References
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 541 1651–2
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 607 1652–3
- 1647 . The First Dutch War This was not, as stated in the Index to a hired merchantman, but a regular man-of-war dating from or earlier
- Penn was ashore on the day of the action
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 522 1651–2
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 177 1651–2, pp., 529, 563, etc
- Ibid. 175
- The First Dutch War 81 III, p., or Cal. S.P. Dom. 1651–2, p. 511
- The First Dutch War 135 – 6 . II
- Ibid. 134
- Ibid. 238 – 40 .
- Ibid. 241 – 4 .
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 411 1651–2, pp., 529, 531
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 531 1652–3, p.; 1653–4, p. 447. He may perhaps have been in the Dolphin at Dungeness (ibid. p. 620) but that ship was certainly not at the Kentish Knock
- The First Dutch War 315 – 6 . III
- The First Dutch War 81 III
- Ibid. 91 – 5 . 364, 406; and Cal. S.P. Dom. 1651–2, p. 541
- The First Dutch War 72 III, pp., 115; Cal. S.P. Dom. 1651–2, pp. 537, 540, 541
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 535 1651–2
- Vanguard 538 Mildmay sent in an account of the damage done to the in “the late engagement” (ibid. p.). This is calendared under 16 November, but must be wrongly dated, since Mildmay was certainly in the Nonsuch at the Kentish Knock
- Dolphin 620 A document calendared under 15 November mentions the Capt. William Badiley, as having been in “the fight—near the Downs” (Cal. S.P. Dom. 1651–2, p.). This must also be wrongly dated, since it is certain that the Dolphin was not at the Kentish Knock
- The First Dutch War 85 IV, p. She was perhaps in time for the second or third day's fighting
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 494 1652–3, pp., 537
- Ibid. 614
- The First Dutch War 137 IV, pp., 279; Cal. S.P. Dom. 1652–3, p. 530
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 598 1652–3
- Ibid. 573 604, 605
- Cignet 521 Her former commander Phillip Holland is described in January as “late of the” (Cal. S.P. Dom. 1652–3, p.)
- Cal. S. P. Dom. 189 1652–3
- Wapen en Blydschap For instance,—”Arms (military or heraldic) and Joy”—for Ann and Joyce.
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 356 1652–3, pp., 359, 360, 373, 383. A document of 14 June mentions the lieutenant of the Advice as “slain in the late engagement”, but this probably refers to Portland. A similar mention of the Charles (ibid. p. 612), though dated 22 June, evidently refers to Portland, since the Charles was paid off in April (ibid. p. 276)
- Ibid. 593
- The First Dutch War 64 v
- Hist. MSS. Com. gth Report 442 Part II, p., or Letters of Robert Blake, p. 216
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 392 Not Robert Kirby (see 1652–3, p.)
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 561 1652–3
- 609 Not Francis Park (see ibid. p.)
- Ibid. 492 1653–4
- Lightfoot , Luke . 412 whom Dr Ballhausen wishes to substitute, was really Clerk of the Check (ibid. 1652–3, p.)
- Cal. S.P. Dom. Or Ranse (1653–4, PP.32, 544)
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 468 1653–4
- Ibid. 466 482
- The First Dutch War 345 v, pp., 399
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 5 1653–4, pp., 464
- The First Dutch War 347 v
- Ibid. 399
- Ibid. 39 Cal. S.P. Dom. 1653–4, p. 483
- Cal. S.P. Dom. 468 1653–4, pp., 474, etc
- Ibid. 471 477
- Ibid. 32
- Ibid. 472 The First Dutch War, vol. v, p. 343
- The First Dutch War 344 v, pp., 345, 405 and Cal. S.P. Dom. 1653–4, pp. 466, 484
- Life of Penn Vol. 1 , 505 ; The First Dutch War, vol. v, pp. 353, 379, 396, 424; Cal. S.P. Dom. 1653–4, pp. 15, 20, 60, 67, 69, 72, 465, 468, 471, 481
- The First Dutch War 273 v, pp., 415; Cal. S. P. Dom. 1653–4, pp. 463, 465, 468, 476, 497