References
- Aldrich, J. (2008). R. A. Fisher on Bayes and Bayes' theorem. Bayesian Analysis, 3, 161–170. doi: 10.1214/08-ba306
- Box, J.F. (1978). R. A. Fisher: The life of a scientist. New York: Wiley.
- Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684. doi: 10.1037/h0043943
- Efron, B. (1986). Why isn't everyone a Bayesian? The American Statistician, 40, 1–11. doi: 10.2307/2683111
- Efron, B. (2005). Modern science and the Bayesian-Frequentist controversy (Technical report No. 2005-21B/236). Division of Biostatistics, Stanford University.
- Feinberg, S.E. (2006). When did Bayesian inference become “Bayesian”? International Society for Bayesian Analysis, 1, 1–40. doi: 10.1214/06-ba101
- Fisher, R.A. (1958). The nature of probability. Centennial Review, 2, 261–274.
- Hoijtink, H., van Kooten, P., & Hulsker, K. (2016a). Why Bayesian psychologists should change the way they used the Bayes factor. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 1--9. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.969364.
- Hoijtink, H., van Kooten, P., & Hulsker, K. (2016b) Bayes factors have frequency properties, this should not be ignored: A rejoinder to Morey, Wagenmakers, and Rouder (2016) Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 18--21. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1071705.
- Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Kaplan, D. (2014). Bayesian statistics for the social sciences. New York: Guilford Press.
- Kass, R.E., & Raftery, A.E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795. doi: 10.2307/2291091
- Lavine, M. & Schervish, M.J. (1999). Bayes factors: What they are and what they are not. The American Statistician, 53, 119–122. doi: 10.1080/00031305.1999.10474443
- Morey, R.D., Wagenmakers, E-J, & Rouder, J.N. (2016). Calibrated Bayes factors should not be used: A reply to Hoijtink, van Kooten, and Hulsker. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 10--17. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1052710.
- Robinson, D.H. & Levin, J.R. (2010). The not-so-quiet revolution: Cautionary comments on the rejection of hypothesis testing in favor of a “causal” modeling alternative. Journal of Modern and Applied Statistical Methods, 9, 332–339. doi: 10.1037/a0030368
- Rodgers, J.L. (2010a). Statistical and mathematical modeling versus NHST? There's no competition. Journal of Modern and Applied Statistical Methods, 9, 340–347.
- Rodgers, J.L. (2010b). The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: A quiet methodological revolution. American Psychologist, 65, 1–12. doi: 10.1037/a0018326
- Savage, L.J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: John Wiley.
- Senn, S. (2011). You may believe you are a Bayesian but you are probably wrong. RMM, 2, 48–66.
- Stigler, S.M. (1984). The history of statistics: The measurement of uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Vallverdu, J. (2008). The false dilemma: Bayesian vs. frequentist. E-Logos: Electronic Journal for Philosophy, ISSN: 1211-0442
- Zabell, S. (1989). R. A. Fisher on the history of inverse probability. Statistical Science, 4, 247–263. doi: 10.1214/ss/1177012488