1,761
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

When an academic culture based on self-enhancement values undermines female students’ sense of belonging, self-efficacy, and academic choices

Pages 373-389 | Received 14 Jan 2019, Accepted 26 Sep 2019, Published online: 10 Oct 2019

References

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
  • Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., Murphy, M. C., & Cimpian, A. (2018). Messages about brilliance undermine women’s interest in educational and professional opportunities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76(January), 404–420. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.006
  • Butler, L. P., & Walton, G. M. (2013). The opportunity to collaborate increases preschoolers’ motivation for challenging tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(4), 953–961. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.06.007
  • Carr, P. B., & Walton, G. M. (2014). Cues of working together fuel intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 169–184. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.015
  • DEPP. (2018). Filles et garçons sur le chemin de l’égalité de l’école à l’enseignement supérieur. [Girls and boys on the way to equality from school to university]. Retrieved from: http://www.education.gouv.fr/cid57113/filles-et-garcons-sur-le-chemin-de-l-egalite-de-l-ecole-a-l-enseignement-superieur-edition-2018.html
  • Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., Delmas, F., Pulfrey, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Achievement goal promotion at university: Social desirability and social utility of mastery and performance goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 119–134. doi:10.1037/a0012824
  • Diekman, A. B., Clark, E. K., Johnston, A. M., Brown, E. R., & Steinberg, M. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 902–918. doi:10.1037/a0025199
  • European Commission. (2012). Gender in research and innovation.  Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
  • Fiske, E. B., & UNESCO. (2012). Atlas mondial de l’égalité des genres dans l’éducation [The world atlas on gender equality in education]. France, Paris: HarperCollins.
  • Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717. doi:10.1037/a0026659
  • Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 79–90. doi:10.1177/095968369100100211
  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Giffen, C. J., Blair, S. S., Rouse, D. I., & Hyde, J. S. (2014). Closing the social class achievement gap for first-generation students in undergraduate biology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 375–389. doi:10.1037/a0034679
  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Priniski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2015). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 745–765. doi:10.1037/pspp0000075
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Hirshfield, L. E. (2010). “She won’t make me feel dumb”: Identity threat in a male-dominated discipline. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 2(1), 6–24.
  • Jury, M., Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., & Butera, F. (2016). The social utility of performance-approach goals in a selective educational environment. Social Psychology of Education. doi:10.1007/s11218-016-9354-
  • Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & Mccoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 486–507. doi:10.1177/0049124114543236
  • Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. doi:10.1126/science.1261375
  • Lober Newsome, J. (2008). The chemistry PhD : The impact on women’s retention. London, UK. Retrieved from: https://www.rsc.org/globalassets/02-about-us/our-strategy/diversity-community-hub/2008-chemistry-phd_imapct-on-womens-retention.pdf
  • Major, B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 393–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137
  • Meyer, M., Cimpian, A., & Leslie, S. J. (2015). Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(MAR), 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00235
  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., … Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. Ann Arbor, 1001, 48109–1259
  • Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat. How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879–885. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
  • Rudasill, K. M., & Callahan, C. M. (2010). Academic self-perceptions of ability and course planning among academically advanced students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(2), 300–329. doi:10.1177/1932202X1002100206
  • Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–20. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116
  • Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 1010–1028. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010
  • Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel-Lifschitz, T. (2009). Cross-national variation in the size of sex differences in values: Effects of gender equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 171–185. doi:10.1037/a0015546
  • Simpson, R. (2004). Masculinity at work: The experiences of men in female dominated occupations. Work, Employment and Society, 18(2), 349–368. doi: 10.1177/09500172004042773
  • Smeding, A., Darnon, C., Souchal, C., Toczek-Capelle, M. C., & Butera, F. (2013). Reducing the socio-economic status achievement gap at University by promoting mastery-oriented assessment. PloS One, 8(8), 1–6. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071678
  • Sommet, N., Pulfrey, C., & Butera, F. (2013). Did my M.D. really go to University to learn? Detrimental effects of numerus clausus on self-efficacy, mastery goals and learning. PloS One, 8(12), 1–15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084178
  • Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities ’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197. doi:10.1037/a0027143
  • Toma, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Hidden profiles and concealed information: Strategic information sharing and use in group decision making. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(6), 793–806. doi:10.1177/0146167209333176
  • Verniers, C., & Martinot, D. (2015). Characteristics expected in fields of higher education and gender stereotypical traits related to academic success: A mirror effect. Social Psychology of Education, 11218. doi:10.1007/s11218-015-9312-z
  • Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82–96. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
  • Walton, G. M., Cohen, G. L., Cwir, D., & Spencer, S. J. (2012). Mere belonging: The power of social connections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 513–532. doi:10.1037/a0025731
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Muller, D., & Judd, C. M. (2004). Adjusting researchers approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 424–431. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.