References
- Bailey, J. M., Gaulin, S., Agyei, Y., & Gladue, B. A. (1994). Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1081–1093. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1081
- Baranowski, A. M., & Hecht, H. (2015). Gender differences and similarities in receptivity to sexual invitations: Effects of location and risk perception. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(8), 2257–2265. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0520-6
- Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
- Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 2(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J056v02n01_04
- Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2010). Mate value and mate preferences: An investigation into decisions made with and without constraints. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 835–839. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.004
- Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2014). The mate value scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 64(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.005
- Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2017). Sex differences in jealousy: A 25 year retrospective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 259–302.
- Henss, R. (1995). Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness. replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(4), 479–488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00093-L
- Lee, A. J., Mitchem, D. G., Wright, M. J., Martin, N. G., Keller, M. C., & Zietsch, B. P. (2016). Facial averageness and genetic quality: Testing heritability, genetic correlation with attractiveness, and the paternal age effect. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.08.003
- Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). Women’s sexual strategies: The evolution of long-term bonds and extra-pair sex. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17, 59–100.
- Scherer, C. R., Akers, E. G., & Kolbe, K. L. (2013). Bisexuals and the sex differences in jealousy hypothesis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(8), 1064–1071. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513481446
- Schützwohl, A., Fuchs, A., McKibbin, W. F., & Shackleford, T. K. (2009). How willing are you to accept sexual requests from slightly unattractive to exceptionally attractive imagined requestors? Human Nature, 20(3), 282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-009-9067-3
- Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870–883. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870
- Tappé, M., Bensmana, L., Hayashia, K., & Hatfield, E. (2013). Gender differences in receptivity to footnote: Sexual offers: A new research prototype. Interpersona, 7(2), 1–23.
- Voracek, M., Hofhansl, A., & Fisher, M. L. (2005). Clark and Hatfield’s evidence of women’s low receptivity to male strangers’ sexual offers revisited. Psychological Reports, 97(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/PR0.97.5.11-20