1,552
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Testing Group Mean Differences of Latent Variables in Multilevel Data Using Multiple-Group Multilevel CFA and Multilevel MIMIC Modeling

&

REFERENCES

  • Allua, S., Stapleton, L.M., & Beretvas, S.N. (2008). Testing latent mean differences between observed and unobserved groups using multilevel factor mixture models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 357–378. doi:10.1177/0013164407312600
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2012). Multiple group multilevel analysis (mplus web notes no. 16). Retrieved from http://statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote16.pdf
  • Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equation models with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
  • Bradley, J.V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31(2), 144–152. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1978.tb00581.x
  • Brown, M.B., & Forsythe, A.B. (1974). Robust tests for the equality of variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 364–367. doi: 10.2307/2285659
  • Cheng, S-T., Chow, P.K., Yu, E.C. S., & Chan, A.C. M.. (2012). Leisure activities alleviate depressive symptoms in nursing home residents with very mild or mild dementia. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20(10), 904–908. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3182423988
  • Finch, W.H., & French, B.F. (2011). Estimation of MIMIC model parameters with multilevel data.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(2), 229–252. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.557338
  • Fleishman, J., Spector, W., & Altman, B. (2002). Impact of differential item functioning on age and gender differences in functional disability. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, S275–S284. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.5.S275
  • Hancock, G.R. (2001). Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured means modeling and MIMIC approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika, 66(3), 373–388. doi:10.1007/BF02294440
  • Heck, R.H., & Thomas, S.L. (2009). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hoogland, J.J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling.Sociological Methods & Research, 26(3), 329–367. doi: 10.1177/0049124198026003003
  • Hox, J. (1998). Multilevel modeling: When and why. In I. Balderjahn, R. Mathar & M. Schader (Eds.), Classification, data analysis, and data highways (pp. 147–154). New York: Springer.
  • Hox, J.J., & Maas, C.J. M. (2001). The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with pseudobalanced groups and small samples. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(2), 157–174. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_1
  • Jak, S., Ort, F., & Dolan, C. (2014). Measurement Bias in Multilevel Data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 31–39. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.856694
  • Jöreskog, K.G., & Goldberger, A.S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and mulitple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(351), 631–639. doi: 10.2307/2285946
  • Kaplan, D. (1988). The impact of specification error on the estimation, testing, and improvement of structural equation models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23(1), 69–86. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_4
  • Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kim, E.S., Kwok, O., & Yoon, M. (2012). Testing factorial invariance in multilevel data: A monte carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(2), 250–267. doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.659623
  • Kim, E.S., Yoon, M., & Lee, T. (2012). Testing measurement invariance using MIMIC. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(3), 469–492. doi:10.1177/0013164411427395
  • Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
  • Maas, C.J., & Hox, J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92. doi:10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86
  • Marsh, H.W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A.J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of Big-Five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and La Dolce Vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1194–1218. doi: 10.1037/a0026913
  • Miller, J.D. (2010). Longitudinal Study of American Youth, 1987-1994, and 2007: User Guide (ICPSR 30263). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
  • Muthén, B.O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54(4), 557–585. doi: 10.1007/BF02296397
  • Muthén, B. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3), 376–398. doi: 10.1177/0049124194022003006
  • Muthén, B. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. Sociological Methodology, 27(1), 453–480. doi:10.1111/1467-9531.271034
  • Muthén, B.O., & Muthén, L.K. (2012). Mplus 7 [Computer software]. Los Angenles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • O’Brien, R.G. (1979). A general ANOVA method for robust tests of additive models for variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 877–880. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1979.10481047
  • Ramsey, P.H. (1994). Testing variances in psychological and educational research. Journal of Educational Statistics, 19, 23–42. doi: 10.2307/1165175
  • Thompson, M.S., & Green, S.B. (2006). Evaluating between group differences in latent variable means. In G.R. Hancock, & R.O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 119–169). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Widaman, K., & Reise, S. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K.J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S.G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Wilcox, R.R. (1987). New Statistical Procedures for the Social Sciences: Modern Solutions to Basic Problems. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
  • Woods, C.M. (2009). Evaluation of MIMIC-model methods for DIF testing with comparison to two-group analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(1), 1–27. doi:10.1080/00273170802620121

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.