Using Two-Level Factor Analysis to Test for Cluster Bias in Ordinal Data

REFERENCES

• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007). Computationally efficient estimation of multilevel high-dimensional latent variable models. Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Statistical Meetings, Section on Statistics in Epidemiology (pp. 2531–2535). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cham, H., West, S.G., Ma, Y., & Aiken, L.S. (2012). Estimating latent variable interactions with nonnormal observed data: A comparison of four approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 840–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffersson, A. (1975). Factor analysis of dichotomized variables. Psychometrika, 40, 5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R.F. (1983). Wald, likelihood ratio, and Lagrange multiplier tests in econometrics. In M.D. Intriligator & Z. Griliches (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (pp. 796–801). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J.-P., & Verhagen, A.J. (2010). Random item effects modeling for cross-national survey data. In E. Davidov, P. Schmidt, & J. Billiet (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (pp. 467–488). London, UK: Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Grilli, L., & Rampichini, C. (2007). Multilevel factor models for ordinal variables. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J.J., Maas, C.J., & Brinkhuis, M.J. (2010). The effect of estimation method and sample size in multilevel structural equation modeling. Statistica Neerlandica, 64, 157–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, P.J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (pp. 221–233). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jak, S., & Oort, F.J. (under review). On the power of the test for cluster bias.
   Google Scholar
• Jak, S., Oort, F.J., & Dolan, C.V. (2013). A test for cluster bias: Detecting violations of measurement invariance across clusters in multilevel data. Structural Equation Modeling, 20(2), 265–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koomen, H.M. Y., Verschueren, K., & Pianta, R.C. (2007). Leerling Leerkracht Relatie Vragenlijst: Handleiding [Student-Teacher Relationship Scale: Manual]. Houten, The Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F.M., & Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. London, UK: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Mellenbergh, G.J. (1989). Item bias and item response theory. International Journal of Educational Statistics, 13, 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Mellenbergh, G.J. (1994). A unidimensional latent trait model for continuous item responses. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 223–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (1990). Mean and covariance structure analysis of hierarchical data. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Statistics Series, No. 62.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2007). Mplus users guide ( 5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta, R.C. (2001). Student-Teacher Relationship Scale: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004). Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 69, 167–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, E., & West, S.G. (2009). Level-specific evaluation of model fit in multilevel structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(4), 583–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structures between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spilt, J.L., Koomen, H.M., & Jak, S. (2012). Are boys better off with male and girls with female teachers? A multilevel investigation of measurement invariance and gender match in teacher–student relationship quality. Journal of School Psychology, 50(3), 363–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoel, R.D., Garre, F.G., Dolan, C.V., & van den Wittenboer, G. (2006). On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints. Psychological Methods, 11, 439–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen, A.J., & Fox, J.-P. (2012). Bayesian tests of measurement invariance. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 383–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica, 50, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widaman, K.F., & Reise, S.P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K.J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S.G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: Ame-rican Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar