3,348
Views
70
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Tutorial

On the Computation of the RMSEA and CFI from the Mean-And-Variance Corrected Test Statistic with Nonnormal Data in SEM

References

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2010). Simple second order chi-square correction. Web note. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf
  • Bentler, P. M. (2008). EQS structural equation modeling software. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
  • Brosseau-Liard, P., Savalei, V., & Li, L. (2012). An investigation of the sample performance of two non-normality corrections for RMSEA. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 904–930. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715252
  • Brosseau-Liard, P. E., & Savalei, V. (2014). Adjusting relative fit indices for nonnormality. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 460–470. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.933697
  • Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494. doi:10.1177/0049124108314720
  • Heene, M., Hilbert, S., Draxler, C., Ziegler, M., & Bühner, M. (2011). Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: A cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices. Psychological Methods, 16, 319–336. doi:10.1037/a0024917
  • Holzinger, K., & Swineford, F. (1939). A study in factor analysis: The stability of a bifactor solution. Supplementary educational monograph, no. 48. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 486–507. doi:10.1177/0049124114543236
  • Lai, K., & Green, S. (2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 220–239. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306
  • Li, L., & Bentler, P. M. (2006). Robust statistical tests for evaluating the hypothesis of close fit of misspecified mean and covariance structural models. In UCLA statistics preprint #506. Los Angeles: University of California.
  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
  • Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2017). Maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models for continuous data: Standard errors and goodness of fit. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 383–394. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1269606
  • Maydeu-Olivares, A., Shi, D., & Rosseel, Y. (2017). Assessing fit in structural equation models: A Monte Carlo evaluation of RMSEA versus SRMR confidence intervals and tests of close fit. Structural Equation Modeling. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1389611
  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user's guide. (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2000). Improving the root mean square error of approximation for nonnormal conditions in structural equation modeling. Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 251–268. doi:10.1080/00220970009600095
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. URL http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/ doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg ( Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications to developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Savalei, V. (2010). Small sample statistics for incomplete nonnormal data: Extensions of complete data formulae and a Monte Carlo comparison. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 245–268. doi:10.1080/10705511003659375
  • Savalei, V. (2012). The relationship between RMSEA and model misspecification in CFA models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 910–932. doi:10.1177/0013164412452564
  • Savalei, V., & Rhemtulla, M. (2013). The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 201–223. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02049.x
  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
  • Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). On normal theory and associated test statistics in covariance structure analysis under two classes of nonnormal distributions. Statistica Sinica, 9, 831–853.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.