How Do Propensity Score Methods Measure Up in the Presence of Measurement Error? A Monte Carlo Study

REFERENCES

• Austin, P.C. (2009). Some methods of propensity score matching had superior performance to others: Results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biometrical Journal, 51(1), 171–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, P.C., Grootendorst, P., Normand, S.L., & Anderson, G.M. (2007). Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: A Monte Carlo study. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 754–768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonaccorsi, J.P. (2011). Measurement error. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, J.V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 144–152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, R.J., Ruppert, D., Stefanski, L.A., & Crainiceanu, C.M. (2006). Measurement error in nonlinear models: A modern perspective (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, W.G. (1968). Errors of measurement in statistics. Technometrics, 10, 637–666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Group.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, R.B. (1998). Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in Medicine, 17(19), 2265–2281. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO;2-B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, W.A. (1987). Measurement Error Models. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, P.W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh, C. (2006, April). Estimation and diagnostics for errors-in-variables mixed-effects models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks, C., Smith, M., Ackland, H., Bane, M J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., & Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Michalopoulos, C., Bloom, H.S., & Hill, C.J. (2004). Can propensity score methods match the findings from a random assignment evaluation of mandatory welfare to work programs? The Review of Econometrics and Statistics, 86(1), 156–179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedhazur, E.J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, T. (2012). Propensity score analysis with fallible covariates: A note on a latent variable modeling approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(5), 715–733. doi:10.1177/0013164412440999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey, R.R., & Barcikowski, R.S. (1992). Type I error and the number of iterations in Monte Carlo studies of robustness. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 283–288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R., & Rubin, D.B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D.B. (2010). On the limitations of comparative effectiveness research. Statistics in Medicine, 29(19), 1991–1995. doi:10.1002/sim.3960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D.B. (2001). Using propensity score to help design observational studies: Application to the Tobacco litigation. Heath Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2, 169–188
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W.H., & Shavelson, R.J. (2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs (report from the Governing Board of the American Educational Research Association Grants Program). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W.R., & Steiner, P.M. (2010). A primer on propensity score analysis. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews, 10(1), 19–26
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W.R., Clark, M.H., & Steiner, P.M. (2008). Can nonrandomized experiments yield accurate answers? A randomized experiment comparing random and nonrandom assignments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1334–1344. doi:10.1198/016214508000000733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, P.M., Cook, T.D., & Shadish, W.R. (2011). On the importance of reliable covariate measurement in selection bias adjustments using propensity scores. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 36(2), 213–236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, P.M., Cook, T.D., Shadish, W.R., & Clark, M.H. (2010). The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 250–267. doi:10.1037/a0018719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, E.A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and look forward. Statistical Science, 25(1), 1–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoemmes, F., & Kim, E.S. (2011). A systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(1), 90–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S.G., & Thoemmes, F. (2010). Campbell's and Rubin's perspectives on causal inference. Psychological Methods, 15(1), 18–37. doi:10.1037/a0015917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar