The effectiveness of animal welfare-, environmental-, and health-focused video appeals on implicit and explicit wanting of meat and intentions to reduce meat consumption

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, R., Froggatt, A., & Wellesley, L. (2014). Livestock–climate change’s forgotten sector. Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Bechthold, A., Boeing, H., Schwedhelm, C., Hoffmann, G., Knüppel, S., Iqbal, K., De Henauw, S., Michels, N., Devleesschauwer, B., Schlesinger, S., & Schwingshackl, L. (2019). Food groups and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 59(7), 1071–1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1392288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2003). Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences, 26(9), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00233-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2008). Affective neuroscience of pleasure: Reward in humans and animals. Psychopharmacology, 199(3), 457–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1099-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blechert, J., Meule, A., Busch, N. A., & Ohla, K. (2014). Food-pics: An image database for experimental research on eating and appetite. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 617. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnet, C., Bouamra-Mechemache, Z., Réquillart, V., & Treich, N. (2020). Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare. Food Policy, 97, 101847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttlar, B., Rothe, A., Kleinert, S., Hahn, L., & Walther, E. (2021). Food for thought: investigating communication strategies to counteract moral disengagement regarding meat consumption. Environmental Communication, 15(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1791207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell-Arvai, V., Arvai, J., & Kalof, L. (2014). Motivating sustainable food choices: the role of nudges, value orientation, and information provision. Environment and Behavior, 46(4), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512469099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carfora, V., Catellani, P., Caso, D., & Conner, M. (2019a). How to reduce red and processed meat consumption by daily text messages targeting environment or health benefits. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carfora, V., Bertolotti, M., & Catellani, P. (2019b). Informational and emotional daily messages to reduce red and processed meat consumption. Appetite, 141, 104331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerrato, S., & Forestell, C. A. (2021). Meet your meat: the effect of imagined intergroup contact on wanting and liking of meat. Appetite, 168, 105656 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. S., Lau, R., Aune, D., Vieira, R., Greenwood, D. C., Kampman, E., & Norat, T. (2011). Red and processed meat and colorectal cancer incidence: Meta-analysis of prospective studies. PloS One, 6(6), e20456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çoker, E. N., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Fleshing out the theory of planned of behavior: meat consumption as an environmentally significant behavior. Current Psychology,41 , 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00593-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordts, A., Nitzko, S., & Spiller, A. (2014). Consumer response to negative information on meat consumption in Germany. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 17(1030), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.164599
   Google Scholar
• De Groeve, B., Bleys, B., & Hudders, L. (2019). Okay to promote eating less meat, but don’t be a cheat–the role of dietary identity, perceived inconsistency and inclusive language of an advocate in legitimizing meat reduction. Appetite, 138, 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg, M., Kovacheff, C., Teper, R., & Inbar, Y. (2019). Understanding the process of moralization: how eating meat becomes a moral issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(1), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, G., King, N., & Blundell, J. E. (2007). Is it possible to dissociate ‘liking’ and ‘wanting’ for foods in humans? A novel experimental procedure. Physiology & Behavior, 90(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson, G., King, N., & Blundell, J. (2008). The role of implicit wanting in relation to explicit liking and wanting for food: Implications for appetite control. Appetite, 50(1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing statistical assumptions. Statistical Associates Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Godfray, H. C. J., Aveyard, P., Garnett, T., Hall, J. W., Key, T. J., Lorimer, J., Pierrehumbert, R. T., Scarborough, P., Springmann, M., & Jebb, S. A. (2018). Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science, 361(6399). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T., & Abrahamse, W. (2017). Communicating the climate impacts of meat consumption: the effect of values and message framing. Global Environmental Change, 44, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27. 10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. C., Hartter, J., & Bell, E. (2019). Generation gaps in US public opinion on renewable energy and climate change. PloS one, 14(7), e0217608. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harguess, J. M., Crespo, N. C., & Hong, M. Y. (2020). Strategies to reduce meat consumption: A systematic literature review of experimental studies. Appetite, 144, 104478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, S., Collis, C., & Dedehayir, O. (2019). It’s not (just) about the f-ckin’ animals: how veganism is changing, and why that matters. In K. Kirkwood & M. Phillipov (Eds.), Alternative food politics: from the margins to the mainstream (1st ed., pp. 135–150). Critical Food Studies). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hoek, A. C., Pearson, D., James, S. W., Lawrence, M. A., & Friel, S. (2017). Shrinking the food-print: A qualitative study into consumer perceptions, experiences and attitudes towards healthy and environmentally friendly food behaviours. Appetite, 108, 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, K., & Hughes, K. (2018). Protecting the great barrier reef: Analysing the impact of a conservation documentary and post-viewing strategies on long-term conservation behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 24(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1303820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Bleidorn, W., Schwaba, T., & Chen, S. (2020). Health, environmental, and animal rights motives for vegetarian eating. PloS One, 15(4), e0230609. 10.1371/journal.pone.0230609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. 10.1080/13504620220145401.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V., McKay, T., & Ardern, C. I. (2015). Awareness and perception of plant-based diets for the treatment and management of type 2 diabetes in a community education clinic: A pilot study. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, 2015, 236234. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/236234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mallett, R. K. (2012). Eco-guilt motivates eco-friendly behavior. Ecopsychology, 4(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2012.0031
   Google Scholar
• Mallon, R. (2005). The deplorable standard of living faced by farmed animals in America’s meat industry and how to improve conditions by eliminating the corporate farm. Journal of Medicine & Law, 9, 389.
   Google Scholar
• Miele, M. (2010). Report concerning consumer perceptions and attitudes towards farm animal welfare. European Animal Welfare Platform: Brussels, Belgium, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. M., & Yang, J. Z. (2020). Using eco-guilt to motivate environmental behavior change. Environmental Communication, 14(4), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1692889
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, J. M. (2010). “An inconvenient truth” increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases. Environment and Behavior, 42(5), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509357696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oustric, P., Thivel, D., Dalton, M., Beaulieu, K., Gibbons, C., Hopkins, M., Blundell, G., & Finlayson, G. (2020). Measuring food preference and reward: application and cross-cultural adaptation of the leeds food preference questionnaire in human experimental research. Food Quality and Preference, 80, 103824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabian, S., Hudders, L., Poels, K., Stoffelen, F., & De Backer, C. J. (2020). Ninety minutes to reduce one’s intention to eat meat: A preliminary experimental investigation on the effect of watching the cowspiracy documentary on intention to reduce meat consumption. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00069
   Google Scholar
• Pan, A., Sun, Q., Bernstein, A. M., Schulze, M. B., Manson, J. E., Willett, W. C., & Hu, F. B. (2011). Red meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: 3 cohorts of US adults and an updated meta-analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 94(4), 1088–1096. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.018978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2021, May 28). Gen Z, millennials stand out for climate change activism, social media engagement with issue. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2021/05/26/gen-z-millennials-stand-out-for-climate-change-activism-social-media-engagement-with-issue/
   Google Scholar
• Pohjolainen, P., Vinnari, M., & Jokinen, P. (2015). Consumers’ perceived barriers to following a plant-based diet. British Food Journal, 117(3), 1150–1167. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2013-0252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochaska, & DiClemente, C. C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy, 19(3), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, J. (2017). Survey of US attitudes towards animal farming and animal-free food. Sentience Institute. https://www.sentienceinstitute.org/animal-farming-attitudessurvey-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H. (2020). Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat eaters reduce negative arousal from eating animals. Appetite, 146, 104511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H., & Rosenfeld, D. L. (2021). Meat‐related cognitive dissonance: the social psychology of eating animals. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(5), e12592. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouhani, M. H., Salehi‐Abargouei, A., Surkan, P. J., & Azadbakht, L. (2014). Is there a relationship between red or processed meat intake and obesity? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies. Obesity Reviews, 15(9), 740–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Sabate, R., & Sabaté, J. (2019). Consumer attitudes towards environmental concerns of meat consumption: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathopoulos, A. S. (2010). You are what your food eats: how regulation of factory farm conditions could improve human health and animal welfare alike. NYU Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 13 (2) , 407–444.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T. D., Castel, V., Rosales, M., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Food & Agriculture Org.
   Google Scholar
• Stoet, G. (2010). PsyToolkit - A software package for programming psychological experiments using linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, G. (2017). PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll-Kleemann, S., & Schmidt, U. J. (2017). Reducing meat consumption in developed and transition countries to counter climate change and biodiversity loss: A review of influence factors. Regional Environmental Change, 17(5), 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1057-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangney, J., & Dearing, R. (2002). Shame and guilt. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Eating green. consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite, 57(3), 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2020, December). Dietary guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025 (9th). Available at DietaryGuidelines.gov
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Lin, X., Ouyang, Y. Y., Liu, J., Zhao, G., Pan, A., & Hu, F. B. (2016). Red and processed meat consumption and mortality: Dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Public Health Nutrition, 19(5), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015002062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibel, C., Ohnmacht, T., Schaffner, D., & Kossmann, K. (2019). Reducing individual meat consumption: an integrated phase model approach. Food Quality and Preference, 73, 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58(3), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolk, A. (2017). Potential health hazards of eating red meat. Journal of Internal Medicine, 281(2), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.1254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolstenholme, E., Carfora, V., Catellani, P., Poortinga, W., & Whitmarsh, L. (2021). Explaining intention to reduce red and processed meat in the UK and Italy using the theory of planned behaviour, meat-eater identity, and the transtheoretical model. Appetite, 166, 105467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar