1), 19–28. doi:10.1891/1061-3749.17.1.19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule – expanded form. Retrieved from http://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=psychology_pubs
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar