When a refusal turns into donation: the moderating effect of the initial position toward blood donation in the door-in-the-face effectiveness

References

• Aronson, E. (1992). The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0304_1
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1962). Performance expectancy as a determinant of actual performance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednall, T. C., Bove, L. L., Cheetham, A., & Murray, A. L. (2013). A systematic review and meta-analysis of antecedents of blood donation behavior and intentions. Social Science & Medicine, 96, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beerli-Palacio, A., & Martín-Santana, J. D. (2009). Model explaining the predisposition to donate blood from the social marketing perspective. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 14(3), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.352
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. A., Abrahams, M. F., Clark, C. L., & Schlatter, C. (1996). The door-in-the-face compliance strategy: An individual differences analysis of two models in an AIDS fundraising context. Communication Quarterly, 44(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379609370003
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, B. J., Bank, B. J., & Slavings, R. L. (1987). Norms, preferences, identities and retention decisions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(4), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J. M. (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calle, N., Plainfosse, C., Georget, P., & Senemeaud, C. (2015). La promesse post-don, un outil pour fidéliser? Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, 22(4), 211–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2015.06.285
   Google Scholar
• Callero, P. L., Howard, J. A., & Piliavin, J. A. (1987). Helping behavior as role behavior: Disclosing social structure and history in the analysis of prosocial action. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantarero, K., Gamian-Wilk, M., & Dolinski, D. (2016). Being inconsistent and compliant: The moderating role of the preference for consistency in the door-in-the-face technique. Personality and Individual Differences, 115(1), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, P. M., High, P. M., Schlumpf, K. S., Johnson, B. R., Mast, A. E., Rios, J. A., Simon, T. L., & Wilkinson, S. L.; Study-II (REDS-II), N. R. E. D. (2012). Donation return time at fixed and mobile donation sites. Transfusion, 52(1), 127–133 doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03235.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M.-H., Pitsillides, A., & Yang, Q. (2021). An evaluation of approaches for rare variant association analyses of binary traits in related samples. Scientific Reports, 11(3145), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82547-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Ascani, K. (1976). Test of a concession procedure for inducing verbal, behavioral, and further compliance with a request to give blood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(3), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.3.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Cacioppo, J. T., Bassett, R., & Miller, J. A. (1978). Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: Commitment then cost. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(5), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Vincent, J. E., Lewis, S. K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B. L. (1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, M., Godin, G., Sheeran, P., & Germain, M. (2013). Some feelings are more important: Cognitive attitudes, affective attitudes, anticipated affect, and blood donation. Health Psychology, 32(3), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. (1999). Unwanted consequences and the self: In search of the motivation for dissonance reduction. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive disonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. American Psychological Association. pp. 149-173.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 229–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60121-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Custer, B., Schlumpf, K. S., Wright, D., Simon, T. L., Wilkinson, S., Ness, P. M., & Study-II, N. R. E. D. (2011). Donor return after temporary deferral. Transfusion, 51(6), 1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02989.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (1991). The current status of research on sequential-request compliance techniques. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(3), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291173008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Hale, J. L. (1992). Prosocialness and sequential request compliance techniques: Limits to the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face? Communication Studies, 43(4), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979209368374
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Hunter, J. E., & Burgoon, M. (1984). Sequential-request persuasive strategies: Meta-analysis of foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face. Human Communication Research, 10(4), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00028.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFS. (2019a). Rapport d’activité: La vie de l’EFS en 2019 (pp. 1–48). https://ra.efs.sante.fr/
   Google Scholar
• EFS. (2019b, November 7). Les étudiants et le don de sang. Etablissement Français Du Sang. https://dondesang.efs.sante.fr/les-etudiants-et-le-don-de-sang
   Google Scholar
• EFS. (2021). Le don de sang, au cœur de l’économie du partage. Etablissement Français Du Sang. https://dondesang.efs.sante.fr/le-don-de-sang-au-coeur-de-leconomie-du-partage
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 204–243). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, T. H., Anker, A. E., & Aloe, A. M. (2012). The door-in-the-face persuasive message strategy: A meta-analysis of the first 35 years. Communication Monographs, 79(3), 316–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.697631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeley, T. H., Fico, A. E., Shaw, A. Z., Lee, S., & Griffin, D. J. (2016). Is the door-in-the-face a concession? Communication Quarterly, 65(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2016.1187186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fern, E. F., Monroe, K. B., & Avila, R. A. (1986). Effectiveness of multiple request strategies: A synthesis of research results. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378602300206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Peterson and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/80.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France, J. L., France, C. R., & Himawan, L. K. (2007). A path analysis of intention to redonate among experienced blood donors: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Transfusion, 47(6), 1006–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01236.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France, J. L., France, C. R., & Himawan, L. K. (2008). Re-donation intentions among experienced blood donors: Does gender make a difference? Transfusion and Apheresis Science, 38(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2008.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamian-Wilk, M., & Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K. (2009). The belief to have fixed or malleable traits and help giving: Implicit theories and sequential social influence techniques. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 40(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.2478/s10059-009-0009-z
   Google Scholar
• Georget, P., Calle, N., Plainfosse, C., & Sénémeaud, C. (2011, September 7). La fidélisation des donneurs de sang par courrier électronique: Pied dans la porte et étiquetage du dernier don [Communication orale]. 53ème Congrès National de la Société Française de Psychologie, Metz.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, M., Mcclenahan, C., Cairns, E., & Mallet, J. (2004). An application of the theory of planned behaviour to blood donation: The importance of self-efficacy. Health Education Research, 19(4), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, G., Conner, M., Sheeran, P., Bélanger-Gravel, A., & Germain, M. (2007). Determinants of repeated blood donation among new and experienced blood donors. Transfusion, 47(9), 1607–1615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01331.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, G., Vézina-Im, L.-A., Bélanger-Gravel, A., & Amireault, S. (2012). Efficacy of interventions promoting blood donation: A systematic review. Transfusion Medicine Reviews, 26(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, M., McVeigh, J. F., & Richterkessing, J. L. (1984). Door-in-the-face procedure: Reciprocal concession, perceptual contrast, or worthy person. Journal of Social Psychology, 123(2), 245–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guéguen, N. (2014). Door-in-the-face technique and delay to fulfill the final request: An evaluation with a request to give blood. The Journal of Psychology, 148(5), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2013.817963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, J. L., & Laliker, M. (1999). Explaining the door-in-the face: Is it really time to abandon reciprocal concessions? Communication Studies, 50(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979909388487
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, T. J., Dwyer, F. R., Greenwalt, T. J., & Coe, N. A. (1984). A comparison of two behavioral influence techniques for improving blood donor recruitment. Transfusion, 24(5), 399–403 doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.1984.24585017828.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, K. (2000). Embedded altruism: Blood collection regimes and the European Union’s donor population. American Journal of Sociology, 105(6), 1633–1657. https://doi.org/10.1086/210468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Heinze, G. (2006). A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data. Statistics in Medicine, 25(24), 4216–4226. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze, G., & Schemper, M. (2002). A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2409–2419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmens, K. P., Abraham, C., Ruiter, R. A., Veldhuizen, I. J., Dehing, C. J., Bos, A. E., & Schaalma, H. P. (2009). Modelling antecedents of blood donation motivation among non-donors of varying age and education. British Journal of Psychology, 100(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X310237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masser, B. M., Bednall, T. C., White, K. M., & Terry, D. (2012). Predicting the retention of first-time donors using an extended theory of planned behavior. Transfusion, 52(6), 1303–1310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03479.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masser, B. M., White, K. M., Hyde, M. K., & Terry, D. J. (2008). The psychology of blood donation: Current research and future directions. Transfusion Medicine Reviews, 22(3), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2008.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masser, B. M., White, K. M., Hyde, M. K., Terry, D. J., & Robinson, N. G. (2009). Predicting blood donation intentions and behavior among Australian blood donors: Testing an extended theory of planned behavior model. Transfusion, 49(2), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01981.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVittie, C., Harris, L., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2006). I intend to donate but … ”: Non-donors’ views of blood donation in the UK. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 11(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500500159455
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Millar, M. G. (2002). Effects of a guilt induction and guilt reduction on door in the face. Communication Research, 29(6), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002237831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. L. (1974). Facilitating compliance by manipulating the nature of the comparison: Relative cost vs. reciprocal concession. Proceedings of the Division of Personality and Society Psychology, 1(1), 160–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727400100155
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Figgé, M. (1997). A guilt-based explanation of the door-in-the-face influence strategy. Human Communication Research, 24(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00587.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Figgé, M. (1999). Guilt and expected guilt in the door-in-the-face technique. Communications Monographs, 66(4), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Hale, S. L. (1998). The door-in-the-face influence strategy: A random-effects meta-analytic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 21(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1998.11678947
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Hale, S. L. (2001). An odds-ratio-based meta-analysis of research on the door-in-the-face influence strategy. Communication Reports, 14(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210109367734
   Google Scholar
• Oswalt, R. M. (1977). A review of blood donor motivation and recruitment. Transfusion, 17(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.1977.17277151916.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendleton, M. G., & Batson, C. D. (1979). Self-presentation and the door-in-the-face technique for inducing compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5(1), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727900500117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piliavin, J. A. (1990). Why do they give the gift of life? A review of research on blood donors since 1977. Transfusion, 30(5), 444–459. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30590296381.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puhr, R., Heinze, G., Nold, M., Lusa, L., & Geroldinger, A. (2017). Firth’s logistic regression with rare events: Accurate effect estimates and predictions? Statistics in Medicine, 36(14), 2302–2317. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, M., & Wood, A. (2008). An investigation into blood donation intentions among non-donors. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.296
   Google Scholar
• Rise, J., Sheeran, P., & Hukkelberg, S. (2010). The role of self-identity in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(5), 1085–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00611.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. G., Masser, B. M., White, K. M., Hyde, M. K., & Terry, D. J. (2008). Predicting intentions to donate blood among nondonors in Australia: An extended theory of planned behavior. Transfusion, 48(12), 2559–2567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01904.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlumpf, K. S., Glynn, S. A., Schreiber, G. B., Wright, D. J., Randolph Steele, W., Tu, Y., Hermansen, S., Higgins, M. J., Garratty, G., & Murphy, E. L. (2008). Factors influencing donor return. Transfusion, 48(2), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01519.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénémeaud, C., Mange, J., Fointiat, V., & Somat, A. (2014). Being hypocritical disturbs some people more than others: How individual differences in preference for consistency moderate the behavioral effects of the induced-hypocrisy paradigm. Social Influence, 9(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2013.791235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénémeaud, C., Somat, A., Terrier, L., & Noël, Y. (2008). Porte au nez et préférence pour la consistance: Quand les sujets à forte préférence pour la consistance ne reproduisent pas les effets de l’influence sociale. L’Année Psychologique, 108(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503308001036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavitt, S., & Fazio, R. H. (1991). Effects of attribute salience on the consistency between attitudes and behavior predictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assesing the role of identification with “green consumerism.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(4), 388–399. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60229-4
   Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Lynch, M. (1993). Self-image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrier, L. (2007). Acceptabilité et inconfort psychologique: Une interprétation motivationnelle de l’effet de porte-au-nez [ Thèse de doctorat]. Université d’Aix-Marseille.
   Google Scholar
• Terrier, L., & Joule, R.-V. (2008). La procédure de porte-au-nez: Vers une interprétation motivationnelle. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 1 77 , 5–14. https://doi.org/10.3917/cips.077.0005
   Google Scholar
• Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, R., & Aronson, E. (1992). Taking a closer look: Reasserting the role of the self-concept in dissonance theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5), 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292185010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusing, K. J., & Dillard, J. P. (2000). The psychological reality of the door-in-the-face: It’s helping, not bargaining. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X00019001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidis, D., & Bran, A. (2019). Respectable challenges to respectable theory: Cognitive dissonance theory requires conceptualization clarification and operational tools. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wevers, A., Wigboldus, D. H., Van Baaren, R., & Veldhuizen, I. J. (2014). Return behavior of occasional and multigallon blood donors: The role of theory of planned behavior, self-identity, and organizational variables. Transfusion, 54(3pt2), 805–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.12309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. M., Poulsen, B. E., & Hyde, M. K. (2017). Identity and personality influences on donating money, time, and blood. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(2), 372–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016654280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (2016). Global status report on blood safety and availability (pp. 1–173). https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254987/9789241565431-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zuwerink, J. R., & Devine, P. G. (1996). Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion: It’s not just the thought that counts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 931–944. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar