References
- Ball, K. “Workplace Surveillance: An Overview.” Labor History 51, no. 1 (2010): 87–106. doi:10.1080/00236561003654776.
- Berndtsson, J., and M. Stern. “Private Security and the Public-Private Divide: Contested Lines of Distinction and Modes of Governance in the Stockholm-Arlanda Security Assemblage.” International Political Sociology 5, no. 4 (2011): 408–425. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00142.x.
- Cantrell, N. “West Virginia's Chemical Industry.” West Virginia Historical Society XVIII, no. 2 (2004): 1–15.
- Capozzola, C. “The Only Badge Needed is Your Patriotic Fervor: Vigilance, Coercion, and the Law in World War I America.” Journal of American History 88, no. 4 (2002): 1354–1382. doi:10.2307/2700601.
- Challinger, D. “Corporate Security: A Cost or Contributor to the Bottom Line.” In Handbook of Security, edited by M. Gill, 586–609. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006.
- Cohen, M. “‘The Ku Klux Government’: Vigilantism, Lynching, and the Repression of the IWW.” Journal for the Study of Radicalism 1, no. 1 (2007): 31–56. doi:10.1353/jsr.2008.0015.
- Coopey, R., and A. McKinlay. “Power Without Knowledge? Foucault and Fordism, c.1900–50.” Labor History 51, no. 1 (2010): 107–125. doi:10.1080/00236561003654800.
- Cubbage, C., and D. Brooks. Corporate Security in the Asia-Pacific Region: Crisis, Crime, and Misconduct. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2013.
- Davis, M., R. Lundman, and R. Martinez, Jr. “Private Corporate Justice: Store Police, Shoplifters, and Civil Recovery.” Social Problems 38, no. 3 (1991): 395–411. doi:10.2307/800606.
- Dinius, O., and A. Vergara, eds. Company Towns in the Americas: Landscape, Power, and Working-Class Communities. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2011.
- Donner, F. The Age of Surveillance: The Aims and Methods of America's Political Intelligence System. New York: Alfred Knoff, 1980.
- Draper, H. Private Police. Sussex: Harvester Press, 1978.
- Dubofsky, M. We Shall be All: A History of the Industrial Workers of the World. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1969.
- Dunn, R. W. The Americanization of Labor: The Employers' Offensive Against the Trade Unions. New York: International Publishers Co, 1927.
- Earl, J. “Tanks, Tear Gas, and Taxes: Toward a Theory of Movement Repression.” Sociological Theory 21, no. 1 (2003): 44–68. doi:10.1111/1467-9558.00175.
- Gilbert, J. World War I and the Origins of U.S. Military Intelligence. Toronto: Scarecrow Press, 2012.
- Goldstein, R. J. Political Repression in Modern America from 1870 to 1976. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1870.
- Henry, S. “Private Justice and the Policing of Labour: The Dialectics of Industrial Discipline.” In Private Policing, edited by C. Shearing and P. Stenning, 45–71. London: Sage, 1987.
- McCartin, J. Labor's Great War: The Struggle for Industrial Democracy and the Origins of Modern American Labor Relations, 1912–1921. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997.
- Montgomery, D. The Fall of the House of Labor: The Workplace, the State, and American Labor Activism, 1865–1925. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
- Nalla, M. “Assessing Corporate Security Departments' Internal Relationships and Linkages with Other Business Functions.” Journal of Security Education 1, no. 1 (2004): 29–40. doi:10.1300/J460v01n01_04.
- O'Reilly, C. “The Transnational Security Consultancy Industry: A Case of State–Corporate Symbiosis.” Theoretical Criminology 14, no. 2 (2010): 183–210. doi:10.1177/1362480609355702.
- O'Reilly, C., and G. Ellison. “Eye Spy Private High: Re-conceptualizing High Policing Theory.” British Journal of Criminology 46, no. 4 (2007): 641–660. doi:10.1093/bjc/azi090.
- Parfitt, S. “Democracies in Conflict: Union Democracy, Industrial Democracy, and Machinists in Bridgeport, Connecticut, during the First World War.” Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, no. 34 (2013): 83–110. doi:10.3828/hsir.2013.34.4.
- Patmore, G. “Employee Representation Plans in the United States, Canada, and Australia: An Employer Response to Workplace Democracy.” Labor: Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas 3, no. 2 (2006): 41–65. doi:10.1215/15476715-2005-009.
- Petersen, K. “The Politics of Corporate Security and the Translation of National Security.” In Corporate Security in the 21st Century: Theory and Practice in International Perspective, edited by Kevin Walby and Randy Lippert, 78–96. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
- Rosswurm, S., and T. Gilpin. “The FBI and the Farm Equipment Workers: FBI Surveillance Records as a Source for CIO Union History.” Labor History 27, no. 4 (1986): 485–505. doi:10.1080/00236568608584852.
- Rowe, D. “The Tragedy of Liberalism How Globalization Caused the First World War.” Security Studies 14, no. 3 (2005): 407–447. doi:10.1080/09636410500323153.
- Spitzer, S., and A. Scull. “Privatization and Capitalist Development: The Case of the Private Police.” Social Problems 25, no. 1 (1977): 18–29. doi:10.2307/800464.
- Tucker, J. “Employee Theft as Social Control.” Deviant Behavior 10, no. 4 (1989): 319–334. doi:10.1080/01639625.1989.9967820.
- Vitale, P. “Wages of War: Manufacturing Nationalism during World War II.” Antipode 43, no. 3 (2011): 783–819. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00824.x.
- Wagner, T., and P. Obermiller. “A Double-Edged Sword: Social Control in Appalachian Company Towns.” In Engineering Earth: The Impacts of Megaengineering Projects Volume 3, edited by S. Brunn, 1917–1935. London: Springer, 2011.
- Weiss, R. “Corporate Security at Ford Motor Company: From the Great War to the Cold War.” In Corporate Security in the 21st Century: Theory and Practice in International Perspective, edited by Kevin Walby and Randy Lippert, 17–38. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
- Weiss, R. “Private Detective Agencies and Labour Discipline in the United States, 1855–1946.” The Historical Journal 29, no. 1 (1986): 87–107. doi:10.1017/S0018246X0001863X.
- White, N. Company Towns: Corporate Order and Community. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2012.
- White, A. “Corporate Security at Ford Motor Company: From the Great War to the Cold War.” In Corporate Security in the 21st Century: Theory and Practice in International Perspective, edited by Kevin Walby and Randy Lippert, 39–55. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
- Williams, D. Call in Pinkerton's: American Detectives at Work for Canada. Toronto: Dundurn Press, 1998.
- Williams, J. “The Private Eyes of Corporate Culture: The Forensic Accounting and Corporate Investigation Industry and the Production of Corporate Financial Security.” In Corporate Security in the 21st Century: Theory and Practice in International Perspective, edited by Kevin Walby and Randy Lippert, 56–77. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
Archival Records
- Attention Mr. Flynn, Chief Clerk. April 20, 1918. Subject: Plant Protection Passes.
- Banning intelligence synopsis, Plant Protection. No date.
- Communiqué, no title, February 5, 1918. No sender and no recipient.
- Communiqué, Subject: IWW Anarchists, Location: Los Angeles, Agent No. 102. December 26th 1917.
- Interior Organization, February 5, 1918. Sender and receiver unknown.
- Edmund Leigh, Military Intelligence, Plant Protection, to Chief, Military Intelligence Branch Executive Board, subject IWW Activities – Coast. June 21 1918.
- Military Intelligence – Plant Protection. Chief, Military Intelligence Branch, Executive Division. Subject: Secret Supplementary Report on Interior Organization; Activities of the Plant Protection Section. April 30, 1918.
- Military Intelligence – Plant Protection. George Black, Agent in Charge, Detroit, Mich. January 24, 1918. Subject: An Ordinance for the City of Detroit, Mich. Licensing and Regulating Private Detectives and Watchmen.
- Notice regarding “Racial Classification of Foreign-Born Workers.” September 4, 1918. From the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Education to Mr. Edmund Leigh of Plant Protection.
- Plant Protection Section, Chief Signal Officer of the Army – Attention Mr. Flynn, Chief Clerk. April 20, 1918. Subject: Plant Protection Passes.
- US Senate report, cited in Weiss 2014, U.S. Senate. Committee on Labor and Education. 1893. “Investigation in Relation to the Employment for Private Purposes of Armed Bodies of Men, or Detectives, in Connection With Differences Between Workmen and Employers.” Report No.1280, 52d Cong. 2nd Sess. Washington: Government printing Office.
- War Department, Office of the Chief Signal Officer, Washington, February 27, 1918. From Military Intelligence – Plant Protection. To Chief Signal Officer of the Army. Subject: Activities, Military Intelligence, Plant Protection.
- War Department, Plant Protection Section, From J.F. Grant to George Black, Agent in Charge, District No. 6, July 5, 1918. Subject: Identification and Interior Organization.