The Role of Time in the Quest for Understanding Psychological Mechanisms

References

• Allison, P. D., Williams, R., & Moral-Benito, E. (2017). Maximum likelihood for cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 1–17. doi: 10.1177/2378023117710578
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. F., & Maxwell, S. E. (2016). There’s more than one way to conduct a replication study: Beyond statistical significance. Psychological Methods, 21(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1037/met0000051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M. (2003). Panel data econometrics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. doi: 10.2307/2297968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltes, P. B., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1979). History and rationale of longitudinal research. In J. R. Nesselroade & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development (pp. 1–39). New York, NY: Academic Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1988). Life-span developmental psychology: Introduction to research methods (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Beevers, C. G., & Miller, I. W. (2005). Unlinking negative cognition and symptoms of depression: Evidence of a specific treatment effect for cognitive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 68–77. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltz, A. M., Wright, A. G., Sprague, B. N., & Molenaar, P. C. (2016). Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. Assessment, 23, 447–458. doi: 10.1177/1073191116648209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, A. R. (1988). The history of continuous-time econometric models. Econometric Theory, 4, 365–383. doi: 10.1017/S0266466600013359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boker, S. M., & Wenger, M. J. (Eds.). (2007). Data analytic techniques for dynamical systems in the social and behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Brand, J. E. (2010). A general panel model with random and fixed effects: A structural equations approach. Social Forces, 89, 1–34. doi: 10.1353/sof.2010.0072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., & Dolan, C. V. (2006). Why g is not an adaptation: A comment on Kanazawa (2004). Psychological Review, 113(2), 433–437. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.113.2.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Kievit, R. A., Cervone, D., & Hood, S. B. (2009). The two disciplines of scientific psychology, or: The disunity of psychology as a working hypothesis. In J. Valsiner, P. C. M. Molenaar, M. C. D. P. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 67–97). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110(2), 203–219. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bringmann, L. F., Hamaker, E. L., Vigo, D. E., Aubert, A., Borsboom, D., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2017). Changing dynamics: Time-varying autoregressive models using generalized additive modeling. Psychological Methods, 22, 409–425. doi: 10.1037/met0000085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brose, A., Voelkle, M. C., Lövdén, M., Lindenberger, U., & Schmiedek, F. (2015). Differences in the between-person and within-person structures of affect are a matter of degree. European Journal of Personality, 29(1), 55–71. doi: 10.1002/per.1961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butner, J. E., Gagnon, K. T., Geuss, M. N., Lessard, D. A., & Story, T. N. (2015). Utilizing topology to generate and test theories of change. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1037/a0037802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., … Riddell, A. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(1), 1–32. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Chow, S.-M., & Hunter, M. D. (in press). Stochastic differential equation models with time-varying parameters. In K. v. Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & M. C. Voelkle (Eds.), Continuous time modeling in the behavioral and related sciences. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, S.-M., Ferrer, E., & Hsieh, F. (Eds.). (2009). Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics: An interdisciplinary dialogue (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, S.-M., Lu, Z., Sherwood, A., & Zhu, H. (2016). Fitting nonlinear ordinary differential equation models with random effects and unknown initial conditions using the stochastic approximation expectation–maximization (SAEM) algorithm. Psychometrika, 81(1), 102–134. doi: 10.1007/s11336-014-9431-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577. doi: 10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684. doi: 10.1037/h0043943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116–127. doi: 10.1037/h0076829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deboeck, P. R., & Preacher, K. J. (2016). No need to be discrete: A method for continuous time mediation analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 61–75. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.973960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, C. C., Oud, J. H. L., & Voelkle, M. C. (2017). Continuous time structural equation modeling with R package ctsem. Journal of Statistical Software, 77(5), 1–35. doi: 10.18637/jss.v077.i05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, C. C., & Voelkle, M. C. (in press-a). Hierarchical Bayesian continuous time dynamic modeling. Psychological Methods.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, C. C., & Voelkle, M. C. (in press-b). Understanding the time course of interventions with continuous time dynamic models. In K. v. Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & M. C. Voelkle (Eds.), Continuous time modeling in the behavioral and related sciences. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Franic, S., Borsboom, D., Dolan, C. V., & Boomsma, D. I. (2014). The big five personality traits: Psychological entities or statistical constructs? Behavior Genetics, 44(6), 591–604. doi: 10.1007/s10519-013-9625-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1987). Taking account of time lags in causal models. Child Development, 58(1), 80–92. doi: 10.2307/1130293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halaby, C. N. (2004). Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 507–544. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. doi: 10.1037/a0038889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, E. L., & Wichers, M. (2017). No time like the present: Discovering the hidden dynamics in intensive longitudinal data. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 10–15. doi: 10.1177/0963721416666518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, A., & Bühlmann, P. (2015). Jointly interventional and observational data: Estimation of interventional Markov equivalence classes of directed acyclic graphs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 77(1), 291–318. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, D. W., Brown, B. L., Shwalb, D. A., Godfrey, K., & Larcher, A. M. (2006). The efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in adult social anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 21(1), 102–111. doi: 10.1177/0269881106065102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–960. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, C. (2007). Panel data analysis—Advantages and challenges. TEST, 16(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1007/s11749-007-0046-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of panel data (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5–86. doi: 10.1257/jel.47.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kievit, R., Brandmaier, A., Ziegler, G., van Harmelen, A.-L., Mooij, S. D., Moutoussis, M., … Dolan, R. (2017). Developmental cognitive neuroscience using latent change score models: A tutorial and applications. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/110429
   Google Scholar
• Kiviet, J. F. (1995). On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 53–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01643-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluckhohn, C., & Murray, H. A. (1953). Personality formation: The determinants. In C. Kluckhohn, H. A. Murray, & D. M. Schneider (Eds.), Personality in nature, society, and culture (pp. 53–67). New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. (2017). Person-specific versus multilevel autoregressive models: Accuracy in parameter estimates at the population and individual levels. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 70(3), 480–498. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marriott, F. H. C., & Pope, J. A. (1954). Bias in the estimation of autocorrelations. Biometrika, 41, 390–402. doi: 10.2307/2332719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. E., Cole, D. A., & Mitchell, M. A. (2011). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(5), 816–841. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.606716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577–605. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (2001). Latent difference score structural models for linear dynamic analyses with incomplete longitudinal data. In L. Collins & A. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 139–175). Washington, DC: APA Press.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (2004). Methods for dynamic change hypotheses. In K. van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Recent developments on structural equation models (pp. 295–335). Dorderecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mehl, M. R., & Conner, T. S. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M. (1987). Dynamic assessment and adaptive optimization of the psychotherapeutic process. Behavioral Assessment, 9, 389–416.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218. doi: 10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 112–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., Sinclair, K. O., Rovine, M. J., Ram, N., & Corneal, S. E. (2009). Analyzing developmental processes on an individual level using nonstationary time series modeling. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 260–271. doi: 10.1037/a0014170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2015). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, M. C., Hunter, M. D., Pritikin, J. N., Zahery, M., Brick, T. R., Kirkpatrick, R. M., … Boker, S. M. (2016). OpenMx 2.0: Extended structural equation and statistical modeling. Psychometrika, 81(2), 535–549. doi: 10.1007/s11336-014-9435-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishizawa, S., Benkelfat, C., Young, S. N., Leyton, M., Mzengeza, S., de Montigny, C., … Diksic, M. (1997). Differences between males and females in rates of serotonin synthesis in human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94(10), 5308–5313. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, D. (2007). From the Hodgkin-Huxley axon to the virtual heart. The Journal of Physiology, 580(Pt 1), 15–22. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.119370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, D. (2012). A theory of biological relativity: No privileged level of causation. Interface Focus, 2(1), 55–64. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oravecz, Z., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2009). A hierarchical Ornstein–Uhlenbeck model for continuous repeated measurement data. Psychometrika, 74(3), 395–418. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9106-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oravecz, Z., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2011). A hierarchical latent stochastic differential equation model for affective dynamics. Psychological Methods, 16(4), 468–490. doi: 10.1037/a0024375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oravecz, Z., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2016). Bayesian data analysis with the bivariate hierarchical Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(1), 106–119. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1110512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou, L., Hunter, M. D., & Chow, S.-M. (2017). dynr: Dynamic modeling in R. R package version 0.1.11-8. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dynr
   Google Scholar
• Oud, J. H. L., & Jansen, R. A. R. G. (2000). Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of SEM. Psychometrika, 65(2), 199–215. doi: 10.1007/BF02294374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oud, J. H. L., & Singer, H. (2008). Continuous time modeling of panel data: SEM versus filter techniques. Statistica Neerlandica, 62(0 ), 4–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2007.00376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (1995). Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika, 82(4), 669–688. doi: 10.1093/biomet/82.4.669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmiedek, F., Lövden, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2010). Hundred days of cognitive training enhance broad cognitive abilities in adulthood: Findings from the COGITO study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2(27), 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2010.00027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Shpitser, I., & Pearl, J. (2006). Identification of joint interventional distributions in recursive semi-markovian causal models. Paper presented at the 21st national conference on artificial intelligence, Menlo Park, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, H. (1991). LSDE - A program package for the simulation, graphical display, optimal filtering and maximum likelihood estimation of linear stochastic differential equations, User's guide. Meersburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, H. (2010). SEM modeling with singular moment matrices part I: ML-estimation of time series. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 34, 301–320. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.2010.509524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, H. (2011). Continuous-discrete state-space modeling of panel data with nonlinear filter algorithms. Advances in Statistical Analysis, 95(4), 375–413. doi: 10.1007/s10182-011-0172-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, H. (2012). SEM modeling with singular moment matrices. Part II: ML-estimation of sampled stochastic differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 36, 22–43. doi: 10.1080/0022250x.2010.532259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stan Development Team. (2016). RStan: The R interface to Stan. (Version 2.14.1.). Retrieved from http://mc-stan.org
   Google Scholar
• Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. (2013). Ambulatory assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 151–176. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J. (1986). Between groups and individuals: Psychologists' and laypersons' interpretations of correlational findings. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The individual subject and scientific psychology (pp. 113–151). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voelkle, M. C. (2015). Comment on “Morality in everyday life”. Science, 348(6236), 767. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkle, M. C., Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., & Lindenberger, U. (2014). Toward a unified framework for the study of between-person and within-person structures: Building a bridge between two research paradigms. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 193–213. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.889593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkle, M. C., & Oud, J. H. L. (2013). Continuous time modelling with individually varying time intervals for oscillating and non-oscillating processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(1), 103–126. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02043.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkle, M. C., & Oud, J. H. L. (2015). Relating latent change score and continuous time models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(3), 366–381. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.935918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H. L., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2012). An SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: Relating authoritarianism and anomia. Psychological Methods, 17, 176–192. doi: 10.1037/a0027543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H. L., von Oertzen, T., & Lindenberger, U. (2012). Maximum likelihood dynamic factor modeling for arbitrary N and T using SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 19(3), 329–350. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2012.687656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, G. G., Joachim R. F., & Jürgen S. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, Evolution and Enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127(1), 139–169.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Joffe, M. M., & Small, D. S. (2011). Causal inference for continuous-time processes when covariates are observed only at discrete times. Annales of Statistics, 39(1), 131–173. doi: 10.1214/10-AOS830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar