In defense of leader misconduct: the use of neutralization techniques by ingroup members

References

• Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G., & Travaglino, G. A. (2013). A double standard when group members behave badly: Transgression credit to ingroup leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(5), 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams, D., Travaglino, G. A., Randsley de Moura, G., & May, P. L. (2014). A step too far? Leader racism inhibits transgression credit. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 730–735. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amira, K., Wright, J. C., & Goya-Tocchetto, D. (2021). In-group love versus out-group hate: Which is more important to partisans and when? Political Behavior, 43, 473–494. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09557-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. In R. M. Kramer & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 25, pp. 1–52). Elsevier Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BBC News. (2019) White House ‘tried to cover up details of Trump-Ukraine call’. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada–49842895
   Google Scholar
• Bhal, K. T., & Leekha, N. D. (2008). Exploring cognitive moral logics using grounded theory: The case of software piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9537-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, A., Bump, P., & Uraizee, I. (2020, January 27). The full Trump-Ukraine impeachment timeline. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/politics/trump-impeachment-timeline/
   Google Scholar
• Britannica, T. (2021, March 30). United States presidential election results. Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/United-States-Presidential-Election-Results-1788863
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, T. A. (2014). Applying neutralization theory to fair trade buying behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(2), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J., & Hogg, M. A. (2007). Feeling the anguish of others: A theory of vicarious dissonance. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 359–403). Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bock, T., & Van Kenhove, P. (2011). Double standards: The role of techniques of neutralization. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0654-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliason, S. L., & Dodder, R. A. (2000). Neutralization among deer poachers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(4), 536–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540009600493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fandos, N., & Shear, M. (2019, December 18). Trump impeached for abuse of power and obstruction of congress. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/18/us/politics/trump-impeached.html
   Google Scholar
• Gellerman, S. W. (1986). Why ‘good’ managers make bad ethical choices. Harvard Business Review, 64(July), 85–90. https://hbr.org/1986/07/why-good-managers-make-bad-ethical-choices
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino, F., Shu, L. L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). Nameless + harmless = blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P., & Smith, R. (2011). Criminal entrepreneurship, white-collar criminality, and neutralization theory. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 5(4), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506201111177334
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1086/269308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. C., & Dumas, A. (2009). Online consumer misbehaviour: An application of neutralization theory. Marketing Theory, 9(4), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593109346895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, J. (2008). Business ethics and moral motivation: A criminological perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9641-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinduja, S. (2007). Neutralization theory and online software piracy: An empirical analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(3), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-007-9143-5
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (2001). Intergroup relations: An overview. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Intergroup relations: Essential readings (pp. 1–17). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., & Imani, A. (2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, G. (2014). Social identity theory. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology(pp. 1781-1783). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_289
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsambekis, G. (2017). The populist surge in post‐democratic times: Theoretical and political challenges. The Political Quarterly, 88(2), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, B. (2019, September 24). Trump admits he delayed Ukraine aid but claims it was unrelated to Biden. CNN Politics. https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/24/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-aid
   Google Scholar
• Klockars, C. B. (1974). The professional fence. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1989). Content analysis. In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth, & L. Gross (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 1, pp. 403–407). Oxford University Press. http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/226
   Google Scholar
• Kvalnes, Ø., & Nordal, S. (2019). Normalization of questionable behavior: An ethical root of the financial crisis in Iceland. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(3), 761–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3803-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minor, W. W. (1981). Techniques of neutralization: A reconceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18(2), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242788101800206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. (2020, November 10). The abnormal presidency. The Washington Post Magazine. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/lifestyle/magazine/trump-presidential-norm-breaking-list/
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, J. (2019, December 18). Articles of impeachment against Donald John Trump. Congress of the United States of America, In the House of Representatives.https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hres755/BILLS-116hres755enr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norton, M. I., Monin, B., Cooper, J., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). Vicarious dissonance: Attitude change from the inconsistency of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, D., Jordan, J., & McCaul, M. T. (2019, December 2). Report of evidence in the democrats’ impeachment inquiry in the house of representatives: Republican staff. United States House of Representatives. https://republicans-intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/2019-12-02-report-of-evidence-in-the-democrats-impeachment-inquiry-in-the-house-of-representatives.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, N. L., Tibbetts, S. G., & Blankenship, M. B. (2005). Examining the role of differential association and techniques of neutralization in explaining corporate crime. Deviant Behavior, 26(2), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620590881930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polman, E., Pettit, N. C., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2013). Effects of wrongdoer status on moral licensing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randsley de Moura, G., & Abrams, D. (2013). Bribery, blackmail, and the double standard for leader transgressions. American Psychological Association, 17(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. W., & Buffalo, M. D. (1974). Neutralization techniques: Toward a simplified measurement scale. Pacific Sociological Review, 17(3), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388569
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (2008). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (3rd edition ed.). McGraw Hill. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/34945148
   Google Scholar
• Rotella, K. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2013). Body of guilt: Using embodied cognition to mitigate backlash to reminders of personal & ingroup wrongdoing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segers, G., Quinn, M., Watson, K., & Becket, S. (2019, December 03). House intelligence committee votes to adopt impeachment report. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/live-news/trump-impeachment-updates-house-intelligence-committee-report-today-2019-12-03/
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., Branscombe, N. R., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2012). Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 778–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2001). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Intergroup relations: Essential readings (pp. 94–109). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tauber, S., & van Zomeren, M. (2013). Outrage towards whom? Threats to moral group status impede striving to improve via out-group-directed outrage. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitell, S. J., & Grove, S. J. (1987). Marketing ethics and the techniques of neutralization. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(6), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. (2019, September 24). House launches formal impeachment inquiry into Trump. CNN Politics. https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-ukraine-09-24-2019/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, L. E., Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (2020). When sources honestly provide their biased opinion: Bias as a distinct source perception with independent effects on credibility and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(3), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219858654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamoon, S., & Curley, S. P. (2008). Ripped from the headlines: What can the popular press teach us about software piracy? Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9636-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar