Parliamentary Politics and the Singapore Base: A surplus of opinions and few answers, 1918–29

References

• 1980 . 20th Century British History , 14 : 138 – 64 . For additional background on this subject see, K. Neilson, ‘Defence and diplomacy: the British Foreign Office and Singapore, 1939–1940’,:2 (2003),; B. Ferrell, S. Hunter, (eds), Sixty Years On: the fall of Singapore Revisited (Singapore, 2002); Ikeda Kiyoshi, ‘The Road to Singapore: Japan's view of Britain, 1922–1941’, in T. G. Fish and P. Lowe (eds), Conflict and Amity in East Asia: Essays in honour of Ian Nish (London, 1992), 30–46; J. Neidpath, The Singapore Naval Base and the Defence of Britain's Eastern Empire (Oxford, 1981); I. Hamill, ‘Winston Churchill and the Singapore Naval Base, 1924–1929’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 11:2(), 277–86; and W. D. McIntyre, The Rise and Fall of the Singapore Naval Base, 1919–1942 (Oxford, 1979)
   Google Scholar
• 1902 . The Rise and Fall of the Singapore Naval Base The National Archives of England and Wales, Kew, (hereafter, NA), NA ADM 116/1770, Memos, 17 May 1918 and 27 Jun. 1918; McIntyre, 3; D. C. Gordon, ‘The Admiralty and Dominion Navies,–1924’, The Journal of Modern History 33:4 (1961), 408
   Google Scholar
• NA ADM 116/1882, Memorandum to Long, 25 Feb. 1919. The Admiralty viewed the allocated warships as the minimum needed to maintain Britain's naval presence in the Far East and protect its assets
   Google Scholar
• May 1921 . The Times May , NA ADM 116/1810, Proposed Gift of Destroyers and Submarines to the Australian Navy, Jan. 1919;, 22, ‘Hughes Declaration’
   Google Scholar
• Feb. 1919 . Feb. , NA ADM 116/1882, W. F. Massey to Long, 10
   Google Scholar
• Temple Patterson , A. 1968 . The Jellicoe Papers: Selections from the private and official correspondence of Admiral of the Fleet Admiral Earl Jellicoe vol. II, 1916–1935 (London), 350. Papers Relating to the Empire Mission, 1919–20
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre . December 1919 . The Rise and Fall of the Singapore Naval Base December , 22; The Times, 12, ‘Sea Power in the Pacific-Lord Jellicoe's Report’, by Our Sydney Correspondent
   Google Scholar
• Patterson , Temple . The Jellicoe Papers vol. II, 326. Papers Relating to the Empire Mission 1919–20
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 324
   Google Scholar
• Oct. 1919 . Oct. , NA ADM 1/8571, Naval Situation in the Far East, 21
   Google Scholar
• Medlicott , W. N. 1968 . British Foreign Policy since Versailles 62 London
   Google Scholar
• Ranft , B. A. 1995 . “ ‘Admiral David Earl Beatty’ ” . In The First Sea Lords from Fisher to Mountbatten Edited by: Murfett , M. H. London in (), 129
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers , W. S. 1959 . Full Cycle: The Biography of Admiral Sir Bertram Home Ramsay 27 – 8 . London Rear-Admiral
   Google Scholar
• Neidpath . The Singapore Naval Base 56
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 56
   Google Scholar
• Oct. 1921 . Parliamentary Debates Vol. 147 , Oct. , British Parliamentary Papers, Commons, vol., 27, col. 1066
   Google Scholar
• Vol. 126 , Ibid., Commons, vol., 18 March 1920, col. 2467
   Google Scholar
• Neidpath . The Singapore Naval Base 56
   Google Scholar
• Ranft . May 1921 . Beatty Papers May , Vol. II, 363–6, Naval Staff Notes, 5 [BTY/8/5/2]
   Google Scholar
• Feb. 1924 . Feb. , NA CAB 27/236, Committee on Replacement of Fleet Units other than Capital Ships and Singapore Base, 22
   Google Scholar
• The Empire at Bay: The Leo Amery diaries Vol. 1 , 312 Churchill College, Cambridge, Amery MSS, AMEL/7/16, 14 Nov. 1922; J. Barnes and D. Nicholson, (eds), vol
   Google Scholar
• NA ADM 167/76, Board Minutes no. 1690, 3 Aug. 1923; ADM 167/68, Board Memorandum—Singapore Naval Base, 9 Jul. 1923; Amery MSS, AMEL/7/17, 12 May 1923
   Google Scholar
• Ranft . Feb. 1924 . Beatty Papers Feb. , Vol. II, Clynes Committee Minutes, 27 [BTY/8/5/15]
   Google Scholar
• Ranft . May 1924 . Beatty Papers May , Vol. II, Clynes Committee Minutes, 3 [BTY/8/5/16]; McIntyre, Rise and Fall of the Singapore Base, 40–1
   Google Scholar
• Feb. 1922 . Feb. , Ibid., Notes by the Naval Staff, 28 Apr. 1924 [BTY/8/5/22]. The Washington Naval Treaty was signed on 6 and imposed limits on capital warship building on the five signatories, the USA, the British Empire, the Empire of Japan, the French Third Republic and the Kingdom of Italy
   Google Scholar
• Halpern , P. G. 1980 . The Keyes Papers: Selections from the private and official correspondence of Admiral of the Fleet Baron Keyes of Zeebrugge vol. II, 1919–1938 (London), 96. Letter from Keyes to Richmond, Admiralty, S.W. 19 May 1924, Richmond MSS [RIC/7/3], Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives and British Library, Department of Manuscripts Collection, London
   Google Scholar
• Mar. 1924 . The Times Mar. , 2 ‘Singapore Base’; 16 Mar. 1924, ‘Political Notes’; Daily Telegraph, 1 Mar. 1924, ‘The Singapore Scheme’; 7 Mar. 1924, ‘Singapore Naval Base’ by our Parliamentary Correspondent; 14 Mar. 1924, ‘Singapore Base’ by Lord Balfour; 18 March 1923, ‘Singapore Base-Project Abandoned’
   Google Scholar
• Mar. 1924 . Mar. , NA J. Ramsay MacDonald Papers, PRO/30/69/748, Hankey to MacDonald (SECRET), 10
   Google Scholar
• 1924 . J. Ramsay MacDonald MSS, PRO/30/69/748, Naval Policy on the Singapore Base
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Debates Vol. 161 , Commons, vol., 12 Mar. 1923, col. 1098–9
   Google Scholar
• Vol. 162 , Ibid., Commons, Vol., 25 Apr. 1923, col. 432
   Google Scholar
• Vol. 166 , Ibid., Commons, Vol., 4 Jul. 1923, col. 416. Amery answered Kenworthy stating that the government used the costing models of the Rosyth Base, which had two dry docks, a tidal basin and a depot for destroyers. Total cost £11,335,207; vol. 166, 12 Jul. 1923, col. 1560–1
   Google Scholar
• Apr. 1924 . Apr. , Amery MSS, AMEL/7/16, 11
   Google Scholar
• Mar. 1923 . Parliamentary Debates Vol. 162 , Mar. , Commons, vol., 28, col. 475, 533–4; vol. 163, 9 May 1923, col. 2336–7; vol. 164, 5 Jun. 1923, col. 1995–6; vol. 165, 27 Jun. 1923, col. 294, 2330; vol. 167, 2 Aug. 1923, col. 1722
   Google Scholar
• May 1923 . Vol. 163 , May , Ibid., Commons, vol., 1, col. 1243–58; vol. 166, 19 Jul. 1923, col. 2563–6, 25815, 2602–6
   Google Scholar
• 1923 . Vol. 166 , Ibid., Commons, vol., 19 Jul., col. 2573–5, 2613–21
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Debates Vol. 161 , Amery MSS, AMEL/7/17, 1 May 1923;, Commons, vol., 22 Mar. 1923, col. 2854; vol. 163, 1 May 1923, col. 1247–51
   Google Scholar
• May 1923 . Parliamentary Debates Vol. 163 , May , Commons, vol., 1, col. 1235–7
   Google Scholar
• 1923 . Vol. 166 , Ibid., Commons, vol., 19 Jul., col. 2559–63
   Google Scholar
• 1923 . Amery MSS, AMEL/7/17, 19 Jul
   Google Scholar
• May 1923 . Parliamentary Debates Vol. 163 , May , Commons, vol., I, col. 1227–30
   Google Scholar
• Lyman , R. W. 1957 . The First Labour Government, 1924 London 213; A. Morgan, J. Ramsay MacDonald, (London, 1987), 104; B. McL. Ranft, ‘Admiral Sir David Beatty’, ed. by Malcolm H. Murfett, The First Sea Lords: From Fisher to Mountbatten (London: Praeger Publishers, 1995), 136
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre . The Rise and Fall of the Singapore Naval Base 42
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Debates Vol. 171 , Amery MSS, AMEL/7/18, 18 Mar. 1924;, Commons, vol., 18 Mar. 1924, col. 316–25; Ranft, Beatty Papers vol. II, 362
   Google Scholar
• It should be noted that there are no references within the 1921, 1922 or 1923 Labour Party Election Manifestos advocating the cancellation of funds to the Singapore Base. British Library, London, Labour Party Election Manifestos, 1921–3
   Google Scholar
• July 1924 . Parliamentary Debates Vol. 176 , July , Commons, vol., 31, col. 2310–2, 2373–5
   Google Scholar
• Mar. 1924 . Parliamentary Debates Vol. 171 , Mar. , Commons, vol., 25, col. 1181–94, 1206–12
   Google Scholar
• Vol. 173 , Ibid., Commons, vol., 5 May 1924, col. 743–4
   Google Scholar
• University of Reading, Astor MSS, MS/1416/1/1/580, Hints for Speakers by the Unionist Central Office
   Google Scholar
• Mar. 1924 . The Times Mar. , 23 ‘Empire Naval Defences: Singapore and our Strategic Mobility’ by Leopold Amery; 30 Mar. 1924, ‘Empire Naval Defence’ by Leopold Amery
   Google Scholar
• Mar. 1924 . Daily Telegraph Mar. , 5 ‘Singapore Naval Base’ by Our Own Parliamentary Correspondent; 14 Mar. 1924, ‘Singapore Base’ by Lord Balfour; 18 Mar. 1924, ‘Singapore Base-Project Abandoned’
   Google Scholar
• Mar. 1925 . Mar. , NA CAB 23/49, Cabinet Minutes, 2
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre . The Rise and Fall of the Singapore Naval Base 46 – 51 .
   Google Scholar
• April 1924 . April , Churchill College, Cambridge, Lord Hankey Papers, HNKY/4/16, #138, I
   Google Scholar
• Mar. 1925 . Parliamentary Debates Vol. 181 , Mar. , Commons, vol., 4 and II, col. 414 and 1300–1; vol. 197, 28 Jun. 1926, col. 783; vol. 223, 12 Dec. 1928, 2100
   Google Scholar
• College , Churchill . 1926 . Cambridge, Tufton Beamish Papers, BEAM/4/2, Notes
   Google Scholar
• Mar. 1925 . Parliamentary Debates Vol. 182 , Mar. , Commons, vol., 23, col. 136
   Google Scholar
• 1925 . Ibid. Vol. 182 , Commons, vol., 23 Marv, col. 113–14 and 161
   Google Scholar
• Mar. 1925 . Parliamentary Debates Vol. 181 , Mar. , Commons, vol., 19, col. 2538; vol. 182, 23 Mar. 1925, col. 88–90
   Google Scholar
• Vol. 182 , Ibid., Commons, vol., 23 Mar. 1925, col. 130, vol. 215, 22 Mar. 1928, col. 613–15
   Google Scholar
• Vol. 215 , Ibid., Commons, vol., 22 Mar. 1928, col. 691
   Google Scholar
• Vol. 210 , Ibid., Commons, vol., 23 November 1927, col. 1773–4; vol. 211, 30 Nov. 1927, col. 477–8 and 6 Dec. 1927, col. 1165–6
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Debates Vol. 191 , Commons, vol., 15 Feb. 1926, col. 1551; vol. 180, 19 Feb. 1925, col. 1293; vol. 186, 15 Jul. 1925, col. 1265; vol. 188, 18 Nov. 1925, col. 351; vol. 192, 24 Feb. 1926, col. 503; vol. 200, I Dec. 1926, col. 1180
   Google Scholar
• Jan. 1993 . The Times Higher Education Supplementary Jan. , 8
   Google Scholar
• Hornby , R. 1972 . “ ‘The Influence of the Backbencher a Tory View’ ” . In The Backbencher and Parliament: A reader Edited by: Leonard , R. and Valentine , H. 232 – 3 . London in (),; M. Franklin and P. Norton, ‘Why do MPs Table Questions’, in M. Franklin and P. Norton (eds), Parliamentary Questions (Oxford, 1993), 104; D. N. Chester and N. Bowring, Questions in Parliament (Oxford, 1962), 203
   Google Scholar
• 1923 . London School of Economics, Morel MSS, F2/1/8, Morel to Ogilvie, 16 Jul
   Google Scholar
• Hornby . “ ‘The Influence of the Backbencher a Tory View’, 232–3; Franklin and Norton, ‘Why do MPs Table Questions’, 104; Chester and Bowring ” . In Questions in Parliament 203
   Google Scholar
• Apr. 1919 . Honorable Members: A study of the British backbencher Apr. , London Stansgate MSS, ST/73/79, House of Lords, London, Lloyd George Papers, F/33/2/32,20, Walter Long to Lloyd George; F/33/2/54, 15 Jun. 1919, Walter Long to Lloyd George; F/10//8/5, 15 Jun. 1922, Winston Churchill to Lloyd George; House of Lords, London, Bonar Law Papers, BL107/2/60, 18 Sept. 1922, G. Terrell to Bonar Law; P. Richards, (1959), 92
   Google Scholar
• 1998 . Commons Knowledge: How to be a backbencher 36 – 40 . London NA J. Ramsay MacDonald Papers, PRO/30/69/1170(1), Austen Chamberlain to Ramsey MacDonald, 2 Feb. 1925; PRO/30/69/1170(2), Ramsey MacDonald to Arthur Greenwood, 19 Mar. 1925; P. Flynn, (),; Leonard and Valentine, The Backbencher and Parliament, 103
   Google Scholar