References
- National Conference ofCatholic Bishops, Ethical and Religious Directivesfor Catholic Health Care Services (Washington: USCC, 1995).
- Kevin Wildes, “A Memo from the Central Office: The ’ Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Servicesx2019;,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (1995) 133-140.
- John Gallagher, “The Ecclesiology of the U.S. Bishops' 1994 Health Care Directives,” Reviewfor Religious 55 (1996) 230-248.
- For further insight, he refers us to Yves Congar, Lay People in the Church, trans. Donald Attwater (London: Bloomsbury Publishing Co., 1957); Philip Murnion, “The Next Steps for the Laity,” Origins 25 .2 (1995) 28-32; Ladislas Orsy, “Structures for the Vision,” America 173 (7 October 1995) 10-15.
- From Avery Dulles, Models ofthe Church (New York: Doubleday, 1974).
- On advanced directives see my “Living Wills” The Tablet (September 17, 1994) 1157-1159.
- See Veritatis Splendor 31-35,59-65.
- See the important essays, John T. Noonan, “Development in Moral Doctrine,” and Thomas Kopfensteiner, “Science, Metaphor and Moral Casuistry,” in The Text of Casuistry James Keenan and Thomas Shannon, eds. (Washington, D. c.:Georgetown UP, 1995) 198-204 and 207-220, respectively.
- On the question ofthe principle and ectopic pregnancy, see my “The Function of the Principle ofDouble Effect” Theological Studies 54 (1993) 294-315.
- See, for instance, John Tuohey, “The Implications of the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services on the Clinical Practice of Resolving Ectopic Pregnancies,” Louvain Studies 20 (1995) 41-57.