Alternative Multiple Imputation Inference for Categorical Structural Equation Modeling

References

• Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing Data. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–136. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 545–557. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. W. (1957). Maximum likelihood estimates for the multivariate normal distribution when some observations are missing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 52(278), 200–203. doi:10.1080/01621459.1957.10501379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 697–715). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46(4), 443–459. doi:10.1007/BF02293801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner, T. E. (2008). What improves with increased missing data imputations? Structural Equation Modeling, 15(4), 651–675. doi:10.1080/10705510802339072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouhlila, D. S., & Sellaouti, F. (2013). Multiple imputation using chained equations for missing data in TIMSS: a case study. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 1(4). doi:10.1186/2196-0739-1-4
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37(1), 62–83. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00789.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, L., & Lee, T. (2009). Covariance structure model fit testing under missing data: An application of the supplemented EM algorithm. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(2), 281–304. doi:10.1080/00273170902794255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffersson, A., & Gunsjö, A. (1996). A short note on the estimation of the asymptotic covariance matrix for polychoric correlations. Psychometrika, 61(1), 173–175. doi:0033-3123/96/0300-95277500.75/0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core Team, R. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., Keller, B. T., & Levy, R. (2018). A fully conditional specification approach to multilevel imputation of categorical and continuous variables. Psychological Methods. 23(2), 298–317. doi:10.1037/met0000148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Mansolf, M. (2018). Assessing the fit of structural equation models with multiply imputed data. Psychological Methods, 23(1), 76–93. doi:10.1037/met0000102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Peugh, J. L. (2004). Using an EM covariance matrix to estimate structural equation models with missing data: Choosing an adjusted sample size to improve the accuracy of inferences. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(1), 1–19. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1101_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 625–641. doi:10.1080/10705510903203573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8(3), 206–213. doi:10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1994). On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix. Psychometrika, 59(3), 381–389. doi:10.1007/BF02296131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, B. T., & Enders, C. K. (2017). Blimp User’s Manual (Version 1.0). Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T., & Cai, L. (2012). Alternative multiple imputation inference for mean and covariance structure modeling. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 37(6), 675–702. doi:10.3102/1076998612458320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J. (2010). Effects of full information maximum likelihood, expectation maximization, multiple imputation, and similar response pattern imputation on structural equation modeling with incomplete and multivariate nonnormal data (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2006). Limited information estimation and testing of discretized multivariate normal structural models. Psychometrika, 71(1), 57–77. doi:10.1007/s11336-005-0773-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., Cai, L., & Hernández, A. (2011). Comparing the fit of item response theory and factor analysis models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(3), 333–356. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.581993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2005). Limited- and full-information estimation and goodness-of-fit testing in 2n contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(471), 1009–1020. doi:10.1198/016214504000002069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2014). Assessing approximate fit in categorical data analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(4), 305–328. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.911075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, X.-L., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Performing likelihood ratio tests with multiply imputed data sets. Biometrika, 79(1), 103–111. doi:10.1093/biomet/79.1.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, S., & Cai, L. (2015). Evaluating structural equation models for categorical outcomes: A new test statistic and a practical challenge of interpretation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(6), 569–583. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1032398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olinsky, A., Chen, S., & Harlow, L. (2003). The comparative efficacy of imputation methods for missing data in structural equation modeling. European Journal of Operational Research, 151(1), 53–79. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00578-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44(4), 443–460. doi:10.1007/BF02296207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581–592. doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(4), 545–571. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3304_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, T., Mark, L. D., & Jeffrey, D. L. (2009). Effects of missing data methods in structural equation modeling with nonnormal longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(1), 70–98. doi:10.1080/10705510802569918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, Y., & Wisenbaker, J. (1999). A comparison of the effectiveness of missing data treatments in the context of structural equation modeling. Paper presented at the 1999 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., Koopman, R. F., & Linn, R. L. (1969). Evaluation of factor analytic procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 34(4), 421–459. doi:10.1007/BF02290601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S. (2007). Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 16(3), 219–242. doi:10.1177/0962280206074463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S., Brand, J. P. L., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C. G. M., & Rubin, D. B. (2006). Fully conditional specification in multivariate imputation. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 76(12), 1049–1064. doi:10.1080/10629360600810434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, P. T. (2009). How to impute interactions, squares, and other transformed variables. Sociological Methodology, 39(1), 265–291. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2009.01215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. (2007). Missing data analysis in structural equation modeling: Expectation maximization and multiple imputation methods (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30(4), 377–399. doi:10.1002/sim.4067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, R. D., & Sacker, A. (2002). Strategies for handling missing data in SEM: A user’s perspective. In G. A. Marcoulides & I. Moustaki (Eds.), Latent variable and latent structure models (pp. 105–120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, R. J., & Edwards, M. C. (2007). Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 58–79. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Jia, & Enders (2015). A comparison of imputation strategies for ordinal missing data on Likert scale variables, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(5), 484–503. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1022644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (1997). Mean and covariance structure analysis: Theoretical and practical improvements. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(438), 767–774. doi:10.1080/01621459.1997.10474029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 165–200. doi:10.1111/0081-1750.00078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., Lambert, P., & Fouladi, R. (2004). Mardia’s multivariate kurtosis with missing data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), 413–437. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar