REFERENCES
- Boersma, W. C., & Plawecki, H. M. After the NCA self-evaluation and visit: What happens? North Central Association Quarterly, 1972, 46, 335–339.
- Cope, O. E. An appraisal of school improvements resulting from the use of evaluative criteria in selected high schools in Tennessee. Dissertation Abstracts, 1952. 12, 697–698.
- Dyer, H. S. School evaluation: A realistic response to accountability. North Central Association Quarterly, 1972, 46, 390–396.
- Guidance program evaluation process and accompanying materials. Columbus: Ohio Department of Education, Division of Guidance and Testing, 1972. (mimeograph)
- Guidance services for Ohio schools. Columbus: Ohio Department of Education, Division of Guidance and Testing, 1971.
- Holliman, B. C. Educational improvements resulting from school self-evaluations as reported by selected principals in Texas. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, East Texas State University, 1969.
- Irvine, D. J. Meeting the demands for accountability. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 1971, 55, 80–86.
- Newman, C. A. An analysis of educational program recommendations resulting from evaluations of selected high schools of Allegheny county. Dissertation Abstracts, 1955, 15, 1,769–1,770.
- PRIDE. Process and instrumentation. Columbus: Ohio Department of Education, Division of Vocational Education, 1972. (mineograph)
- Wysong, H. E. The evaluation of secondary school guidance programs: The development and validation of instruments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1968.