Attitudes towards favoring the fall of Tall Poppies: The role of Social Dominance Orientation, Authoritarianism, Political Ideologies, and Self-Esteem

References

• Altemeyer, R. A. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, R. A. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J., Salmond, C., & Crampton, P. (2013). NZDep2013 index of deprivation. Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, P. E. (2006). The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Does, S., & Mentovich, A. (2016). Rooting for the top dog: How social dominance motives shape group preference in intergroup competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model: Dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durante, F., Tablante, C. B., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Poor but warm, rich but cold (and competent): Social classes in the Stereotype content model. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1989). Attitudes towards the high achiever: The fall of the tall poppy. Australian Journal of Psychology, 41(3), 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049538908260088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward high achievers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1–73). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60151-3
   Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1996a). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1996b). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: Research on tall poppies. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology, Vol. 8. The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (pp. 215–251). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1998a). Attitudes toward high achievers, self-esteem, and value priorities for Australian, American, and Canadian students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(6), 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198296005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1998b). Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social–cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 528–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (2006). Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 38–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600662321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T., & Adair, J. G. (1999). National identity, national favoritism, global self-esteem, tall poppy attitudes, and value priorities in Australian and Canadian samples. In J. C. Lasry, J. G. Adair, & K. Dion (Eds.), Latest contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 42–61). Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. R.(1993). Global self-esteem and attitudes toward the high achiever for Australian and Japanese students. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. R. (2014). Deservingness, liking relations, schadenfreude, and other discrete emotions in the context of the outcomes of plagiarism. Australian Journal of Psychology, 66(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T., & Sherman, R. (2002). Envy, resentment, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and undeserved achievement and subsequent failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616720202800708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T., Volkmer, R. E., & McKee, I. R. (1991). Attitudes towards high achievers in public life: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539108259105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T., Wenzel, M., & McKee, I. R. (2013). Integrating multiple perspectives on schadenfreude: The role of deservingness and emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 37(3), 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9331-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federico, C. M., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Racism, ideology, and affirmative action revisited: The antecedents and consequences of ‘principled objections’ to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmied, N., & Vandello, J. A. (2009). The advantage of disadvantage: Underdogs in the political Arena. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530802659810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadarics, M., & Kende, A. (2017). A closer look at intergroup threat within the dual process model framework: The mediating role of moral foundations. Psychological Thought, 10(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i1.210
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. T., Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2008). Envy, as predicted by the stereotype content model: A volatile ambivalence (R. Smith, Ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327953.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J., Marra, M., & Lazzaro-Salazar, M. (2016). Negotiating the tall poppy syndrome in New Zealand workplaces: Women leaders managing the challenge. Gender and Language, 11(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.31236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandler, C., Bell, E., & Riemann, R. (2016). The structure and sources of Right–wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Personality, 30(4), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Allison, S. T., Eylon, D., Goethals, G. R., Markus, M. J., Hindle, S. M., & McGuire, H. A. (2008). Rooting for (and then abandoning) the underdog. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(10), 2550–2573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, J. (2007). Tall Poppy syndrome: Implications for entrepreneurship in New Zealand. Journal of Management & Organization, 13(4), 366–382. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2007.13.4.366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavor, K. I., Louis, W. R., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). A bias-corrected exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of right-wing authoritarianism: Support for a three-factor structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, I. R., & Feather, N. T. (2008). Revenge, retribution, and values: Social attitudes and punitive sentencing. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0066-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, S., Hodge, K., Taylor, M., & Button, A. (2017). Tall poppy syndrome: Perceptions and experiences of elite New Zealand athletes. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(4), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2017.1280834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2021). Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. R package version 2.0.12. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, N. (1973). Authoritarian personality in contemporary perspective. In J. N. Knutson (Ed.),Handbook of political psychology (pp. 139–170). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinn, J. S., & Hayes, M. W. (2017). Replacing the moral foundations: An evolutionary-coalitional theory of liberal-conservative differences. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1043–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2008). Envy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327953.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Van De Ven, N., Hoogland, C. E., Smith, R. H., van Dijk, W. W., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2015). When envy leads to schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion, 29(2), 1007–1025. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.961903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2012). Appraisal patterns of envy and related emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 36(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9235-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandello, J. A., Goldschmied, N. P., & Richards, D. A. R. (2007). The appeal of the underdog. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(12), 1603–1616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207307488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. J., Bai, X., & Fiske, S. T. (2018). Admired rich or resented rich? How two cultures vary in envy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(7), 1114–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118774943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M., Kemper, C. J., & Kruyen, P. (2014). Short scales – Five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar