Failing in Creativity: The Problem of Policy and Practice in Australia and the United States

References

• Anderson, D. R. (2002). Creative teachers: Risk, responsibility, and love. journal of Education, 183(1), 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. (2014, March 19). The new national arts curriculum could make for better schools. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/the-new-national-arts-curriculum-could-make-for-better-schools-24537
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2018). F-10 curriculum (Version 8.3). Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum
   Google Scholar
• Blicblau, A. S., & Steiner, J. M. (1998). Fostering creativity through engineering projects. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(1), 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Casminaty, T., & Henderson, M. (2016). Risky business: ICT and creativity. In S. Prestridge & P. Albion (Eds.), Australian Council for Computers in Education 2016 conference refereed proceedings (pp. 16–22). Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (2013). The CAEP standards. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/standards/introduction
   Google Scholar
• Croft, S. J., Roberts, M. A., & Stenhouse, V. L. (2015). The perfect storm of education reform: High-stakes testing and teacher evaluation. Social Justice, 42(1), 70–92.
   Google Scholar
• Dewett, T. (2007). Linking intrinsic motivation, risk taking, and employee creativity in an R&D environment. R&D Management, 37(3), 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditchburn, G. (2012). The Australian curriculum: Finding the hidden narrative? Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 347–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditchburn, G. (2015). The Australian curriculum: History—the challenges of a thin curriculum? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(1), 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Florida State University. (2012). Collaborate, plan, align, learn, motivate, and share (CPALMS). Retrieved from http://www.cpalms.org/Downloads.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, D., & Mishra, P. (2015). We teach who we are: Creativity in the lives and practices of accomplished teachers. Teachers College Record, 117(7), 1–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, T., & Kelley, D. (2012). Reclaim your creative confidence. Harvard Business Review, 90(12), 115–118, 135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konner, M. (2010). The evolution of childhood: Relationships, emotion, mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010a). Common Core State Standards for English language arts. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010b). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, N. (1998). How hardwired is human behavior? Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 134–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2007). Framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
   Google Scholar
• Perreault, G. (2000). The classroom impact of high-stress testing. Education, 120(4), 705–710.
   Google Scholar
• Rattan, A., Savani, K., Chugh, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Leveraging mindsets to promote academic achievement: Policy recommendations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 721–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2016). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. (2015). A call to action: The challenges of creative teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 117(10), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sforza, D., Tienken C. H., & Kim, E. (2016). A comparison of higher order thinking between the Common Core State Standards and the 2009 New Jersey Content Standards in high school. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 12(4), 4–30.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S., & Henriksen, D. (2016). Fail again, fail better: Embracing failure as a paradigm for creative learning in the arts. Art Education, 69(2), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Starko, A. J. (2010). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Teaching for creativity: The sounds of silence. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 115–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinzimmer, L., & McConoughey, J. (2012, September 7). Failure is the only option, if success is the end goal. Fast Company. Retrieved from: http://www.fastcompany.com/3001086/failure-only-option-if-success-end-goal
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S. D. (2002). Self-esteem and the self-censorship of creative ideas. Personnel Review, 31(4), 495–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2012). World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar