References
- Barnard-Brak, L., Lan, W. Y., & Paton, V. O. (2010). Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 61–80.
- Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13.
- Cho, M.-H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: The role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students' learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99.
- Cigdem, H., & Yildirim, O. G. (2014). Effects of students' characteristics on online learning readiness: A vocational college example. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 80–93.
- Hauser, R., Paul, R., & Bradley, J. (2012). Computer self-efficacy, anxiety, and learning in online versus face to face medium. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11, 141–154.
- Jain, P., Jain, S., & Jain, S. (2011). Interactions among online learners: A quantitative interdisciplinary study. Education, 131(3), 538–544.
- Johnson, G. M. (2015). On-campus and fully-online university students: Comparing demographics, digital technology use and learning characteristics. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 12(1).
- Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23.
- Kelly, R. (2014, January 7). Creating a sense of instructor presence in the online classroom. Faculty Focus. Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/creating-a-sense-of-instructor-presence-in-the-online-classroom
- Kirmizi, Ö. (2015). The influence of learner readiness on student satisfaction and academic achievement in an online program at higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 133–142.
- Klaus, T., & Changchit, C. (2014). Environmental factors of distance learning: An exploratory study. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 10(1), 14–24.
- Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50.
- Mason, J. A., Helton, L. R., & Dziegielewski, S. (2010). Psychosocial environmental relationships among MSW students in distance learning and traditional classrooms. Journal of Social Service Research, 36(3), 230–247.
- McCormick, N. J., Clark, L. M., & Raines, J. M. (2015). Engaging students in critical thinking and problem solving: A brief review of the literature. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(4), 100–113.
- Miller, S. L. (2015). Teaching an online pedagogy MOOC. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Technology, 11(1), 87–102.
- Moke, C., & Wright, L. (2017). Technology that improves instructor presence in online courses. Online Learning Consortium. Retrieved from https://secure.onlinelearningconsortium.org/effective_practices/technology-improves-instructor-presence-online-courses
- Naidu, S. (2014). In search of “what works” in online and distance education. Distance Education, 35(1), 1–3.
- Northcote, M., & Gosselin, K. P. (2016). Handbook of research on humanizing the distance learning experience. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
- Stoessel, K., Ihme, T. A., Barbarino, M.-L., Fisseler, B., & Stürmer, S. (2015). Sociodemographic diversity and distance education: Who drops out from academic programs and why? Research in Higher Education, 56(3), 228–246.
- Taipjutorus, W., Hansen, S., & Brown, M. (2012). Investigating a relationship between learner control and self-efficacy in an online learning environment. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 16(1), 56–69.
- Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Computers & Education, 75, 112–126.