221
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Communicating beyond the information given can make the communicator’s attitudes toward a social group more extremeOpen DataOpen Materials

Pages 531-548 | Received 16 Aug 2021, Accepted 04 Oct 2022, Published online: 13 Oct 2022

References

  • Abeywickrama, R. S., & Laham, S. M. (2020). Meta-cognition predicts attitude depolarization and intentions to engage with the opposition following pro-attitudinal advocacy. Social Psychology, 51(6), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000424
  • Abeywickrama, R. S., Rhee, J. J., Crone, D. L., & Laham, S. M. (2020). Why moral advocacy leads to polarization and proselytization: The role of self-persuasion. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(2), 473–503. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1346
  • Altmire, J. (2017). Dead center: How political polarization divided America and what we can do about it. Sunbury Press.
  • Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(3), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.733
  • Aronson, E. (1999). The power of self-persuasion. American Psychologist, 54(11), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088188
  • Baldwin, A. S., Zhu, H., Rochefort, C., Marks, E., Fullington, H. M., Rodriguez, S. A., Kassa, S., & Tiro, J. A. (2021). Mechanisms of self-persuasion intervention for HPV vaccination: Testing memory and autonomous motivation. Health Psychology, 40(12), 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001075
  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
  • Brady, S. E., & Lord, C. G. (2013). When liars fool themselves: Motive to impress alters memory for one’s own past evaluative actions. Social Cognition, 31(5), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.5.599
  • Briñol, P., McCaslin, M. J., & Petty, R. E. (2012). Self-generated persuasion: Effects of the target and direction of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 925–940. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027231
  • Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2009). Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 20(1), 49–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280802643640
  • Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. W. W. Norton.
  • Carlston, D. E., & Skowronski, J. J. (1986). Trait memory and behavior memory: The effects of alternative pathways on impression judgment response times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.5
  • Carlston, D. E., & Skowronski, J. J. (1994). Savings in the relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 840–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.840
  • Decker, K. A., & Lord, C. G. (2022). Generalizing across behavior settings can make attitudes toward social groups more extreme in the absence of new information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2817
  • DeMarree, K. G., Clark, C. J., Wheeler, S. C., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2017). On the pursuit of desired attitudes: Wanting a different attitude affects information processing and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.003
  • DeMarree, K. G., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2007). Self-certainty: Parallels to attitude certainty. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 7(2), 159–188. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=56070204.
  • Dudukovic, N. M., Marsh, E. J., & Tversky, B. (2004). Telling a story or telling it straight: The effects of entertaining versus accurate retellings on memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.953
  • Gascó, M., Briñol, P., Santos, D., Petty, R. E., & Horcajo, J. (2018). Where did this thought come from? A self-validation analysis of the perceived origin of thoughts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(11), 1615–1628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218775696
  • Geschke, D., Lorenz, J., & Holtz, P. (2019). The triple-filter bubble: Using agent-based modeling to test a meta-theoretical framework for the emergence of filter bubbles and echo chambers. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2541
  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In, Cole , P, Morgan, J. L. (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, 3, 41–58. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd) ed.). The Guilford Press.
  • Higgins, E. T., & Rholes, W. S. (1978). ”Saying is believing”: Effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(4), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(78)
  • Hirst, W., & Echterhoff, G. (2012). Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100340
  • Hitlin, P. (2016). Research in the crowdsourcing age, a case study. Pew Research Center, 1–36. http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/07/11/research-in-the-crowdsourcing-age-a-case-study/
  • Johnson, M. K. (2006). Memory and reality. American Psychologist, 61(8), 760–771. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.760
  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Straus and Giroux.
  • Klein, E. (2020). Why we’re polarized. Avid Reader Press.
  • Kunda. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
  • Liu, J. H., & Latané, B. (1998). The catastrophic link between the importance and extremity of political attitudes. Political Behavior, 20(2), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024828729174
  • Lord, C. G., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Attitude representation theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 265–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60275-0
  • Lord, C. G., Paulson, R. M., Sia, T. L., Thomas, J. C., & Lepper, M. R. (2004). Houses built on shifting sand: Effects of exemplar stability on resistance to attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.733
  • Lu, T., Lord, C. G., & Yoke, K. (2015). Behind the stage of deliberate self-persuasion: When changes in valence of associations to an attitude object predict attitude change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(4), 767–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12111
  • Maio, G. R., & Thomas, G. (2007). The Epistemic-Teleologic Model of deliberate self-persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294589
  • Marsh, E. J., & Tversky, B. (2004). Spinning the stories of our lives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(5), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1001
  • McCarty, N. (2019). Polarization: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
  • Millar, M. G., & Tesser, A. (1986). Thought-induced attitude change: The effects of schema structure and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.259
  • Parsons, K., & Donehoo, P. N. (2019). Polarized: The collapse of truth, civility, and community in divided times and how we can find common ground. Prometheus Books.
  • Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 722–741. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.722
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). Academic Press.
  • Putnam, R. (2020). The upswing: How America came together a century ago and how we can do it again. Simon & Schuster.
  • Rocklage, M. D., & Fazio, R. H. (2015). The evaluative lexicon: Adjective use as a means of assessing and distinguishing attitude valence, extremity, and emotionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.005
  • Rocklage, M. D., Rucker, D. D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2018). The Evaluative Lexicon 2.0: The measurement of emotionality, extremity, and valence in language. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1327–1344. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0975-6
  • Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 880–892. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.880
  • Schneid, E. D., Carlston, D. E., & Skowronski, J. J. (2015). Spontaneous evaluative inferences and their relationship to spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 681–696. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039118
  • Schneider, D. J. (1973). Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 79(5), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034496
  • Schwarz, N. (2006). Attitude research: Between Ockham’s razor and the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 19–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/504124
  • Schwarz, N. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25(5), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.638
  • Schwarz, N., & Bohner, G. (2001). The construction of attitudes. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology, Vol. 1: Intraindividual processes (pp. 436–457). Blackwell.
  • Sia, T. L., Lord, C. G., Blessum, K. A., Ratcliff, C. D., & Lepper, M. R. (1997). Is a rose always a rose? The role of social category exemplar change in attitude stability and attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.501
  • Sides, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2015). Political polarization in American politics. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131
  • Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1992). Caught in the act: When impressions based on highly diagnostic behaviours are resistant to contradiction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(5), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220503
  • Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01
  • Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
  • Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96(1), 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.58
  • Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 191–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(197204)28:2<191::AID-JCLP2270280220>3.0.CO;2-G
  • Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz, (Vol. Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 289–338). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60010-6
  • Tesser, A., & Cowan, C. L. (1975). Thought and number of cognitions as determinants of attitude change. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 3(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1975.3.2.165
  • Tesser, A., & Cowan, C. L. (1977). Some attitudinal and cognitive consequences of thought. Journal of Research in Personality, 11(2), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(77)90018-6
  • Tesser, A., & Leone, C. (1977). Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(4), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90004-X
  • Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.299
  • Tversky, A., & Marsh, E. J. (2000). Biased retellings of events yield biased memories. Cognitive Psychology, 40(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.072
  • Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Antisocial media: How Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Valenti, A. C., & Tesser, A. (1981). On the mechanism of thought-induced attitude change. Social Behavior and Personality, 9(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1981.9.1.17
  • Vaynerchuk, G. (2013). Jab, jab, right hook: How to tell your story in a noisy social world. Harper Collins Publishers.
  • Wilson, T. D., & Hodges, S. D. (1992). Attitudes as temporary constructions. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 37–65). Erlbaum.
  • Wu, T. (2016). The attention merchants: The epic scramble to get inside our heads. Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Erlbaum.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.