References
- M. Born and R. Oppenheimer, Ann. Phys. 389, 457 (1927). doi: 10.1002/andp.19273892002
- S.L. Hobson, E.F. Valeev, A.G. Császár and J.F. Stanton, Mol. Phys. 107, 1153 (2009). doi: 10.1080/00268970902780262
- W. Kołos and L. Wolniewicz, J. Chem. Phys. 41, 3663 (1964). doi: 10.1063/1.1725796
- W. Kołos and L. Wolniewicz, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 2429 (1965). doi: 10.1063/1.1697142
- O.L. Polyansky and J. Tennyson, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 5056 (1999). doi: 10.1063/1.478404
- J.J. Lutz and J.M. Hutson, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 330, 43 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.jms.2016.08.007
- P. Barletta, S.V. Shirin, N.F. Zobov, O.L. Polyansky, J. Tennyson, E.F. Valeev and A.G. Császár, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 204307 (2006). doi: 10.1063/1.2378766
- C. Fábri, G. Czakó, G. Tasi and A.G. Császár, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 134314 (2009). doi: 10.1063/1.3097327
- G. Tarczay, A.G. Császár, W. Klopper, V. Szalay, W.D. Allen and H.F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 11971 (1999). doi: 10.1063/1.479135
- K. Aarset, A.G. Császár, E.L. Sibert, W.D. Allen, H.F. Schaefer, W. Klopper and J. Noga, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 4053 (2000). doi: 10.1063/1.481596
- A.G. Császár, V. Szalay and M.L. Senent, J. Chem. Phys.120, 1203 (2004). doi: 10.1063/1.1633260
- G. Tarczay, A.G. Császár, M.L. Leininger and W. Klopper, Chem. Phys. Lett. 322, 119 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00407-3
- A. Owens, S.N. Yurchenko, A. Yachmenev, J. Tennyson and W. Thiel, J. Chem. Phys. 142, 244306 (2015). doi: 10.1063/1.4922890
- M. Pavanello, L. Adamowicz, A. Alijah, N.F. Zobov, I.I. Mizus, O.L. Polyansky, J. Tennyson, T. Szidarovszky and A.G. Császár, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 184303 (2012). doi: 10.1063/1.4711756
- A. Owens, S.N. Yurchenko, A. Yachmenev, J. Tennyson and W. Thiel, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 104305 (2016). doi: 10.1063/1.4962261
- X. Huang, D.W. Schwenke and T.J. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 214304 (2008).
- A. Tajti, P.G. Szalay, A.G. Császár, M. Kállay, J. Gauss, E.F. Valeev, B.A. Flowers, J. Vázquez and J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 11599 (2004). doi: 10.1063/1.1811608
- Y.J. Bomble, J. Vázquez, M. Kállay, C. Michauk, P.G. Szalay, A.G. Császár, J. Gauss and J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 064108 (2006). doi: 10.1063/1.2206789
- M.E. Harding, J. Vázquez, B. Ruscic, A.K. Wilson, J. Gauss and J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 114111 (2008).
- J.H. Thorpe, C.A. Lopez, T.L. Nguyen, J.H. Baraban, D.H. Bross, B. Ruscic and J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys. 150, 224102 (2019). doi: 10.1063/1.5095937
- J.M.L. Martin and G. de Oliveira, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 1843 (1999). doi: 10.1063/1.479454
- A.D. Boese, M. Oren, O. Atasoylu, J.M.L. Martin, M. Kállay and J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 4129 (2004). doi: 10.1063/1.1638736
- A. Karton, E. Rabinovich, J.M.L. Martin and B. Ruscic, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 144108 (2006).
- M.S. Schuurman, S.R. Muir, W.D. Allen and H.F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 11586 (2004). doi: 10.1063/1.1707013
- H.M. Jaeger, H.F. Schaefer, J. Demaison, A.G. Császár and W.D. Allen, J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 6, 3066 (2010). doi: 10.1021/ct1000236
- K.A. Peterson, D. Feller and D.A. Dixon, Theor. Chem. Acc. 131, 1079 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s00214-011-1079-5
- A. Karton, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 6, 292 (2016). doi: 10.1002/wcms.1249
- S.J. Klippenstein, L.B. Harding and B. Ruscic, J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 6580 (2017). doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b05945
- H. Sellers and P. Pulay, Chem. Phys. Lett. 103, 463 (1984). doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(84)85277-X
- H. Sellers, Chem. Phys. Lett. 108, 339 (1984). doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(84)85202-1
- N.C. Handy, Y. Yamaguchi and H.F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 4481 (1986). doi: 10.1063/1.450020
- D.W. Schwenke, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 2352 (2001). doi: 10.1021/jp0032513
- J. Gauss, A. Tajti, M. Kállay, J.F. Stanton and P.G. Szalay, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 144111 (2006). doi: 10.1063/1.2356465
- E.F. Valeev and C.D. Sherrill, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 3921 (2003). doi: 10.1063/1.1540626
- A. Tajti, P.G. Szalay and J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 014102 (2007). doi: 10.1063/1.2744014
- Of course, when the DBOC becomes too large (in regions sufficiently close to intersections or weakly avoided crossings), the adiabatic approximation must be abandoned.
- T.D. Crawford, J.F. Stanton, W.D. Allen and H.F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 10626 (1997). doi: 10.1063/1.474178
- J.C. Saeh and J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 8275 (1999). doi: 10.1063/1.480171
- T.D. Crawford, E. Kraka, J.F. Stanton and D. Cremer, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 10638 (2001). doi: 10.1063/1.1373433
- P.G. Szalay, J. Vázquez, C. Simmons and J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 7624 (2004). doi: 10.1063/1.1795153
- J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 10382 (2001). doi: 10.1063/1.1416176
- J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 134309 (2007). doi: 10.1063/1.2715547
- J. Čížek and J. Paldus, J. Chem. Phys. 47, 3976 (1967). doi: 10.1063/1.1701562
- J. Paldus and J. Čížek, Chem. Phys. Lett. 3, 1 (1969). doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(69)80001-1
- J. Paldus and J. Čížek, Phys. Rev. A 2, 2268 (1970). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.2.2268
- J. Paldus and J. Čížek, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 2293 (1971). doi: 10.1063/1.1675179
- J. Paldus and J. Čížek, Can. J. Chem. 63, 1803 (1985). doi: 10.1139/v85-301
- Note that the separation of the kinetic energy operator into first derivatives acting upon the left and right hand wavefunctions is a critical step in any numerical implementation of the DBOC, and is of course employed in its derivation and evaluation at correlated levels of theory, see refs. [32–35].
- J. Gerratt and I.M. Mills, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 1719 (1968). doi: 10.1063/1.1670299
- H. Sekino and R.J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 4225 (1985). doi: 10.1063/1.448837
- It should be noted that the examples given in this work have largely utilized UHF wavefunctions. This is perhaps misleading, as ROHF (and RHF!) are by no means immune from problems regarding orbitals stability. We have employed UHF simply for the reason that the CCSD-level DBOC using ROHF wavefunctions has not been coded in any quantum chemistry package.
- A possible exception to this statement is the case of activation energies. The DBOC is related to the expectation value of the second derivative of the wavefunction with respect to nuclear coordinate. For many transition states, the wavefunction is indeed varying rapidly, and thus “large” contributions of the DBOC to activation energies (over one kJ/mol), are not necessarily unexpected. See ref. [20].
- J.F. Stanton and J. Gauss, in Advances in Chemical Physics (2003), chap. chapter2, pp. 101–146.
- W. Kutzelnigg, Mol. Phys. 90, 909 (1997). doi: 10.1080/00268979709482675
- L. Adamowicz, W.D. Laidig and R.J. Bartlett, Int. J. Quantum. Chem. 26, 245 (1984). doi: 10.1002/qua.560260825
- H. Koch, H.J.A. Jensen, P. Jørgensen, T. Helgaker, G.E. Scuseria and H.F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 4924 (1990). doi: 10.1063/1.457710