Meat and interpersonal motives: the case of self-enhancement

References

• Adams, C. J. (2020). The pornography of meat: New and updated edition. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280802613866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M. W., & Baines, S. (2002). Manipulating the symbolic meaning of meat to encourage greater acceptance of fruits and vegetables and less proclivity for red and white meats. Appetite, 38(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.2001.0474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M. W., Wilson, M., Hung, N. S., & Dunne, M. (2000). Values and beliefs of vegetarians and omnivores. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(4), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540009600481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, B., Costello, K., Loughnan, S., & Hodson, G. (2012). When closing the human–animal divide expands moral concern: The importance of framing. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(4), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611425106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, B., & Loughnan, S. (2017). Resolving the meat-paradox: A motivational account of morally troublesome behavior and its maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(3), 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316647562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilleri, L., Gill, P. R., & Jago, A. (2020). The role of moral disengagement and animal empathy in the meat paradox. Personality and Individual Differences, 164 , Article 110103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, C., & Rucker, D. D. (2022). Motives underlying human agency: How self-efficacy versus self-enhancement affect consumer behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46 , Article 101335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caviola, L., Everett, J. A. C., & Faber, N. S. (2019). The moral standing of animals: Towards a psychology of speciesism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(6), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, E. J. R., Ling, M., Kothe, E. J., Klas, A., & Richardson, B. (2019). Mitigation system threat partially mediates the effects of right‐wing ideologies on climate change beliefs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(6), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, K., & Hodson, G. (2010). Exploring the roots of dehumanization: The role of animal–human similarity in promoting immigrant humanization. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209347725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, K., & Hodson, G. (2014). Explaining dehumanization among children: The interspecies model of prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Corte, K., Buysse, A., Verhofstadt, L. L., Roeyers, H., Ponnet, K., & Davis, M. H. (2007). Measuring empathic tendencies: Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the interpersonal reactivity index. Psychologica Belgica, 47(4), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-47-4-235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhont, K., & Hodson, G. (2014). Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption? Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhont, K., Hodson, G., Costello, K., & MacInnis, C. C. (2014). Social dominance orientation connects prejudicial human–human and human–animal relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 61-62(105), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhont, K., Hodson, G., & Leite, A. C. (2016). Common ideological roots of speciesism and generalized ethnic prejudice: The social dominance human–animal relations model (SD–HARM). European Journal of Personality, 30(6), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetterman, A. K., Boyd, R. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2015). Power versus affiliation in political ideology: Robust linguistic evidence for distinct motivation-related signatures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(9), 1195–1206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215591960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graça, J., Calheiros, M. M., Oliveira, A., & Milfont, T. L. (2018). Why are women less likely to support animal exploitation than men? The mediating roles of social dominance orientation and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines, E. L., & Kray, L. J. (2005). Self‐power associations: The possession of power impacts women’s self‐concepts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(5), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. A. (1987). Affiliation motivation: People who need people … but in different ways. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 1008–1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, A. M. (1995). Empathy and belief in the mental experience of animals. Reviews and research reports. Anthrozoös, 8(3), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279395787156347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2018). Psychological implications of undervaluing animals: Dominance-based ideologies and systems of oppression. In A. Matsuoka & J. Sorenson (Eds.), Critical animal studies: Towards trans-species social justice (pp. 184–206). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kteily, N., Ho, A. K., & Sidanius, J. (2012). Hierarchy in the mind: The predictive power of social dominance orientation across social contexts and domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40(7), 812–825. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., Richter, I., Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Fischer, R. (2013). Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(9), 1127–1138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213490805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2014). The hierarchy enforcement hypothesis of environmental exploitation: A social dominance perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2016). Empathic and social dominance orientations help explain gender differences in environmentalism: A one-year Bayesian mediation analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motivaction. (2015). Quickscan 2015: Eetpatronen van verschillende sociale milieus, duurzaamheid en voedselverspilling. Onderzoek in opdracht van het Voedingscentrum. [ Quickscan 2015: Eating patterns in different social environments, sustainability and food waste. Research for Dutch national food centre]
   Google Scholar
• Norring, M., Wikman, I., Hokkanen, A.-H., Kujala, M. V., & Hänninen, L. (2014). Empathic veterinarians score cattle pain higher. The Veterinary Journal, 200(1), 186–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. S. (2000). Empathy with animals and with humans: Are they linked? Antrozoös, 13(4), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279300786999699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. M. (2010). The role of individual differences and involvement on attitude toward animal welfare [Master thesis, Kansas State University]. https://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/4235/GwendolenPowell2010.pdf;sequence=3
   Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., & Glasford, D. E. (2008). Ethnocentrism and the value of a human life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1411–1428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preylo, B. D., & Arikawa, H. (2008). Comparison of vegetarians and non-vegetarians on pet attitude and empathy. Anthrozoös, 21(4), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303708X371654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.1.3) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H., & Mican, F. (2014). Childhood pet ownership, attachment to pets, and subsequent meat avoidance. The mediating role of empathy toward animals. Appetite, 79, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.03.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. (2022). RStudio:IntegratedDevelopment Environment for R (Version 2022. 2.3.492)[Computer software]. http://www.rstudio.com
   Google Scholar
• Schönbrodt, F. D., & Gerstenberg, F. X. R. (2012). An IRT analyses of motive questionnaires: The unified motive scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 725–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, G. D., Lerner, J. S., Renshon, J., Ma-Kellams, C., & Joel, S. (2015). Perceiving others’ feelings: The importance of personality and social structure. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614567358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Ho, A. K., Sibley, C., & Duriez, B. (2013). You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spreng, R. N., McKinnon, M. C., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009). The Toronto empathy questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, S. K. (2021). Ideological bases of attitudes towards meat abstention: Vegetarianism as a threat to the cultural and economic status quo. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211020356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, N., & Signal, T. D. (2005). Empathy and attitudes to animals. Anthrozoös, 18(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279305785594342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templer, D. I., Connelly, H. J., Bassman, L., & Hart, J. (2006). Construction and validation of an animal-human continuity scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(7), 769–776. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.7.769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veser, P., Taylor, K., & Singer, S. (2015). Diet, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and predisposition to prejudice: Results of a German survey. British Food Journal, 117(7), 1949–1960. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2014-0409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiper, M. L. V., & Vonk, R. (2021). A communicational approach to enhance open-mindedness towards meat-refusers. Appetite, 167, 105602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. S., & Allen, M. W. (2007). Social psychological motivations and foundations of dietary preference. In L. W. Brown (Ed.), Psychology of motivation (pp. 65–82). Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. S., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Social dominance orientation and right‐wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 34(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00929.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1608–1647. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar